It’s Dumb and Dangerous for Liberals to Conflate All Conservatives With MAGA

[Smokin' OP]

"Make America Great Again". Don't we all want that? How did the socialist left manage to turn it into something sinister?

Because, make america great again, was another Trump lie.

 

[22lcidw]

I would agree with you if non-MAGA Republicans did not support stolen election fantasies, did not protect Trump, did not look the other way

That makes them complicit

Following the Pirog leads and then looking at the absurd in elections. To many, election integrity is suspect.

 

[scruffy]

Lol. Until the resistance battle flag is seen once more on the bloody field...

lol

Now you're just being a putz.

We don't surrender to commies.

Or dictators.

Let me remind you of something.

"The most shocking cruelty was exercised a few nights ago, upon a poor old man a tidesman one Malcolm he is reckond creasy, a quarrel was pickd with him, he was afterward taken, & tard, & featherd. Theres no law that knows a punishment for the greatest crimes beyond what this is, of cruel torture. And this instance exceed any other before it, he was stript stark naked, one of the severest cold nights this winter, his body coverd all over with tar, then with feathers, his arm dislocated in tearing off his cloaths, he dragged in a cart with thousands attending, some beating him with clubs & knocking him out of the cart, then in again. They gave him several severe whipings, at different parts of the town. This spectacle of horror & sportive curelty was exhibited for about five hours".

"A New Method of Macaroni Making": Tar and Feathering in the American Revolution

Tar and feathering in the American Revolution was far more violent than it's often made out. Learn the real history of tar and feathering.

eastindiabloggingco.com

 

[beagle9]

Really?
Spending $151 million and golfing for almost a year ( 306 days) of his presidential term is 'conservative"?
Adding $8 trillion to the US debt is "conservative"?

How much did Obama spend, and how much golfing did he do, and wasn't he on the golf course when some serious stuff went down around the world involving this NATION? Seems I remember thing's. Cherry picking always comes back to bite, because all it usually becomes is political posturing trying to shame each other out of office when in reality they all got skeleton's.

 

[beagle9]

Because, make america great again, was another Trump lie.

Meanwhile Chicagoins keep on dying, and inner cities and our manufacturing base keeps on dying, prices keep on rising, trillions keep on mounting, Biden keeps on lying, and the market keeps on falling, 401s emptying, energy crisis keeps on mounting, cultural rot on the fast track, the world in disorder, our military weakening, and people like you keep on defending the indefensible.

 

[Godboy]

You are mistakem. If they suport stolen election fantasies, they are MAGA. Those fantasies are one of the main defining charactoristics of a MAGA.

There are TONS of democrats who fit that description. In fact, id venture to bet that i can find more examples of high level democrat politicians denying election results than republicans.

 

[Correll]

Hanging out? WTF? You, them and everyone else on this board are nothing but words on a screen to me. You take politics way, way too personally. If anyone here has the power to make you feel scared or angry it is you who gave them that power. Do like I do. If the posters here are getting on your nerves find something else to do. They are just words on a screen. Never give anyone the satisfaction of knowing they have gotten under your skin. You should have learned that ages ago.

If you don't want me to take pollitics personally, then perhaps you should stop with the personal attacks over political issues.


I mean, seriously, why did you say wacist that first time? Were you being serious, or was it more of a reflex? Were you knowingly talking shit?

 

[occupied]

If you don't want me to take pollitics personally, then perhaps you should stop with the personal attacks over political issues.


I mean, seriously, why did you say wacist that first time? Were you being serious, or was it more of a reflex? Were you knowingly talking shit?

I said racist because MAGA is primarily a panicked reaction to demographic and ideological shifts in this country that threaten the long-held electoral supremacy of white people.

 

[Correll]

I said racist because MAGA is primarily a panicked reaction to demographic and ideological shifts in this country that threaten the long-held electoral supremacy of white people.

Ideological shift? So, the demographich change is a leading to a real political and policy change(s)?


Thus, the change is not solely on of the color of people's skins, so opposing it, is not inherently wacist.


And "electional supremacy of white people"? How did that manifest? Was that the cause of the massive war we fought to free none white people? Or perhaps it was the cause of the civil rights movement, which won it's battles when America was massively more white? Almost like it is not a real thing. ie, it is not a real thing.

 

[Anathema]

The principles this country were founded on were slavery, sexism and elitism

You say that like it’s a BAD thing???

 

[22lcidw]

I said racist because MAGA is primarily a panicked reaction to demographic and ideological shifts in this country that threaten the long-held electoral supremacy of white people.

Democrats crossed that line many years and decades ago. Voting Democrat is not of that party anymore as it is now Progressive Socialist and the real extremists who let radicals take over their party with the help of Republican indifferences.

 

[occupied]

Ideological shift? So, the demographich change is a leading to a real political and policy change(s)?


Thus, the change is not solely on of the color of people's skins, so opposing it, is not inherently wacist.


And "electional supremacy of white people"? How did that manifest? Was that the cause of the massive war we fought to free none white people? Or perhaps it was the cause of the civil rights movement, which won it's battles when America was massively more white? Almost like it is not a real thing. ie, it is not a real thing.

Whatever, haven't seen a MAGA-tard yet willing to examine what your movement looks like to the people you target.

 

[Correll]

Whatever, haven't seen a MAGA-tard yet willing to examine what your movement looks like to the people you target.

"LOOKS LIKE"? So, the moment we start discussing your claims of wacism, seriously and honestly, now you want to change the discussion to the PERCEPTION other people have of us, instead of the reality of the issue(s)?

And "target"? Can you drop the spin games?


I thank you for bringing up the issue that the demographic shift is a real political and ideological change for this country.


Opposing political and ideological changes, is a valid political position. It is on those wanting the change to make teh case that the change is for the better. Cryhing WACISM, is not a valid way of doing that.



I have never seen any libtard make the case that this change is one for the better, for America or Americans especially.


Also, I would be happy to discuss how we look to an group of people you want, and I will be/would be pointing out that that it is mosly based on lies. Such as crying wacism.

 

[occupied]

"LOOKS LIKE"? So, the moment we start discussing your claims of wacism, seriously and honestly, now you want to change the discussion to the PERCEPTION other people have of us, instead of the reality of the issue(s)?

And "target"? Can you drop the spin games?


I thank you for bringing up the issue that the demographic shift is a real political and ideological change for this country.


Opposing political and ideological changes, is a valid political position. It is on those wanting the change to make teh case that the change is for the better. Cryhing WACISM, is not a valid way of doing that.



I have never seen any libtard make the case that this change is one for the better, for America or Americans especially.


Also, I would be happy to discuss how we look to an group of people you want, and I will be/would be pointing out that that it is mosly based on lies. Such as crying wacism.

Start spelling RACISM correctly or fuck off. If you don't want to be thought of as a racist it's pretty simple. Quit ridiculing the people who have a serious problem with all the real provable white supremacists that seem to be Trump's most devoted followers and none of you seem to have a problem with. Until the right tells these people to take a hike in no uncertain terms you will just have to endure guilt by association.

 

[Correll]

Start spelling RACISM correctly or fuck off. If you don't want to be thought of as a racist it's pretty simple. Quit ridiculing the people who have a serious problem with all the real provable white supremacists that seem to be Trump's most devoted followers and none of you seem to have a problem with. Until the right tells these people to take a hike in no uncertain terms you will just have to endure guilt by association.

W.S. are an insignificant fringe, numbering in teh tens of thousands. THey are not Trump's "most devoted followers".

You've admitted that hte demographic shift is causing a real political and ideological change in this soceity.


The case for htat change was never made. Instead people lied and said that there would be no change, and when the change became obviously true, people started crying RACISM, instead of explaining why the change was for the good, in their opinon.


Even if you were to offer to make the case, it wouldn't be enough, because our society is moving forward based on a change that was sold on lies and is being defending with... the Race Card.

Do you like the ideological changes it is causing? Or support them?

 

[occupied]

W.S. are an insignificant fringe, numbering in teh tens of thousands. THey are not Trump's "most devoted followers".

You've admitted that hte demographic shift is causing a real political and ideological change in this soceity.


The case for htat change was never made. Instead people lied and said that there would be no change, and when the change became obviously true, people started crying RACISM, instead of explaining why the change was for the good, in their opinon.


Even if you were to offer to make the case, it wouldn't be enough, because our society is moving forward based on a change that was sold on lies and is being defending with... the Race Card.

Do you like the ideological changes it is causing? Or support them?

Social change is a constant. Trying to stand against it has always been a losing battle. Those of us who can easily adapt to changing times and new social trends do not feel your fear. Since so much social change over our lifetimes has involved race why are you so dumbfounded over charges of racism when white men still stand in so many doorways shaking their heads? You have lost nothing by another man getting the same as you and yet the right always lines up behind continuing inequality.

 

[beagle9]

I said racist because MAGA is primarily a panicked reaction to demographic and ideological shifts in this country that threaten the long-held electoral supremacy of white people.

So in your mind, is it that you see blacks or brown skinned people by way of the Democrat party, eventually displacing white held positions of power, and long held white cultural traditions that accompanied and encompassed all races on the ride along throughout time(?), and so it is that you think that the MAGA crowd is the last hold outs of resistance in the situation ???? Is that the way you are viewing it all as pertaining to the rhetoric you spew here ?

 

[beagle9]

Social change is a constant. Trying to stand against it has always been a losing battle. Those of us who can easily adapt to changing times and new social trends do not feel your fear. Since so much social change over our lifetimes has involved race why are you so dumbfounded over charges of racism when white men still stand in so many doorways shaking their heads? You have lost nothing by another man getting the same as you and yet the right always lines up behind continuing inequality.

Forced social change, ummm is that a constant, and is it always good social change when it is forced ?

 

[BlackSand]

.

Simply a Desperate call for the Establishment to Unite.

,​

 

[occupied]

So in your mind, is it that you see blacks or brown skinned people by way of the Democrat party, eventually displacing white held positions of power, and long held white cultural traditions that accompanied and encompassed all races on the ride along throughout time(?), and so it is that you think that the MAGA crowd is the last hold outs of resistance in the situation ???? Is that the way you are viewing it all as pertaining to the rhetoric you spew here ?

Yes. The right saw that black man in the White House and lost their fucking minds.