Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Who is the baron?[
If they are paying then you are selling. That's business not religion.
I will pay you $7.25 per hour to put a new roof on my house.
DO IT PEASANT.
You must, because I demand it!
Fucking Communist morons. If one is compelled to labor against their will, then one is a slave.
All the left is, or ever has been, is a return to Feudalism.
[
Honey, if I ever post anything you approve of it will worry me considerably, thanks!
Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
It depends.
On who wins.
.
And another post with the depth of wall paper.
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
They wanted a limited government that was subjected to we the people. They did not want us to be subjects to the government.Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
It depends.
On who wins.
.
[
Honey, if I ever post anything you approve of it will worry me considerably, thanks!
If that should ever happen, it will be proof that DailyKOS is under new management, and more rational....
They wanted a limited government that was subjected to we the people. They did not want us to be subjects to the government.Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
It depends.
On who wins.
.
Fucking tool.
I get it, your little socialist style of government is upon us.
The Republic is pretty much dead. Remember the days when we could say "hey you guys?"
Let us do away with checks and balances. Let us make sure enough people are promised free shit. Yeah, I wonder who the perpetual ignorant would vote for. The ones that enslave their minds by giving them free stuff, or the ones that promote personal responsibility and accountability?
Fuck you socialists.
"What's Best for the Establishment Is Best for All You Worthless Little People Too!"This is a republic not a democracy.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
Yes, after the election.
Let the people decide - it's a concept you leftists cannot grasp.
We should never trust them. Never. That is the entire point of a constitutional republic.I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.
I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket
"I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS."
"On May 18, then-future Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump put out a list of 11 individuals, all sitting judges, who he would consider as a potential replacement for Antonin Scalia, whodied unexpectedly last February, on the Supreme Court of the United States. Trump has now added 10 new names to that list.
As was the case with his original list, the men and women who have been added appear to be eminently qualified to sit on the high court. Nine of these individuals (Mike Lee, Thomas Lee, Allison Eid, Raymond Kethledge, Joan Larsen, David Stras, Margaret Ryan, Neil Gorsuch, and Steven Colloton) clerked for Supreme Court justices, and several others held distinguished clerkships as well."
A Conservative Take on Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee List
What's the beef???
the thing between the sides of the bun.
as yet, he hasn't made a selection, and he has a history of changing his mind on things
I trust neither candidate to be the resident of the Oval Office
[
"What's Best for the Establishment Is Best for All You Worthless Little People Too!"
This is a democracy, not a republic. Just because you have some guillotine-fodder oligarchs backing you up doesn't make your claim more logical.
Looks like I'll have to Robin Hood, but I would prefer a more manly name.....
Those are the ones that count most though...Old George, he inherited his from his new wife.....They wanted a limited government that was subjected to we the people. They did not want us to be subjects to the government.Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
It depends.
On who wins.
.
Fucking tool.
I get it, your little socialist style of government is upon us.
The Republic is pretty much dead. Remember the days when we could say "hey you guys?"
Let us do away with checks and balances. Let us make sure enough people are promised free shit. Yeah, I wonder who the perpetual ignorant would vote for. The ones that enslave their minds by giving them free stuff, or the ones that promote personal responsibility and accountability?
Fuck you socialists.
Your founders left out everyone except titled, property holding white males.
Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.
It depends.
On who wins.
.
And another post with the depth of wall paper.
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
Ha ha ha, yeah, that'll work out well.
See,,, sitting at home you have an opportunity to use that 100,000 dollar US education sheepskin...Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.
And another post with the depth of wall paper.
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
Ha ha ha, yeah, that'll work out well.
Well....I see the problem you'd face: the Constitution is in English, not a tongue you're familiar with.
I believe it was just yesterday that I had to correct your posts...what....five,six times?
Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.
And another post with the depth of wall paper.
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
Ha ha ha, yeah, that'll work out well.
Well....I see the problem you'd face: the Constitution is in English, not a tongue you're familiar with.
I believe it was just yesterday that I had to correct your posts...what....five,six times?
See,,, sitting at home you have an opportunity to use that 100,000 dollar US education sheepskin...Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?And another post with the depth of wall paper.
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
Ha ha ha, yeah, that'll work out well.
Well....I see the problem you'd face: the Constitution is in English, not a tongue you're familiar with.
I believe it was just yesterday that I had to correct your posts...what....five,six times?
Looks like I'll have to Robin Hood, but I would prefer a more manly name.....
Another stupid coded socialist comment. Trust this everyone. This fucking tool, who is preaching a "working government" is not using his own term. He saw that on one of the soros sites and it "makes sense" to the asshole.I had my say. The Founders wanted a working government and not what we have now thanks to the GOP.Do you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.
It depends.
On who wins.
.
And another post with the depth of wall paper.
Let's stick to reality and knowledge...areas where you fall short.
The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.
Bill's wife:
....the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Now....what were you saying?
Unfortunately we don't have Statesmen anymore.Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.Well, maybe.Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?
It depends.
On who wins.
.
See,,, sitting at home you have an opportunity to use that 100,000 dollar US education sheepskin...Nine Power-Hungry Legal VulturesDo you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?
They didn't want judicial review, obviously, because SCROTUS didn't do anything about that until after 12 years of legislation that they could have interfered with if that power had been given to them in the Constitution. Taking the Preamble at its word, only we, the people, can interpret the Constitution.
Ha ha ha, yeah, that'll work out well.
Well....I see the problem you'd face: the Constitution is in English, not a tongue you're familiar with.
I believe it was just yesterday that I had to correct your posts...what....five,six times?
Eh, I wouldn't pay her any mind at all, she's clearly lost hers.
