It's Not Us...It's Him

[PoliticalChic]

Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?

Well, maybe. It depends. On who wins.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.
They aren't.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.

I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket

Trump already has a list of people he would nominate and even establishment Republicans have praised his choices along with the candidates he defeated.

His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows.

No doubt this is simply a dunce repeating what his masters tell him to.

Pick the ones you'd object to...and tell why.

 

[Frank'sRules]

Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?

Well, maybe. It depends. On who wins.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

 

[Frank'sRules]

I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.

I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket

Trump already has a list of people he would nominate and even establishment Republicans have praised his choices along with the candidates he defeated.

His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows.

No doubt this is simply a dunce repeating what his masters tell him to.

Pick the ones you'd object to...and tell why.

Why would I care who the hell he picked? His list doesn't matter a damn.

 

[Auld Phart]

Well, maybe. It depends. On who wins.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

 

[Frank'sRules]

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

What a shame for you that in our one nation we have but one president. Like it or not.

You could always move to another country? Need boxes?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?

Well, maybe.

It depends.

On who wins.




.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

And another post with the depth of wall paper.

Do you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?

Let's stick to reality and knowledge...areas where you fall short.

The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

Bill's wife:
....the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Now....what were you saying?

 

[Auld Phart]

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

What a shame for you that in our one nation we have but one president. Like it or not.

You could always move to another country? Need boxes?

Don't worry, I have the boxes you didn't use when Bush was elected the second time

 

[Frank'sRules]

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

What a shame for you that in our one nation we have but one president. Like it or not.

You could always move to another country? Need boxes?

Don't worry, I have the boxes you didn't use when Bush was elected the second time

That mattered to me hardly at all. And the same applies now. Life goes on for me but maybe not for you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.

I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket

"I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS."


"On May 18, then-future Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump put out a list of 11 individuals, all sitting judges, who he would consider as a potential replacement for Antonin Scalia, whodied unexpectedly last February, on the Supreme Court of the United States. Trump has now added 10 new names to that list.

As was the case with his original list, the men and women who have been added appear to be eminently qualified to sit on the high court. Nine of these individuals (Mike Lee, Thomas Lee, Allison Eid, Raymond Kethledge, Joan Larsen, David Stras, Margaret Ryan, Neil Gorsuch, and Steven Colloton) clerked for Supreme Court justices, and several others held distinguished clerkships as well."
A Conservative Take on Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee List



What's the beef???

the thing between the sides of the bun.

as yet, he hasn't made a selection, and he has a history of changing his mind on things

I trust neither candidate to be the resident of the Oval Office

1. "The common wisdom holds that 'both parties' have to appeal to the extremes during the primary and then move to the center for the general election. To the contrary, both parties run for office as conservatives. Once they have fooled the voters and are safely in office, Republicans sometimes double-cross the voters. Democrats always do."
   Coulter, 11-27-03

 

[Frank'sRules]

Wait, what! We're gonna start filling vacancies again?

Well, maybe.

It depends.

On who wins.




.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

And another post with the depth of wall paper.

Do you think the Founders wanted a do-nothing Congress and Supreme Court?

Let's stick to reality and knowledge...areas where you fall short.

The Founders envisioned a nation based on individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

Bill's wife:
....the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Now....what were you saying?

I had my say. The Founders wanted a working government and not what we have now thanks to the GOP.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well, maybe. It depends. On who wins.

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

Wow!

I'm right again!

Just as I said:

A dunce who voted for the abject, utter failure in the White House.



Wanna see his record of success?
It's as long as Bill's wifes' record of achievements.
And as small a number as the points in your IQ.

 

[Frank'sRules]

Just like the Founders would have wanted. Oh wait, they wanted a government that functioned. Never mid.

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

Wow!

I'm right again!

Just as I said:

A dunce who voted for the abject, utter failure in the White House.



Wanna see his record of success?
It's as long as Bill's wifes' record of achievements.
And as small a number as the points in your IQ.

Your partisan nonsense doesn't interest me.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.

I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket

Trump already has a list of people he would nominate and even establishment Republicans have praised his choices along with the candidates he defeated.

His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows.

No doubt this is simply a dunce repeating what his masters tell him to.

Pick the ones you'd object to...and tell why.

Why would I care who the hell he picked? His list doesn't matter a damn.

Because you're an imbecile.

You made this comment about his list...

"His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows."

And now I made you admit you're clueless about same.

 

[Frank'sRules]

I wouldn't trust Trump to select someone with a legal background for SCOTUS.

I wouldn't trust Hillary to select someone she didn't have in her very wide and deep pocket

Trump already has a list of people he would nominate and even establishment Republicans have praised his choices along with the candidates he defeated.

His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows.

No doubt this is simply a dunce repeating what his masters tell him to.

Pick the ones you'd object to...and tell why.

Why would I care who the hell he picked? His list doesn't matter a damn.

Because you're an imbecile.

You made this comment about his list...

"His list is roughly as valid as his marriage vows."

And now I made you admit you're clueless about same.

#2 - Why would I care who the hell he picked? His list doesn't matter a damn.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

What a shame for you that in our one nation we have but one president. Like it or not.

You could always move to another country? Need boxes?

Don't worry, I have the boxes you didn't use when Bush was elected the second time

That mattered to me hardly at all. And the same applies now. Life goes on for me but maybe not for you?

Please verify- you're fine with this:
....the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The reason for supporting Trump is the Supreme Court nominations, and his vision for America, e.g., individualism vs the lock-step collectivist statism of the communism/lite Democrats.

Good reasons.

At the least, he claims to support the Constitution.


But...the abysmal performance....the totally unexpected phoned-it-in performance at the debate gave many of us pause.
What the heck is going on????





The astute Michael Goodwin of the NYPost, writes this:

1. "Trump is Twitter fighting a former beauty queen....Trump’s latest screwball turn, some believe it proves he doesn’t want to win the White House. Their theory holds that the possibility of victory must terrify him, so he is intentionally making himself unelectable.

2. ...they point to his habit of self-destructing just when things look best. Then as now, Trump pushed the race to almost even before taking a detour to wage a fight that made no sense.

3. ....after his stunning run to the nomination and after a solid convention, Trump had nearly tied Hillary Clinton in the polls.Then he launched a Twitter fight with the Khans, a Gold Star, Muslim family.
...the Khan story would have gone away if Trump had let it. He couldn’t and wouldn’t, trading Twitter barbs with the parents for days and foolishly escalating the stakes in interviews.

In fact, it was a political trap. He didn’t just take the bait, he swallowed it, hook, line and sinker, then asked for more.



4. Voters were turned off, ...Clinton opened a big lead nationally and was ahead in all 11 battleground states followed by Politico. After one estimate that she might win 400 electoral votes, I wrote that Trump faced “a crushing landslide that would turn his name into a political punchline and make his brand synonymous with loser.”



5. Trump must do everything in his power if he wants to beat Clinton
In fact, he already was starting the long climb back. He had shaken up his team, started reading serious policy speeches from a teleprompter and was punching up at Clinton instead of punching down at bereft parents.

It took six weeks of message and personal discipline, and by last week’s debate, the race was a dead heat. .... In the most dramatic development, Clinton looked to be conceding Ohio.



6. Then Bad Trump, like a monster from the “vasty deep,” suddenly surfaced. His target this time was Alicia Machado, the 1996 winner of the Miss Universe pageant. Back then, Trump called her “Miss Piggy” and “an eating machine” after she gained weight.

.... Trump lunged for the lure and began a self-defeating insult war.

7. Compounding a debate performance where Trump missed golden opportunities, his bizarre behavior exacted a price. The first polls show he is back on a road to defeat, and the damage is likely just beginning. He’ll keep core supporters, but he’s making it very hard for undecided voters to back him.



8. Clinton isn’t saying much, in keeping with the maxim to step aside when your opponent is committing political suicide. Some call her lucky, but her luck is the kind the late baseball executive Branch Rickey described as the “residue of design.” The way Clinton and her team used the Khans and Machado amounts to a clinic on how to exploit an opponent’s weakness.



9. .... the only way she could win. Burdened by scandals, branded a liar, suffering a charisma deficit and hobbled by health issues, she is making Trump an unacceptable alternative.

Still, she couldn’t do it without his help.


10. ... he is beating himself.....if the armchair shrinks are correct that he fears victory, Trump would always find a way to secure defeat.

Then again, a deep dive into his psyche may not be necessary. His behavior could be proof that Clinton and the NeverTrumpers were right all along — that he’s not temperamentally fit to be president.

Whatever the reason for his conduct, we could be witnessing the beginning of the end."
Trump has a winning message but he’s failing to deliver | New York Post

You say Trump has a winning message? lol, you the free trader, the neocon, the anti-adulterer?

Funny. See how funny the Trumptards are?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What ARE you, a COMMIE???
.

The owner of common sense. A rare thing these days.

Commons sense is what tells one that two plumb lines are parallel.


You're really a dunce, aren't you.
Bet you voted for the supreme failure in the White House.

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

Wow!

I'm right again!

Just as I said:

A dunce who voted for the abject, utter failure in the White House.



Wanna see his record of success?
It's as long as Bill's wifes' record of achievements.
And as small a number as the points in your IQ.

Your partisan nonsense doesn't interest me.

Nor does education, knowledge, nor experience.

Clearly, a reliable Democrat voter.


Better get back to greeting the folks who make Walmart profitable.

 

[saveliberty]

Your partisan nonsense doesn't interest me.

Ironic post is ironic,

 

[Frank'sRules]

I voted for the person who beat the person you were voting for, twice. And now for the third act, Madam President.

May be your damn president, wont' be mine

What a shame for you that in our one nation we have but one president. Like it or not.

You could always move to another country? Need boxes?

Don't worry, I have the boxes you didn't use when Bush was elected the second time

That mattered to me hardly at all. And the same applies now. Life goes on for me but maybe not for you?

Please verify- you're fine with this:
....the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.

Why would I be fine with that? That's not liberalism.