It’s official: Trump agrees there was an insurrection - Video from today

[dudmuck]

/----/ I stopped reading at the links first distortion:
"In classic Trump fashion, he claimed in his New Hampshire primary victory speech Jan. 23 that Democrats used the COVID-19 pandemic to "cheat" in the 2020 presidential election. Unsurprisingly to our regular readers, his claim was Pants on Fire."
It's not a lie if Trump truly believes it. 70 million of his supporters believe it too. How many "regular readers" does PolitiFact have? And why are their opinions more valid than Trump's? Do you think PolitiFact is evenly read by liberals and conservatives, or heavily weighted to the Left? The sentence: Unsurprisingly to our regular readers, his claim was Pants on Fire. suggests that the outcome was already predicted because their readers are liberals who already hate Trump.

You should start with your strongest argument. And this is the best you have?

Finally, In 2021, they (Politifact) was moved to Left-Center Biased by MBFC based on grading conservatives more harshly than democrats.

The 10 Best Fact-Checkers for 2021

By Dave Van Zandt - Editor - Media Bias Fact Check Media Bias Fact Check relies on signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and those

mediabiasfactcheck.com

LET'S GO SWIFTIES

Many states changed procedures in 2020 to make it easier to vote by mail during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some states loosened restrictions that required voters to provide excuses for using mail ballots. Other states sent mail ballots or mail ballot applications to all registered voters.

no cheating there at all.

Take a look at all the lies of Joe Biden they have on politifact, even pants of fire lies from Biden. And Obama pants on fire also.

 

[citygator]

Dang, you are manic over this -
Why?

Oh yeah -

Nine Justices destroyed the idea that President Trump should not be allowed on the Presidential election ballot.
The Government itself officially declared that the current President presented as too feeble and frail to be seen as competent.

I get it Gator - carry on son.

AND THERE WE ARE... we have now moved from "He didnt say that".. to "What he meant was IF" to now "its no big deal"...

 

[Couchpotato]

The debate is over. It was an insurrection. Donald Trump was either struck by lightening or has dementia.

3..2…1… til his Supreme Court lawyers quit.

But I thought he was an idiot?

 

[Couchpotato]

View attachment 899349

You do understand that those 2 statements can both be true at the same time.

You think it's in insurrection does that mean you participated in any act that could plausibly be characterized as an insurrection?

 

[Foolardi]

The debate is over. It was an insurrection. Donald Trump was either struck by lightening or has dementia.

3..2…1… til his Supreme Court lawyers quit.

J6 is now referred to as " Insurrection day ".
However J6 is not nor ever can be defined as an
Insurrection.Cannot have an Insurrection w/o deadly
weapons.Not Poss-eee-Bow.
Not one firearm was used of collected on January 6th,2021.
It would be like assuming there was an armed Bank heist
because the costumes used in the heist { Batman and Robin }
or The Joker had metal in the body of their costumes.

 

[Foolardi]

You do understand that those 2 statements can both be true at the same time.

You think it's in insurrection does that mean you participated in any act that could plausibly be characterized as an insurrection?

Stop trying to prove something that is not provable.
Just because one Political Party { Democrats } are infintile
brats of the first order.Lying about almost anything and everything.
Especially when they have their plate full defending against
Joe Biden's condition.Not that he's elderly.But :
Infirmed ... Like totally.

 

[Billiejeens]

AND THERE WE ARE... we have now moved from "He didnt say that".. to "What he meant was IF" to now "its no big deal"...

This is way beyond your normal ridiculous trolling.
What minuscule little point are you trying to make?
What is the relevance and why?

 

[citygator]

You do understand that those 2 statements can both be true at the same time.

You think it's in insurrection does that mean you participated in any act that could plausibly be characterized as an insurrection?

We used to disagree on two points. 1. Was it an insurrection. 2. Who was responsible. You have now moved over to our way of thinking on 1. It was an insurrection. You'll come around on 2 soon. It was Donald who is responsible.

 

[Billiejeens]

Stop trying to prove something that is not provable.
Just because one Political Party { Democrats } are infintile
brats of the first order.Lying about almost anything and everything.
Especially when they have their plate full defending against
Joe Biden's condition.Not that he's elderly.But :
Infirmed ... Like totally.

He is either qualified to defend himself in a court of law, subsequent to his Presidency, or he is qualified to be removed from office via the 25th amendment.

 

[Phactotum]

The debate is over. It was an insurrection. Donald Trump was either struck by lightening or has dementia.

3..2…1… til his Supreme Court lawyers quit.

You are being very deceitful here. Which is why you didn't post all of Trump's words re: Nancy Pelosi and an "insurrection" that day.

What you pulled in creating this thread, is the EXACT same thing Jack Smith did by leaving out these words in order to charge Trump with crimes. The entire Democratic Party deserves to be charged with treason.

 

[Billiejeens]

You are being very deceitful here. Which is why you didn't post all of Trump's words re: Nancy Pelosi and an "insurrection" that day.

What you pulled in creating this thread, is the EXACT same thing Jack Smith did by leaving out these words in order to charge Trump with crimes. The entire Democratic Party deserves to be charged with treason.

When the facts are clearly on one's side- they present the facts.
When they are not on their side - they present something else.

 

[Foolardi]

We used to disagree on two points. 1. Was it an insurrection. 2. Who was responsible. You have now moved over to our way of thinking on 1. It was an insurrection. You'll come around on 2 soon. It was Donald who is responsible.

You make about as much sense as a grass slug deciding it
needs a vacation from it's current locale.Said slug wants to
take a trip to an exotic isle and bask in the heady sun.
Why oh why did Pelosi and her Stalin-laced J6 Committee
never { not once } play back what Trump said { emphasized }
" Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard. "

 

[Couchpotato]

We used to disagree on two points. 1. Was it an insurrection. 2. Who was responsible. You have now moved over to our way of thinking on 1. It was an insurrection. You'll come around on 2 soon. It was Donald who is responsible.

No im just pointing out how stupid your assertion is even if one believed the first claim that an insurrection occurred.

 

[Moonglow]

Your boy at the Supreme Court today got spanked in public. Democrats humiliated. More to come. Better find a towel for all your tears.

Actually, the act was to clarify a misunderstanding of the 14th...

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

His exact words. So funny that you guys wont even believe your own ears. He has you all so well trained to blow him all day.

Well, Trump did coach his cult.

People Are Comparing This Trump Quote to George Orwell​

Time Magazine
https://time.com › Politics › White House
Jul 24, 2018 — Trump drew George Orwell comparisons when he said in a speech: "What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening."

 

[Catsnmeters]

J6 is now referred to as " Insurrection day ".
However J6 is not nor ever can be defined as an
Insurrection.Cannot have an Insurrection w/o deadly
weapons.Not Poss-eee-Bow.
Not one firearm was used of collected on January 6th,2021.
It would be like assuming there was an armed Bank heist
because the costumes used in the heist { Batman and Robin }
or The Joker had metal in the body of their costumes.

Can you link the definition of insurrection that says guns have to be used?

 

[Foolardi]

When the facts are clearly on one's side- they present the facts.
When they are not on their side - they present something else.

who be the " they ". I tink it better to use :
- Them! - { 1954 } Classic early Horror Sci-fi where Giant
Man-eating monster Ants who mutated from exposure
to early Desert atomic tests are found.
With their super weezie high pitch noise.

 

[Foolardi]

Actually, the act was to clarify a misunderstanding of the 14th...

The only as in THE only thing Demobrats are capable of clarifying
is an almost Alien use of Destroying One leader and his flock.
While Kowtowing to the most undeserving Americans known to
this Great Land.Thinking just spouting out MAGA this MaGa that
cuts the mustard.
I think even a true lover of Mustard like W.C.Fields and his
frankfurters would loose step juggling day after day in a
world of Democrat driven carny barkers and shills.

 

[Moonglow]

The only as in THE only thing Demobrats are capable of clarifying
is an almost Alien use of Destroying One leader and his flock.
While Kowtowing to the most undeserving Americans known to
this Great Land.Thinking just spouting out MAGA this MaGa that
cuts the mustard.
I think even a true lover of Mustard like W.C.Fields and his
frankfurters would loose step juggling day after day in a
world of Democrat driven carny barkers and shills.

Depends if there are chips or fries.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Would need to see the full context, and it looks like the video has been spliced.

But since Trump was kind enough to define insurrection in his own words, not sure that will help.him.