toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Apr 29, 2017
- 75,253
- 70,413
Undermining the power of the federal government is just a bonus.
That is because at least 80% of what the Fed does it has illegally usurped from the states!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Undermining the power of the federal government is just a bonus.
It is a crime against humanity that little beast Fauci and his Deep State prevented use of alternative remedies for the flu Fauci financed.
Folks, unless you get out in the sun everyday for at least a half hour with your face, etc. exposed you need D3 supplementation. I take Garden of Life 5,000 IU and blood test confirms I am in the desirable range despite not being in the sun for months. D3 is very important for the immune system to defend against assorted toxins like the Fauci Jabs and the Fauci Flu itself.
Tell that to the 240million folks in India.Ivermectin doesn't help with COVID.
tagging the jabs as a cure is false as well. . .Zero problems with that approach. However tagging it as a cure for covid is false.
Those decriminalizing pot are mostly democrat run and democrat approved. This administration has been extremely opposed to Ivermectin as a recognized, legal treatment for Covid so it's apples and oranges.A lot of states have made Mary Jane legal while the federal government keeps it a 100% illegal schedule 1 narcotic...
If we can do that, this should be a cake walk by comparison.
Undermining the power of the federal government is just a bonus.
The vaccines were never intended to be a cure.tagging the jabs as a cure is false as well. . .
There's little if any doubt at all about that to anyone who was paying attention to what deaths were being counted as Covid deaths many of which never had a Covid test or diagnosis, and many more who died of other causes but were positive for Covid.The death-number disparity could be a result of inflated death reports in Illinois, etc.
Ivermectin is, literally, a miracle drug...it was touted as such for decades before Covid.Still haven't answered my question. Why..do..you..tout..this..as..a..miracle..cure?
I know the answer already. So be honest.![]()
Musta been a lot of mail-in deaths.There's little if any doubt at all about that to anyone who was paying attention to what deaths were being counted as Covid deaths many of which never had a Covid test or diagnosis, and many more who died of other causes but were positive for Covid.
Unfortunately since The number of Covid Cases and deaths a state had there was a lot of fraud committed.
They were intended to;The vaccines were never intended to be a cure.
No, the were designed to reduce transmission and give your body the ability to fight the disease thereby reducing deaths as well as reducing new infections in people who'd already had the disease and all the data shows they were 85-90% effective at doing so.They were intended to;
A) Prevent infection. ..
B) Prevent transmission.
Now? Their only claim to fame? Is to keep you from potentially dying if you have a comorbidity.
SO? Smoke all you want, sit on your ass, and keep eating them cheese burgers, just as long as you get your jab. . . taking big pharma's concoctions is now the way to a healthy life style.
![]()
The data is hopelessly garbled due to the fraud involved nit to mention the fact that the shit tests give positive covid results for every form of covid.No, the were designed to reduce transmission and give your body the ability to fight the disease thereby reducing deaths as well as reducing new infections in people who'd already had the disease and all the data shows they were 85-90% effective at doing so.
They were total failures at preventing transmission. Some people died as a result of being misled otherwise by this administration.No, the were designed to reduce transmission and give your body the ability to fight the disease thereby reducing deaths as well as reducing new infections in people who'd already had the disease and all the data shows they were 85-90% effective at doing so.
No they weren't, there's about a 90% reduction in breakthrough cases and transmission from those cases.They were total failures at preventing transmission. Some people died as a result of being misled otherwise by this administration.
nit to mention the fact that the shit tests give positive covid results for every form of covid.
Prevent Transmission = reduce transmissionNo, the were designed to reduce transmission and give your body the ability to fight the disease thereby reducing deaths as well as reducing new infections in people who'd already had the disease and all the data shows they were 85-90% effective at doing so.
Don't worry, our side doesn't want to mandate using it.Ivermectin doesn't help with COVID.
Prevent Transmission = reduce transmission
Prevent infection = reducing new infections
And the data DOESN'T show that. They don't reduce transmission AT ALL. Nor do they prevent folks from getting a new infection after a few weeks. They are GARBAGE.
The only people who need to get them? Maybe the elderly. . . maybe. Maybe folks with a comorbidity. But? You WILL suffer later, these destroy your passive immune system.
If you don't mind suffering from more, colds, flus, and increasing your chance of cancers? Go on then, get the jab. If you are young, and want to take a gamble with infertility? Go on, get it.
They don't work anymore. . .
Stop equivocating.
You have a serious case of Stockholm.
CDC director Rochelle Walensky now admits that the vaccine cannot prevent transmission.
CDC Director Walensky Accidentally Says "People Dying From Vax", And Other Freudian Slip Compilation
View attachment 629929
I know more people that have suffered and died from adverse events because of the jab, than have suffered and died because of COVID.And I just posted a breakdown above using the data from dozens of well done studies showing everything I said to be true.