J6 hearings not be doing that well? ... CREW to Sue

[Freedomisneverfree]

If Hillary was not stealing from the White House, she was berating Secret Service. They could not stand her!
After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china,flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for$86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Wrong again, Gigi. Keep trying, even a blind squirrel gets a nut once in a while. Uses of the presidential seal can be horrifyingly tacky, but it's not criminal

18 U.S. Code § 713 - Use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United St​

www.law.cornell.edu
(a)
Whoever knowingly displays any printed or other likeness of the great seal of the United States, or of the seals of the President or the Vice President of the United States, or the seal of the United States Senate, or the seal of the United States House of Representatives, or the seal of the United States Congress, or any facsimile thereof, in, or in connection with, any advertisement, poster, circular, book, pamphlet, or other publication, public meeting, play, motion picture, telecast, or other production, or on any building, monument, or stationery, for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Again, you have reading and comprehension problems. The word "current" is not stated nor implied.

Of course it is, or using your logic any living president could order a nuclear attack since that is something assigned to the president.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I also doubt that you witnessed the 1/7 sppee3ch.

There was a nice video of it the Jan 6th folks put out, it is now on YouTube, feel free to watch it, it is funny as hell.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I guess they better sue Amazon then eh, Gigi? Amazon.com : presidential seal

Even you cannot be this stupid.

 

[Leo123]

These dems leave no stone unturned.

I think they leave no turn unstoned.

 

[Concerned American]

a false impression of sponsorship

^^^ Tees stamped with the seal does not convey sponsorship, moron. Is Amazon guilty? Amazon.com : presidential seal

 

[Concerned American]

Even you cannot be this stupid.

Are you looking in the mirror? Tell us more about the "about 100 times" that you've denounced the J6 hearings. You're a liar and you are shitting all over yourself trying to defend your stupidity. Run along, Gigi, I hear a misinformed health care professional calling for you.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

^^^ Tees stamped with the seal does not convey sponsorship, moron. Is Amazon guilty? Amazon.com : presidential seal

Amazon is not a former president. Thus they could never convey sponsorship. And it was not just on tees, it was all over the place.

If you went to a golf tournament and saw Coke signs all over the place you would logically assume they are a sponsor.

If you went to a golf tournament and saw Marine Corps signs all over the place you would logically assume they are a sponsor.

If you went to a golf tournament and saw Air Force signs all over the place you would logically assume they are a sponsor.

The same holds true here.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Are you looking in the mirror? Tell us more about the "about 100 times" that you've denounced the J6 hearings. You're a liar and you are shitting all over yourself trying to defend your stupidity. Run along, Gigi, I hear a misinformed health care professional calling for you.

Nice rant! Your typical response, you are proven wrong and then go for the personal attacks to hide your fucking ignorance.

Well, at least you are consistent.

 

[45thPatriot]

I hope trump sues these frauds

 

[Concerned American]

Amazon is not a former president.

The law you posted said NOTHING about who uses it. Try again, moron. You democrats, and don't deny you ARE a democrat, have been reaching up your asses trying to find something on this guy for 5 1/2 years and all you've managed to do is show your childish incompetence. The worst thing about it is YOU don't even have balls enough to admit it after you do it.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The law you posted said NOTHING about who uses it. Try again, moron. You democrats, and don't deny you ARE a democrat, have been reaching up your asses trying to find something on this guy for 5 1/2 years and all you've managed to do is show your childish incompetence. The worst thing about it is YOU don't even have balls enough to admit it after you do it.

Nice rant! Your typical response, you are proven wrong and then go for the personal attacks to hide your fucking ignorance.

Well, at least you are consistent.

 

[Concerned American]

you are proven wrong

You haven't proven anything. You showed the law which, BTW, PROVED that you are barking at the moon.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You haven't proven anything. You showed the law which, BTW, PROVED that you are barking at the moon.

Nice rant! Your typical response, you are proven wrong and then go for the personal attacks to hide your fucking ignorance.

Well, at least you are consistent.

 

[Concerned American]

Thus they could never convey sponsorship.

Do you pay attention to the stupid shit you post. If Amazon could not convey sponsorship because they are not the president, how, pray tell does Trump? As you are admittedly aware, Trump is not POTUS, either. Try again moron.

 

[Concerned American]

Nice rant! Your typical response, you are proven wrong and then go for the personal attacks to hide your fucking ignorance.

Well, at least you are consistent.

Running out of bullshit eh? Now you are resorting to reposting the same crap? That is a violation of board rules, moron. Please stick to the topic. Trump DID NOT convey sponsorship of the event by the office of the president anymore than Johnson did by wearing boots with the seal on them or Trish Nixon did by wearing a ring with a seal on it or Amazon is by selling them. Do you think Amazon is conveying sponsorship because they are selling them? Like I said, keep trying, even a blind squirrel gets a nut once in a while.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Running out of bullshit eh? Now you are resorting to reposting the same crap? That is a violation of board rules, moron. Please stick to the topic. Trump DID NOT convey sponsorship of the event by the office of the president anymore than Johnson did by wearing boots with the seal on them or Trish Nixon did by wearing a ring with a seal on it or Amazon is by selling them. Do you think Amazon is conveying sponsorship because they are selling them? Like I said, keep trying, even a blind squirrel gets a nut once in a while.

Then report me you little bitch!

Nice rant! Your typical response, you are proven wrong and then go for the personal attacks to hide your fucking ignorance.

Well, at least you are consistent.

 

[Concerned American]

If you went to a golf tournament and saw Air Force signs all over the place you would logically assume they are a sponsor.

Anyone who ASSUMES has only themselves to blame. Some people might assume you had a brain until they saw one or two of your posts.

 

[Concerned American]

Then report me you little bitch!

HaHaHa, triggered, eh? What was that you were saying about personal attacks, hypocrite? Just like your constant attempts to convey that you are standing outside the political fire as an independent. You haven't got the conviction to stand for ANYTHING.