Jack Smith could face indictment

[Faun]

Because you are just trolling. Might as well be of some use.

Nope, bitchslapping you for getting schooled by your own link and your idiotic claim about precedence.

 

[meaner gene]

And same happened in 2020
Next

Wrong. The election recounts didn't change the results, so the electors did not change. The "fake" electors of 2020, are still "fake" electors.
Whereas the "fake" electors from Hawaii, became "real" electors two weeks later. And were named in the Hawaii ascertainment that was signed by the governor.

The fake 2020 electors did not have the governors signature. Which made them illegal.

 

[Lastamender]

Here ya go, crybaby...

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/trump-jan-6-indictment-2020-election/1f1c76972b25c802/full.pdf

The Defendant insinuated that more than ten thousanddeadvoters had voted
in Georgia. Just four days earlier, Georgia's Secretary of State had
explainedto the Defendantthat this was false.
The Defendant asserted that there had been 205,000 more votes than voters
in Pennsylvania . The Defendant's Acting Attorney General and Acting
Deputy Attorney General had explained to him that this was false .
The Defendant said that there had been a suspicious vote dump in Detroit,
Michigan. The Defendant's Attorney General had explained to the
Defendant that this was false, and the Defendant's allies in the Michigan state legislature.

From the indictment. That is criminalizing free speech. Notice the lame excuses that say someone told him it did not happen. Is Jack Smith trying prove something? Trump was not obligated to believe those people.

 

[Oldestyle]

Trump is corrupt and that makes your statement illogical and a lie.

Compared to who, Rye? Joe Biden? Hillary Clinton? Donald Trump isn't in the same stratosphere as those two when it comes to corruption. Joe Biden and his family have been raking in millions for decades. Trump was worth less when he left office then when he took office!

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I want to piss on their party

They're already swimming in it.

Media constantly pisses on the simpletons and tells them it's rainin'.

 

[meaner gene]

See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Their explanation relied heavily on the 1960 election between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, who was vice president at the time.

www.politico.com

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.

How about reading your own post.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

nice. you should focus on your own idiocy. absolutely no bandwidth left to white knight for racist dumb cows and terminally stupid mall cops.

just a suggestion.

I love you man.

Please don't reject me.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

LOL

There's no one in the room with you, PussyBitch. It's your own leg you're pissing on.

That's rich coming from someone who literally posted 8 times in a row with no replies.

Jesus, read the room dude haha

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I don't think you understand how the influence peddling statutes work, Mamooth.

Or - since we're on the subject - much of anything else.

Like at all.

Ever.

 

[Faun]

The Defendant insinuated that more than ten thousanddeadvoters had voted
in Georgia. Just four days earlier, Georgia's Secretary of State had
explainedto the Defendantthat this was false.
The Defendant asserted that there had been 205,000 more votes than voters
in Pennsylvania . The Defendant's Acting Attorney General and Acting
Deputy Attorney General had explained to him that this was false .
The Defendant said that there had been a suspicious vote dump in Detroit,
Michigan. The Defendant's Attorney General had explained to the
Defendant that this was false, and the Defendant's allies in the Michigan state legislature.

From the indictment. That is criminalizing free speech. Notice the lame excuses that say someone told him it did not happen. Is Jack Smith trying prove something? Trump was not obligated to believe those people.

Retard, Trump was not charged with a crime for that. I swear, you can add up the IQ of every con on this forum and still come up shy of triple digits.

 

[Oldestyle]

Or - since we're on the subject - much of anything else.

Like at all.

Ever.

The left for some reason seem to think that if the money went to other members of the Biden family OTHER than Joe that somehow that means that Joe won't be guilty of influence peddling and that simply isn't the case! If Hunter got rich off it...or James...or any of the other 7 Biden family members who all got their "cut" from the money pouring in from China, Ukraine, Russia and Romania it's still because they were selling access to Joe's political power and it's obvious that Joe knew it was going on.

 

[Faun]

That's rich coming from someone who literally posted 8 times in a row with no replies.

Jesus, read the room dude haha

Thanks for keeping track.

Who knows why anyone would bother but you be you.

 

[Lastamender]

Retard, Trump was not charged with a crime for that. I swear, you can add up the IQ of every con on this forum and still come up shy of triple digits.

It is the same thing. It is legal double talk. You are that naive?

 

[meaner gene]

The Defendant asserted that there had been 205,000 more votes than voters
in Pennsylvania . The Defendant's Acting Attorney General and Acting
Deputy Attorney General had explained to him that this was false .
The Defendant said that there had been a suspicious vote dump in Detroit,
Michigan. The Defendant's Attorney General had explained to the
Defendant that this was false,

From the indictment. That is criminalizing free speech. Notice the lame excuses that say someone told him it did not happen. Is Jack Smith trying prove something? Trump was not obligated to believe those people.

These were his own people, in charge of investigating those things. The eyes and ears the president relies on to make decisions.

You actual prove Smiths case, when you think a president chose the people he relies on to give him accurate information, and then he doesn't believe their information.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Thanks for keeping track.

Who knows why anyone would bother but you be you.

Well...I mean, it was pretty outlandish to see someone talking to themselves for 8 posts straight.

But maybe that's just me.

 

[Faun]

It is the same thing. It is legal double talk. You are that naive?

FruitLoops... again.... he wasn’t charged with a crime for lying. The indictment even said he had a right to lie.

 

[Lastamender]

These were his own people, in charge of investigating those things. The eyes and ears the president relies on to make decisions.

You actual prove Smiths case, when you think a president chose the people he relies on to give him accurate information, and then he doesn't believe their information.

No the were not. The states investigated nothing,.

 

[meaner gene]

FruitLoops... again.... he wasn’t charged with a crime for lying. The indictment even said he had a right to lie.

They refuse to read the indictment. So they wouldn't have seen where Smith specifically said that Trumps 1st amendment rights included telling lies.

 

[Lastamender]

FruitLoops... again.... he wasn’t charged with a crime for lying. The indictment even said he had a right to lie.

It is still about political speech. It is election interference that will put Trump back in the WH.

 

[meaner gene]

No the were not. The states investigated nothing,.

I didn't say the states investigated, I said the DOJ (and through it the FBI / US attorneys) investigated. And Trump rejected the results of their investigation.