lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 14,499
- 11,848
- 2,140
Sure, the dirty Mueller had no involvement. Just those letters he wrote to the parole boards there declaring those innocent men a danger to,society who needed to be kept locked up.
Do you actually have one of these letters? Not that these guys were ever going to be considered for parole, given what they were convicted of.
Or that over $100 million settlement the two survivors and the other families got based on MUELLER'S wrongdoings.
Except Mueller had no role in the case...
Or just ask Steven Hatfill, you know, the guy the idiot Mueller chased for years. Who got over $5 million based again on MUELLER'S illegal acts against him. History isn't kind to little Bobby.
You mean the guy who was framed by the real culprit? Seems his beef should have been with that guy, not Mueller, who again, only got involved in the case in 2006, and because of his change in direction, they identified the right guy.
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III changed leadership of the investigation in late 2006, and at that time another suspect, USAMRIID bacteriologist Bruce Ivins, became the main focus of the investigation
Robert Mueller - Wikipedia
Maybe he should send Mueller a nice thank you note..
Of course, Hatfill was a white supremacist POS from Rhodesia who lied about having a Ph.D. on his resume.
Wrong again liar. The judge in the Hatfill case blamed Mueller himself, as did EVERY agent on that case. You know, the ones who told the Mule repeatedly that he was after the WRONG guy. So you're saying Mueller was so stupid he couldn't see the a "framing" right in front of his face? Mueller was involved in Hatfill's case and the judge rightly slapped him hard. Leaving US taxpayers with a $5 million bill because of his incompetence.mof course you're just a liar trying to cover for incompetent Bob. Maybe try actually reading about cases before looking like a fool. Oh, too late for that.