Logic. Islam lacks it hence so few Nobel Prize winners
So where's your Nobel Prize?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Logic. Islam lacks it hence so few Nobel Prize winners
Aw boo-hoo. The FBI didn’t answer the questions you had.Was Ray Epps mentioned in second 20? I am Talking about that generic question. Grow up, not my problem
What made the question not generic? Grow up. Epps wasn’t mentioned.What you consider a generic question isn’t my problem.
This thread isn’t about Trump you Jew hating shrew. It’s about the FBI. Keep upOh yes it is. Trump is still trying to undermine our elections and claiming he's president.
Why? Do you want to kill me for it? Ha ha ha ha boomSo where's your Nobel Prize?
So now you admit they dodged because the answer was YES. I accept Your surrender, leftist.Aw boo-hoo. The FBI didn’t answer the questions you had.
Welcome to reality.
Asking the FBI to reveal something about how they operated doesn’t sound generic to me. More importantly, I recognize that we don’t get to access that information just because we want it.What made the question not generic? Grow up. Epps wasn’t mentioned.
Whatever you need to tell yourself.So now you admit they dodged because the answer was YES. I accept Your surrender, leftist.
Presumably, quite a bit.What is the FBI hiding?
Democrats brought him in to secretly question him behind closed doors in January. The purpose of the meeting was specifically "to debunk the conspiracy theory that Ray Epps is a fed". They had him in person, they questioned him, yet they didnt debunk shit. They havent said a god damn word about that meeting since it happened. So what the fuck happened? Why hasnt this been debunked by now? They had all the time in the world to do so.I made the point because this is a conspiracy theory. It's already been addressed.
Even Ray Epps said it was bullshit. LOL. So Ted Cruz here looks like even more of a moron than he is.
![]()
New Evidence Undercuts Jan. 6 Instigator Conspiracy Theory (Published 2022)
Recordings released to defense lawyers directly challenge assertions by prominent Republicans that an Arizona man named Ray Epps was a federal informant and helped start the Capitol riot.www.nytimes.com
What good is the Congress' oversight role if the FBI can simply say "I can't answer that" to every question?What’s more reasonable:
A) The FBI simply doesn’t want to confirm or deny anyone suspected of being an undercover agent or undercover informant.
B) Ray Epps is an undercover FBI agent. The FBI plotted to trick Trump supporters into attacking the Capitol because they wanted Trump supporters to look dumb or make Trump look bad. Trump supporters, tricked by the very clever FBI, took the bait and attacked the Capitol. The FBI, triumphant in their devious plan to make Trump supporters look dangerous, forgot that their inside man Ray Epps was one of their own. They put Ray Epps on their Most Wanted list. Then they say whoops that’s our own guy and take him off the list.
Hmmmm I’ll go with A.
Democrats brought him in to secretly question him behind closed doors in January. The purpose of the meeting was specifically "to debunk the conspiracy theory that Ray Epps is a fed". They had him in person, they questioned him, yet they didnt debunk shit. They havent said a god damn word about that meeting since it happened. So what the fuck happened? Why hasnt this been debunked by now? They had all the time in the world to do so.
Snopes?Ray Epps is a Trump supporter.
![]()
Who Is Ray Epps?
The conspiratorial claim that the attack on the U.S. Capitol was a false flag conducted by federal agents hinges largely on the identity of one man.www.snopes.com
Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, was on that panel and he says it’s a conspiracy theory.Democrats brought him in to secretly question him behind closed doors in January. The purpose of the meeting was specifically "to debunk the conspiracy theory that Ray Epps is a fed". They had him in person, they questioned him, yet they didnt debunk shit. They havent said a god damn word about that meeting since it happened. So what the fuck happened? Why hasnt this been debunked by now? They had all the time in the world to do so.
Paranoid conspiracy kooks flail about and cling to any crackpot notions serve their agenda.Democrats brought him in to secretly question him behind closed doors in January. The purpose of the meeting was specifically "to debunk the conspiracy theory that Ray Epps is a fed". They had him in person, they questioned him, yet they didnt debunk shit. They havent said a god damn word about that meeting since it happened. So what the fuck happened? Why hasnt this been debunked by now? They had all the time in the world to do so.
What good are baseless conspiracy theories?What good is the Congress' oversight role if the FBI can simply say "I can't answer that" to every question?
Your article is from before Congress even interviewed him. How the fuck would Snopes know a damn thing about this? If the theory is true and he is actually a Fed, wouldnt he present himself as a Trump supporter to gain trust? You know, have a cover story, like every undercover agent has had since the beginning of undercover agents?Ray Epps is a Trump supporter.
![]()
Who Is Ray Epps?
The conspiratorial claim that the attack on the U.S. Capitol was a false flag conducted by federal agents hinges largely on the identity of one man.www.snopes.com
Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, was on that panel and he says it’s a conspiracy theory.
“Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., has lost patience with the members of his party who continue to push the unfounded conspiracy theory that a Trump supporter named Ray Epps who encouraged demonstrators to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 was, in actuality, either an FBI agent or informant sent to stir up trouble.”
”Sorry crazies, it ain’t true” he says.
That “some dude” is Adam Kinzinger, a Republican who was on the panel with Ray Epps. Even he says you guys are crazy.Some dude saying something on Twitter doesnt mean shit to me. I prefer actual proof.![]()