whitehall
Diamond Member
Why can't sodomites respect the religious beliefs of Christians and patronize establishments that cater to hairy men in dresses?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rare pragmatism from the right.Brewer will veto the bill because she "doesn't want to take any actions that could jeopardize the economic momentum" in Arizona, a source told NBC News.
Her reasoning is hilarious.
$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy
true.
but at least this time the money was on the right side...
and she realized that the AZ boycott probably wouldn't get finished that quickly.... at least not before them losing the superbowl.
I think it's just .....
divine.![]()
Anyone who ever engaged in oral sex is a sodomite.
Anyone who ever engaged in oral sex is a sodomite.
One could just as easily say that you are backwards assed bigot thinking against Christians, and their protection under the 1st amendment. Or bigoted against those who wish to live in a culturally homogeneous (heterosexual) environment.
Should Christians also have the right to keep out Jews, on religious grounds?
Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.
LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.
Should Christians also have the right to keep out Jews, on religious grounds?
Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.
LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.
A story would NEVER pop up where the KKK went to a black bakery and ordered that because they already don't like black people, moron.
Her reasoning is hilarious.
$$ over e'rrthang, America the Corporatocracy
The NFL also issued a statement on the matter.
"Our policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation or any other improper standard," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said. "We are following the issue in Arizona and will continue to do so should the bill be signed into law, but will decline further comment at this time."
However they can close down entirely and lay off all their employees.
Absolutely. They should have the right to keep someone out because they have an ugly face. It's no ones business but the owner of the private business who he choses to and not to serve or exchange with. It's really that simple.
LOLberals like Jillian would have a cow if a story popped up in which the KKK went to an african american's bakery for a celebritory cake that read "We Hate N***ers". and she would certainly not want to force that black man to make that cake. but when the shoe is on the other foot....oh, nevermind. LOLberals are hypocrites. it's the default position.
A story would NEVER pop up where the KKK went to a black bakery and ordered that because they already don't like black people, moron.
Not only that but they would never under any circumstances identify themselves as the KKK unless it was a little old Black lady alone and there were 2 of them.
You do not have the right to someone elses services or products. The fact that you think you do lets me know you hate freedom and private property.
You do not understand the your private property rights do not trump freedom and public accomodation if you engage in business in the public forum.
Oh, I understand that Statists believe they have a right to dictate to others what they do with their own property, yes. That doesn't mean it's the ethically or morally sound position. And again, I already know you hate anything that isn't pure, unadulterated Social Statism. You love it. We know it. So lets just keep it to what it is, and not about your retarded injections, Fake.
I guess that kinda makes up for the 3 Americans she killed.
Kinda..
Here's the funny part. No conservative is screaming bloody murder for an investigation.
The Phoenix Suns and Phoenix Mercury issue the following statement regarding Arizona Senate Bill 1062: “Sports has the unique power to unite, to bring together a community without regard to individual differences. The Phoenix Suns & Phoenix Mercury are proud members of this community, and we embrace fans, families and businesses of every stripe. We are steadfastly committed to the principles of inclusivity and acceptance, and cannot support anything that is not in line with that philosophy.”
You do not understand the your private property rights do not trump freedom and public accomodation if you engage in business in the public forum.
Oh, I understand that Statists believe they have a right to dictate to others what they do with their own property, yes. That doesn't mean it's the ethically or morally sound position. And again, I already know you hate anything that isn't pure, unadulterated Social Statism. You love it. We know it. So lets just keep it to what it is, and not about your retarded injections, Fake.
Who cares what an ethically as well as constitutionally challenged individual such as you thinks. We the People and SCOTUS decides matter such as this. Don't like it? Get a majority to change the law.