Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not too concerned a candidates name, I do worry about electing Plutocrats in either D or R clothing. Hard work (as GWB used to say) isn't something a Bush or a Romney ever experience; hard work IMO is working for a nasty boss for low wages and no opportunity to advance.
Not only do Jeb Bush show his Neo Con colors by signing on with Cheney, Rumsfelt, Wolfowitz and Libby he is now changing out of his Wall Street Colors and trying to be seen as just another one of us:
"Last year, he took a step into the rarefied world of private equity and offshore investments, joining with former banking executives and a Chinese airline company to make bets on natural gas exploration and shipping. One of the funds was set up in the United Kingdom, a structure that allows the company to shield overseas investors from U.S. taxes."
Quote taken from here:
Jeb Bush shifting focus quits firm that has profited from Obamacare - LA Times
hard work IMO is working for a nasty boss for low wages and no opportunity to advance.
oh i dont know carrying a mail route during the Christmas rush and trying to get it done in 10 hours is some pretty hard work......and i was making a good buck and could have gone into management anytime......just saying....
Of course you wouldn't acknowledge any success by Obama. But let me ask this question of you:
If Obama had been in office for seven months, and had some warnings in his daily intelligence briefings of "chatter" and dismissed them ("OK, you've covered your ass"), would you or would you not have called for his impeachment?
With all the warning about Ben Ghazi, I'm surprised you would even bring it up, as if your Magic Negro didn't have his own failures to answer for.
You really are a partisan moron, but on some level you must know how truly stupid you appear to be.
Too bad he didn't keep us safe on 9/11And? Romney, McCain, Dole lost Bush 41 only won because he was Reagan's V.P. Bush 43 lost the popular vote the first time, and won the second time because was strong on fighting terrorism and kept us safe after 9/11the Republican base is not that stupid..He 's not an exciting candidate, he doesn't inspire anything. What does he stand for really? He wont get the nomination
Wait a minute. Not exciting, doesn't inspire, doesn't stand for anything?
That describes Romney to a tee.
And McCain
And Dole
And for that matter, Bush's father and brother
Too bad he didn't keep us safe on 9/11 and created ISIS by invading and occupying Iraq, using the word crusade and telling radical Muslim's to "bring it on". But hell, anyone can make a mistake.
some people keep on saying this....does anyone think that even if Clinton was still President that 9/11 would have never happened?.....the bad guys do win once in a while....
Of course you wouldn't acknowledge any success by Obama. But let me ask this question of you:
If Obama had been in office for seven months, and had some warnings in his daily intelligence briefings of "chatter" and dismissed them ("OK, you've covered your ass"), would you or would you not have called for his impeachment?
With all the warning about Ben Ghazi, I'm surprised you would even bring it up, as if your Magic Negro didn't have his own failures to answer for.
You really are a partisan moron, but on some level you must know how truly stupid you appear to be.
So does that mean you realize how much of a blunder it is to bring up "what Bush should have known" in the face of "what Obama should have known"? Or are you just all about ad hominem?
This is what I'm saying. Plus Hillary has tons of baggage, from stand by your man to Benghazi and more. If this is as good as America can do, it's in worse shape than any of us thought.
ISIS is a product of Obama's success against AQ....
Of course you wouldn't acknowledge any success by Obama. But let me ask this question of you:
If Obama had been in office for seven months, and had some warnings in his daily intelligence briefings of "chatter" and dismissed them ("OK, you've covered your ass"), would you or would you not have called for his impeachment?
With all the warning about Ben Ghazi, I'm surprised you would even bring it up, as if your Magic Negro didn't have his own failures to answer for.
You really are a partisan moron, but on some level you must know how truly stupid you appear to be.
So does that mean you realize how much of a blunder it is to bring up "what Bush should have known" in the face of "what Obama should have known"? Or are you just all about ad hominem?
With you my comments are anything but personal attacks in lieu of responding to you argument. In fact you never post and argument, all you do is whine and blame others while using pejoratives (like 'commie' 'socialist' or "magic negro". Keep in mind, IMO, you're a POS troll who has never posted anything of substance.
But does Jeb Bush believe in "feed the poor and they will breed", "let him die", "children work better hungry", and so on.This may seem obvious to all but diehard RW Republicans, but Jeb Bush could be the biggest threat to the Democratic Party since Abraham Lincoln. Hispanics are the fastest growing segment of our population, and a Spanish speaking President and Mexican-born First Lady would be an irresistible combination. Hispanic cultural values are much more closely aligned with the GOP, and it is only Democratic demagoguery about "immigration reform" which has countered this inclination.
Thus the attacks oh him from the Right and the Left. Strange bedfellows indeed!
ISIS is a product of Obama's success against AQ....
Utter nonsense.
ISIS is a product of Obama's success against AQ....
Utter nonsense.
Prove it!
But does Jeb Bush believe in "feed the poor and they will breed", "let him die", "children work better hungry", and so on.
It's because of these values that will make or break him. The GOP base will never forgive him if he doesn't embrace GOP values and policies.
Beside, wasn't Mitt Hispanic?
Jeb couldn't beat any Democrat including Hillary or Liz Warren
Conservatives are responsible for ISIS... Lol.. Obama's been president for 6 years. Libya is now a failed terrorist state. Obama supported the muslim brotherhood and even sanction arms sales to Egypt because the military overthrew them. Obama threatened Syria then changed his mind. Obama lifts some of the sanctions against Iran and gets nothing.... Yeah he's a fucking genius alrightArab Spring. Conservatives didn't want to help at all, because liberals wanted to. When it was their idea they were all for invading Iraq, but were against much smaller shows of force when a liberal suggested it. The results aren't all in yet, but Tunisia elected a moderate. Khadafi is gone and Egypt decided the Muslim Brotherhood wasn't their cup of tea. Syria might have been a win too, if the conservatives hadn't dragged their feet and allowed ISIS to take control. Nice going!!!You made the claim, back it up. The risk in pulling crap out of your ass and posting it is you may get called out on it. For you, that day has come. Back it up.
Really, GWB is now a conservative? I thought the RW had tossed W under the bus for his liberality and deficit spending. As I have written, anyone can make mistakes; invading & occupying Iraq, getting over 4,500 American's service personnel killed an tens of thousand seriously or permanently wounded all on borrowed money was one (or maybe half a dozen mistakes, but whose counting).
Neither GWB nor Obama had a road map to follow when they took office; sadly for Obama he had to put up with Boehner and McConnell two inept pols, both ambitious, partisan assholes who put their career first, the Plutocrats second and their party and base a distant third. The first of us? Not even an after thought.
Were did i say that? and poor Obama, he would have been the greatest president in American history if not for the Republican house...LOL
Maybe a manically hysterical woman who sees a "massive right-wing conspiracy" in every corner?This is what I'm saying. Plus Hillary has tons of baggage, from stand by your man to Benghazi and more. If this is as good as America can do, it's in worse shape than any of us thought.
The only people who care about Benghazi or where Bill put his dick aren't going to vote for any Democrat.
They've been throwing up roadblocks every step of the way and accusing Obama of the deaths in Libya when it's the Rep House that holds the purse strings. If they're going act that way, they're going to have to take the blame when something goes wrong. Reps like to think they're better a national defense, but lately it appears they've been reading their own clippings and resting on their laurels, when they're not criticizing Obama for things their grubby fingerprints are all over.Conservatives are responsible for ISIS... Lol.. Obama's been president for 6 years. Libya is now a failed terrorist state. Obama supported the muslim brotherhood and even sanction arms sales to Egypt because the military overthrew them. Obama threatened Syria then changed his mind. Obama lifts some of the sanctions against Iran and gets nothing.... Yeah he's a fucking genius alright
You're still in here trying to make a case for Hillary not running in 2016? What a goof.Maybe a manically hysterical woman who sees a "massive right-wing conspiracy" in every corner?This is what I'm saying. Plus Hillary has tons of baggage, from stand by your man to Benghazi and more. If this is as good as America can do, it's in worse shape than any of us thought.
The only people who care about Benghazi or where Bill put his dick aren't going to vote for any Democrat.
Hey Sarah G!You're still in here trying to make a case for Hillary not running in 2016? What a goof.Maybe a manically hysterical woman who sees a "massive right-wing conspiracy" in every corner?This is what I'm saying. Plus Hillary has tons of baggage, from stand by your man to Benghazi and more. If this is as good as America can do, it's in worse shape than any of us thought.
The only people who care about Benghazi or where Bill put his dick aren't going to vote for any Democrat.
That's true. The ones called RINOs are actually the classical conservatives that we learned about in history, NOT the conservatives we've seen since the advent of the Southern Strategy, the Moral Majority and Reaganism. They've perverted the political stance of historical conservatives so much that modern conservatives are hardly the same species.I guess it depends on how one defines conservative. Today's conservative have been tossed under the bus by the callous, neo, social and tea party conservative movement - real conservatives are today known as RINO's.
Hispanics are doing the voting, so they're ones you're calling stupid. No wonder conservatives can't their vote!Highspanics are mainly catholic who are opposed to abortion but they vote for the party that promotes abortion. Typical democrat dichotomy and stupidity.
