Jeb Bush Won't Talk About Wars His Brother Started

[paulitician]

Don't worry Sheeple, it's already been determined. You'll be getting another NWO Globalist Elite President. The Clinton's and Bush's are Royal Families in the NWO. So just sit back and relax, there will be many more Wars coming. They're in the works as we speak. Clinton and Bush will carry on with Permanent War. Bet on that.

Which is why I'm so against Jeb Bush that I'll break ranks and vote for the Libertarian candidate again like I did in 2008 if he becomes the nominee. I'm tired of the interminable wars which are made even longer because we don't actually do anything to permanently cripple the enemy. We're playing Wack A Mole when we should be playing Nuke A Mole.

Yeah, both are NWO Global Elite Royals. They will certainly continue on with the Elite Permanent War agenda.

Said all I could possibly say at this point, America wants another war - despite what happened in Iraq. When it turns badly, and thousands come home in body bags (whether from the Middle East or Ukraine) - only then will they stop calling everyone against the war 'traitors'.

But, then again the war lobby just waits till memories fade and starts a war all over again.

We live in terrible times, on one hand atrocities and attempted genocide by ISIS and other Islamic groups, and on the other end blood letting and chaos in Ukraine. But a full scale confrontation won't generate a favorable outcome, any more than past attempts - ISIS is not a small country like Serbia, and Russia is no pushover.

Permanent War remakes the world in the Globalist Elite image. Order comes out of chaos.... The New World Order.

 

[Vigilante]

TEA Party Set to Pour 10+ Years' Pent-Up Frustration Into Pulverizing Jeb Bush, Nominating Cruz

Reaganite Republican ^
Friends don't let friends vote RINO... I don't give a damn how much moolah Jeb Bush is currently shaking out of people with more money than sense... it's impossible to picture this charmless Gee-Oh-Pee establishment tool in the White House: not only does the Republican base despise him, but no Bush is going to beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. I actually consider her a more flawed candidate than most do, but you can't run a clown who's practically family with the Clintons and expect him to take the requisite fight to Shrillary by discussing her serial scandals/failure. And the Clinton...

 

[Lakhota]

TEA Party Set to Pour 10+ Years' Pent-Up Frustration Into Pulverizing Jeb Bush, Nominating Cruz

Reaganite Republican ^
Friends don't let friends vote RINO... I don't give a damn how much moolah Jeb Bush is currently shaking out of people with more money than sense... it's impossible to picture this charmless Gee-Oh-Pee establishment tool in the White House: not only does the Republican base despise him, but no Bush is going to beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. I actually consider her a more flawed candidate than most do, but you can't run a clown who's practically family with the Clintons and expect him to take the requisite fight to Shrillary by discussing her serial scandals/failure. And the Clinton...

I look forward to the internal NaziCon wars! Bring it on...

 

[HUGGY]

You dumbass! Carter had a terrible presidency and he helps his party all the time. How stupid can you be?

In what way?

The economy, the disasterous foreign policy, the gas rationing, where should we start. If you're going to characterize Carter's presidency as successful, you win the biggest ass of the day award.

Still rated better than the Bush presidency by a big margin, so if Carter was a disaster, what do you think that makes Bush? Have to say a total catastrophe.

You're too young. You don't remember the Carter days like those of us who lived through it. You didn't see the hopelessness and despair, high unemployment and trucks stuck unable to transport goods because there was no fuel. Carter caused the Reagan landslide win.

Fuck you. There was no "hopelessness and despair", you little drama queen.

• Gas was expensive, due to OPEC, not Carter.
• We had high inflation, inherited from Republicans Nixon and Ford, not Carter. Remember Ford's "WIN" buttons? "Whip Inflation Now".
• We had an embassy of 250 people taken hostage. Also not Carter's fault.
• We had a botched military rescue, which was the military's fault, not Carter's.

Carter was a political outsider and got NO co-operation from the political insiders, mostly th republicans, similar to what they have done to Obama. The only difference with Carter was that they didn't announce their intentions so publicly as they did with the Mulatto.

I didn't like Carter because I was a republican at the time but mostly because he was a born again Christian. Those people are fruitcakes.
If someone's self worth and sense of having a future is based on who is the sitting president that person is weak and confused. They would be weak and confused no matter who the president is.

 

[Lakhota]

Meet the new Bush - same as the old Bush. Just another warmonger.

Jeb Bush's Foreign Policy Plan: More Military Spending Will Encourage Peace

 

[hipeter924]

Meet the new Bush - same as the old Bush. Just another warmonger.

Jeb Bush's Foreign Policy Plan: More Military Spending Will Encourage Peace

Lol. Increased military spending never encourages peace, only arms races and eventual war. China and Russia increase their spending in response to America, building more ships, tanks, aircraft,etc. Only groups who profit are the weapons companies funding Jeb's campaign. Whereas we get war and body bags.

 

[billyerock1991]

REPUBLICANS WON'T TALK ABOUT THEIR FUCK UPS THAT WOULD PUT THEM IN A BAD LIGHT... AND HOW DO YOU SAY WELL MY BROTHER HAS ALWASY BEEN A FUCK UP WITH OUT CREATING FAMILY EMPLOSION

You are denying Clinton signed the Iraq liberation act for wmds and the democrats promulgated the existence of wmds before booooooosh took office and the very democrats you proudly support now voted for the war?

If you are right about being on the wrong side of every single issue, then you are truly right.

As it turns out we have been 100% correct about every single issue. From man made global warming being a fucking lie, to obamacare being a fucking lie and a disaster, to every other issue we can think of.

Left wingers are nothing but water carrying tool bags for their democrat Marxist/socialist democrat dumbocrats. You are nothing but a bandwagon pile of arrogant, ignorant shit. Not to mention a patronizing racist.

Fuck every left wing lying scumbag.

why do you keep proving to us that you're a idiot??? we all knew under Clinton they had wmds ... not one american question it ... the problem you republicans have is you're a bunch of fucking liars... with the UN and their inspector, Clinton had them all the wmd's removed ... then under Clinton, he had them all distroyed .... under Bush he had to lie to us to go to war over oil not Wmd's ...he had to use information that was a lie to get the american people to buy his fuck ups to go to war by his lying ... when you have something about clintion that is factul I let ya know ... after all, dumb fuck ,you never were too bright....

You are the miserable fucking liar. Being wrong is not the same thing as lying you unreal useless piece of socialist shit. You have no fucking what you are talking about.

You are nothing but a fucking ball of socialist Obama Marxist cliches.

You fucking double talking piece of shit hypocritical douche bag.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaah poor little upset repub-lie-tard !!! can't stand the truth... clinton took saddams wmd's away from him ... where bush had to make them up then lie to the people about them ...where you can't stand the fact that you lie and you support the republican liars in office...

hey repub-lie-tards

 

[Antares]

""We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002"

We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002"

There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002"

We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

 

[Antares]

""In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

 

[Siete]

speaking of missiles ... where were they, hiding with the WMD's ?

LMAO

 

[hipeter924]

""We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002"

We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002"

There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002"

We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Yep. Dems can be war mongers too: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

Yeas (296)
Republican 215
Democratic 81
Nays (133)
Republican 6
Democratic 126
Independent 1
NV (3)
Republican 2
Democratic 1

 

[Kondor3]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

 

[Lakhota]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

Betray? Why isn't Jeb defending his brother's wars - rather than refusing to talk about them?

 

[Lakhota]

Here are the main topics that I hope Jeb is repeatedly grilled on:

1. His brother's wars.

2. His father's war (suckering Saddam into Kuwait).

3. Terri Schiavo.

4. His role in the 2000 Florida presidential election.

 

[Kondor3]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

Betray? Why isn't Jeb defending his brother's wars - rather than refusing to talk about them?

Anything he says - pro or con - will be misconstrued by Faction A or B - and it's all years in the past, and nothing to do with him.

I can't blame the guy for wanting to keep that old shit off his own personal scope.

In this country, we do not hold a man or woman responsible for the doings of his or her father or mother - or sibling, for that matter.

Or, at least, that was my understanding of the way things are supposed to work here.

 

[Lakhota]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

Betray? Why isn't Jeb defending his brother's wars - rather than refusing to talk about them?

Anything he says - pro or con - will be misconstrued by Faction A or B - and it's all years in the past, and nothing to do with him.

I can't blame the guy for wanting to keep that old shit off his own personal scope.

In this country, we do not hold a man or woman responsible for the doings of his or her father or mother - or sibling, for that matter.

Or, at least, that was my understanding of the way things are supposed to work here.

Based on your logic - would you vote for Charles Manson's or Adolf Hitler's brother or son?

 

[Kondor3]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

Betray? Why isn't Jeb defending his brother's wars - rather than refusing to talk about them?

Anything he says - pro or con - will be misconstrued by Faction A or B - and it's all years in the past, and nothing to do with him.

I can't blame the guy for wanting to keep that old shit off his own personal scope.

In this country, we do not hold a man or woman responsible for the doings of his or her father or mother - or sibling, for that matter.

Or, at least, that was my understanding of the way things are supposed to work here.

Based on your logic - would you vote for Charles Manson's or Adolf Hitler's brother or son?

Are you equating George W. Bush with either Charles Manson or Adolf Hitler?

 

[hadit]

Here are the main topics that I hope Jeb is repeatedly grilled on:

1. His brother's wars.

2. His father's war (suckering Saddam into Kuwait).

3. Terri Schiavo.

4. His role in the 2000 Florida presidential election.

50% of which have nothing to do with him. I know the left is at the bottom of the scandal barrel, but that's pathetic.

 

[HUGGY]

Jeb Bush won't talk about wars his brother started?

Well, yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

Would you betray your own brother to the howling mob?

Betray? Why isn't Jeb defending his brother's wars - rather than refusing to talk about them?

Anything he says - pro or con - will be misconstrued by Faction A or B - and it's all years in the past, and nothing to do with him.

I can't blame the guy for wanting to keep that old shit off his own personal scope.

In this country, we do not hold a man or woman responsible for the doings of his or her father or mother - or sibling, for that matter.

Or, at least, that was my understanding of the way things are supposed to work here.

Based on your logic - would you vote for Charles Manson's or Adolf Hitler's brother or son?

Are you equating George W. Bush with either Charles Manson or Adolf Hitler?

Can't do that. Manson and Hitler were both better communicators.

 

[HUGGY]

Here are the main topics that I hope Jeb is repeatedly grilled on:

1. His brother's wars.

2. His father's war (suckering Saddam into Kuwait).

3. Terri Schiavo.

4. His role in the 2000 Florida presidential election.

50% of which have nothing to do with him. I know the left is at the bottom of the scandal barrel, but that's pathetic.

You think sending thousands of Americans to the other side of the world to die over oil we never saw is a scandal?

Elliot Abrams: "The oil we get will pay for it" By "we" Abrams must have been referring to his international oil buddies.