That was my point. Forest management isn't bad, because there never was a management plan in the urban interface to start with. There never was a plan, because there truly isn't a viable plan with this type of ecosystem. These hills are covered in heavy fire sensitive brush and grasses, that are supposed to be there. Money, through development, took precedence, ignoring the fire science of the area. That is what really happened. And Jerry Brown is taking the fall for something he had nothing to do with.How is the forest management bad? Hasn't it always been the same in California? If it is such an asinine statement, you should have no problem answering my question right?What a completely asinine statement. If Global Warming causes catastrophic fires why aren't there similar fires all over the globe? All Brown is doing is deflecting the blame for the real cause, which is a cyclical, and typical CA drought and bad forest management by California and the Federal Government. Frankly, I also disagree with Trump's statement because a lot of the blame lies on U.S. Forestry's 'let it burn' policy. Sierra Pacific put out a statement contradicting Trump however, they are a private enterprise and do take good care of their own timber land. We are being fed political lies instead of real solutions by BOTH parties.
I explained it already in several posts try to follow along. Letting fuel loads pile up is bad forest management and no it has not always been the same in CA the forests started burning and dying due to bad conservation policies put in place in over 30 years of bad decisions.
Getting rid of fuel loads in urban interface areas, is an unbelievably difficult, if not impossible undertaking There are too many limiting factors that make that task an almost a never ending process. And without the cooperation from every household in the hills, with money, it only takes a few people letting that fuel load pile up to create a potential catastrophe. There is also the problem with erosion and mud slides due to too much clearing. These areas are too sensitive for development. That is the reality.
Bottom line, these developed areas should have never been developed to begin with. And again, Brown had nothing to do with that. Money did.