basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,042
- 2,220
- Banned
- #241
That’s not John Lewis. That’s Elijah Cummings. Wrong Black man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you prove spit?And it was up to Lewis to prove his accusations, which he was never able to do. Lewis made an accusation, that he was assualted and battered. He could not prove that, in the age of cell phones?[QUOTE="elektra, post: 25
It was the opinion of Conservatives that Lewis lied
never proven
Cool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
Let's see now, it seems that Biden doesn't give a rats ace about what's going on as he hides in his bunker, so by giving Biden his endorsement, he basically endorsed violence through the candidate that hides in his basement saying nothing to try and stop it“We must use the vote as a nonviolent instrument or tool to redeem the soul of America.” - John Lewis, upon endorsing Biden
Really???I could never understand why he sold out.. how can you get your ass kicked by democrats than join them in a scheme to control black people.. I hope he rots in hell.
John Lewis due to his bad experiences in life, unfortunately was left with a bias and probably a racial hatred and suspicion of white's that he could never overcome. His record sadly showed this over time, but of course it is understandable. Maxine Waters and others are sadly in the same boat, so they are for harassing white's who don't tow the line, and this no matter where they are or what they are doing. Harass them until the end of time if you have to, just do it is their mantra.John Lewis was NEITHER a typical man nor a typical Democratic politician. He was a man of uncommon valor and principle, as was proven not just in his youth, but over his long political life by his total unwillingness to take “legal” bribes to enrich himself.Typical Democrat.
You, sir, are also not a “typical” man. Perhaps not a typical Republican, either. Your comments indicate you are an uncommonly unsympathetic ... lowlife.
Cool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
Yes they are. A new version ofCool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
The point is, they are not Jim Crow laws. They may be bad policy or bad laws. But they are not Jim Crow laws. Unless you can show me any law, supported by John Lewis, that forced racial segregation, you have lost this argument. This claim that they are "new Jim Crow laws" is bullshit. Jim Crow laws are forced segregation. Period.
Yes they are. A new version ofCool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
The point is, they are not Jim Crow laws. They may be bad policy or bad laws. But they are not Jim Crow laws. Unless you can show me any law, supported by John Lewis, that forced racial segregation, you have lost this argument. This claim that they are "new Jim Crow laws" is bullshit. Jim Crow laws are forced segregation. Period.
Destruction. I’m not asking a left-wing Democrat socialist communist if he agrees with me I could care less I’m telling you that what he did to the black community was far worse than the original Jim Crow laws
America just got better.
I actually did you can’t read.. you don’t acknowledge one big government destroys people. Because you are for big government you’re for a big huge massive oversightYes they are. A new version ofCool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
The point is, they are not Jim Crow laws. They may be bad policy or bad laws. But they are not Jim Crow laws. Unless you can show me any law, supported by John Lewis, that forced racial segregation, you have lost this argument. This claim that they are "new Jim Crow laws" is bullshit. Jim Crow laws are forced segregation. Period.
Destruction. I’m not asking a left-wing Democrat socialist communist if he agrees with me I could care less I’m telling you that what he did to the black community was far worse than the original Jim Crow laws
If you had said what he did was worse than the Jim Crow laws, I would have left it alone.
But that is not what you said. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And then I had to educate you on what Jim Crow laws actually were. There are no "new Jim Crow laws" unless there are new laws that force racial segregation. And there aren't.
John Lewis risked his life to fight Jim CrowCool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
The point is, they are not Jim Crow laws. They may be bad policy or bad laws. But they are not Jim Crow laws. Unless you can show me any law, supported by John Lewis, that forced racial segregation, you have lost this argument. This claim that they are "new Jim Crow laws" is bullshit. Jim Crow laws are forced segregation. Period.
Quit using black folks, they might tire of you before long.![]()
"you may be the first to do many things, make sure you're not the last" - MLK to John Lewis
And than he help implement the new Jim Crow laws. Just districts are massive shit holesJohn Lewis risked his life to fight Jim CrowCool story, any body with eyes of his districts could see they weren’t diverse beautiful neighborhoods in which his policies bore fruit of success. Just oppression caused by new Jim Crow laws.. you want to ignore what this scum bag did.What he did was far worse than any Jim Crow law.. the new ones are far more DestructiveI already addressed what the news jim crow laws are.. he was a sick ManDid you see his fucking district,The new ones yes he didI explained to you.. again read what I wrote or have a monkey read it for you lolAgain I already went over how Jim Crow laws were continued in other waysI already went over this.. please re read.. or have a 2 year old read it for you Capeesh?I’ve already addressed this.. If you can’t understand have somebody read it for youYea they Adapted to the law.. are you unaware of LBJ? Welfare? Break down of the family, who controls education? Just because they don’t come out and say hey these new laws are meant to destroy the Black people. Doesn’t mean they don’t existTodays Jim Crow laws are a lot worse today.. he lives in a district with blacks were living in rat infestation.. he is a disgusting human being we have more segregation today than we did back then.. Like I said I hope he rots in hellUmm he was a democratHe backed him crow years laterHe was a good puppet for you guysJohn Lewis was a great American Patriot
Risked his life and freedom fighting for Liberty and Justice
Lunch counter sit in’s
Freedom Rider
Led the March in Selma
Spoke before Martin Luther Kings.......I have a dream
He will be missed
Yeah, how dare we praise a black man who put his own safety and life in danger to fight against Jim Crow laws and for blacks to be able to register to vote.
He did? Please provide a link showing John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws.
Let me help educate you. Jim Crow laws were specifically laws that required racial segregation. You know, segregated schools, public transportation, segregated bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters. Unless you have some instance in which he supported racial segregation, just admit you were wrong and be done with it. This idea that any democrat supports every single facet of the entire history of the democratic party is ridiculous.
So you obviously don't understand the definition of Jim Crow laws. Not much else to discuss.
You claimed that John Lewis backed Jim Crow laws. Either you didn't mean "Jim Crow laws" when you said he backed Jim Crow laws, or you don't understand what Jim Crow laws were.
Jim Crow laws were not about destroying black people. They were about segregation.
Unless you have some segregation law that he backed, you have failed.
No, you have not. First you said he supported Jim Crow laws. Then, when you were corrected, you tried to backtrack and talk about things that are not Jim Crow laws.
At least you learned the definition of Jim Crow laws today. That is a plus. Glad I could help out.
No. You claimed he supported Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws are about segregation. That is it. So rather than talk about bad areas of Atlanta, tell me what forced segregation laws John Lewis supported.
from: Jim Crow law | History, Facts, & Examples
" Jim Crow law, in U.S. history, any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s."
from: Jim Crow Laws
" Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation."
from: Jim Crow Laws | American Experience | PBS
" The segregation and disenfranchisement laws known as "Jim Crow" represented a formal, codified system of racial apartheid that dominated the American South for three quarters of a century beginning in the 1890s. The laws affected almost every aspect of daily life, mandating segregation of schools, parks, libraries, drinking fountains, restrooms, buses, trains, and restaurants. "Whites Only" and "Colored" signs were constant reminders of the enforced racial order."
No, you did not. You did not provide one single example of him supported laws that forced segregation. And forced segregation is what Jim Crow laws were all about.
No need. It is NOT supporting Jim Crow laws. Period.
Were they laws forcing legal segregation?
It was a rat infested shit hole, parts of his district was just one color.
Not relevant to the question I asked. Were they laws forcing legal segregation? Yes or No?
New Jim Crow laws? You mean laws that don't call for forced segregation that only you are calling the "new Jim Crow laws"?
Bullshit. You said he supported Jim Crow laws. And now you won't even answer a simple question of whether or not the laws he supported involved forced legal segregation. You are dishonest and a coward.
YOu are welcome to your opinion that they are worse than any Jim Crow law. But thanks for admitting that they were not, in fact Jim Crow laws.
The point is, they are not Jim Crow laws. They may be bad policy or bad laws. But they are not Jim Crow laws. Unless you can show me any law, supported by John Lewis, that forced racial segregation, you have lost this argument. This claim that they are "new Jim Crow laws" is bullshit. Jim Crow laws are forced segregation. Period.
Restrictions on voting, segregated buses, segregated eating areas