basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,042
- 2,220
- Banned
- #281
“Well done, good and faithful servant.” Matthew 25:23
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s the problem?They did it again. Yet another Republican Senator posted a picture with Elijah Cummings, saying it was John Lewis. This time it was Alaska's Dan Sullivan. It’s disgusting. It gives you a real glimpse into what they honestly think of our heroes.
![]()
I’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
What’s the problem?They did it again. Yet another Republican Senator posted a picture with Elijah Cummings, saying it was John Lewis. This time it was Alaska's Dan Sullivan. It’s disgusting. It gives you a real glimpse into what they honestly think of our heroes.
![]()
Marco Rubio did it tooWhat’s the problem?They did it again. Yet another Republican Senator posted a picture with Elijah Cummings, saying it was John Lewis. This time it was Alaska's Dan Sullivan. It’s disgusting. It gives you a real glimpse into what they honestly think of our heroes.
![]()
Talking about him like he knew him, and then posting a pic of someone else? That is pretty sad.
I’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
Marco Rubio did it tooWhat’s the problem?They did it again. Yet another Republican Senator posted a picture with Elijah Cummings, saying it was John Lewis. This time it was Alaska's Dan Sullivan. It’s disgusting. It gives you a real glimpse into what they honestly think of our heroes.
![]()
Talking about him like he knew him, and then posting a pic of someone else? That is pretty sad.
Cool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Cool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Are you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
They both look like raisins who cares
Are you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
Awesome..l suggest all nutless pussies put me on ignore.America just got better.
You really are an ASSHOLE.
TIME TO PUT THIS ASSHOLE ON IGNORE!
No they created policy within the laws to keep people out.. they are definitely divided by race.. Pretending that these neighborhoods are unsegregated because they don’t say Jim Crow law.. then you are just as racist as the DemocratsWhere in the 1960sAre you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
Are you saying that white people are not legally allowed to move into these black neighborhoods? Because THAT is the point. They call them Jim Crow LAWS for a reason.
If these neighborhoods were black because of Jim Crow Laws, then when a white girl moves in with her boyfriend, she would be arrested.
No they created policy within the laws to keep people out.. they are definitely divided by race.. Pretending that these neighborhoods are unsegregated because they don’t say Jim Crow law.. then you are just as racist as the DemocratsWhere in the 1960sAre you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
Are you saying that white people are not legally allowed to move into these black neighborhoods? Because THAT is the point. They call them Jim Crow LAWS for a reason.
If these neighborhoods were black because of Jim Crow Laws, then when a white girl moves in with her boyfriend, she would be arrested.
Your so slowNo they created policy within the laws to keep people out.. they are definitely divided by race.. Pretending that these neighborhoods are unsegregated because they don’t say Jim Crow law.. then you are just as racist as the DemocratsWhere in the 1960sAre you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
Are you saying that white people are not legally allowed to move into these black neighborhoods? Because THAT is the point. They call them Jim Crow LAWS for a reason.
If these neighborhoods were black because of Jim Crow Laws, then when a white girl moves in with her boyfriend, she would be arrested.
Yet again, you try to makeup what I said. I would think you would know I would see it and point it out. But you are pretty hard headed.
I have not pretended that the neighborhoods are not segregated. I am simply saying that there are no Jim Crow laws that force them to be segregated. If a white person bought a house in that neighborhood, they could move in and live there. Under Jim Crow laws, they could not.
Your so slowNo they created policy within the laws to keep people out.. they are definitely divided by race.. Pretending that these neighborhoods are unsegregated because they don’t say Jim Crow law.. then you are just as racist as the DemocratsWhere in the 1960sAre you saying that there are white people that are moving into these black neighborhoods!? LolCool storyI’ve already addressed why they are new aged Jim Crow lawsWhen blacks were doing better pre 1964 than in 2020.. and you don’t do anything, and ignore it. You are worse than any kkk member
Who said I don't do anything and that I ignore it. I have not said anything pro or con about it.
All I have said is that if it is not forced racial segregation, it is not a Jim Crow laws. And you keep arguing.
I don't really give a rat's ass why you think they are the "new aged Jim Crow laws". They are not Jim Crow laws unless they are about forced racial segregation. I gave you the definitions from 3 sources. They all said the same thing. Jim Crow laws were racial segregation laws.
You want to redefine what a Jim Crow law is, but that doesn't work. Now you are just arguing to safe face and not admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Not a story. Facts. Jim Crow laws are about racial segregation. That is it. You want to make it about other things because you got caught running your mouth about things you don't know. Next time sit down and let the grownups talk. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws.
Are you saying that white people are not legally allowed to move into these black neighborhoods? Because THAT is the point. They call them Jim Crow LAWS for a reason.
If these neighborhoods were black because of Jim Crow Laws, then when a white girl moves in with her boyfriend, she would be arrested.
Yet again, you try to makeup what I said. I would think you would know I would see it and point it out. But you are pretty hard headed.
I have not pretended that the neighborhoods are not segregated. I am simply saying that there are no Jim Crow laws that force them to be segregated. If a white person bought a house in that neighborhood, they could move in and live there. Under Jim Crow laws, they could not.