Joint Military Exercises of Ukrainian and American Paratroopers in Western Ukraine

Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.


Yet, Pootie is laughing at the world's #1 Superpower that CANNOT even protect its own border!

Democrates do not care...
images


images

100211163617_nuclear_blast_226.jpg


Before...

images


And after...
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.


Yet, Pootie is laughing at the world's #1 Superpower that CANNOT even protect its own border!

The danger for ordinary Americans is the tactics of using nuclear weapons: Russia in the event of a conflict under certain conditions will strike the Yellowstone supervolcano and San Andreas tectonic fracture. In this case, the eruption of supervolcano and catastrophic earthquakes in the United States will happen which means destruction of the country's population

images

You are an idiot of unequaled caliber!
 
Joint military exercises of Ukrainian and American paratroopers began in Western Ukraine, by the city of Lviv, which Poland claims.

The armed conflict between Russia and the United States, if it occurs, will begin more likely not in Syria, but in Ukraine, says honorary professor at Columbia University (New York) Robert Legvold on the fields of the conference of the Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe.

"And this will be caused not by the U.S. worries that Russia can take away the territory from Estonia,”said athe expert .

Our remark: is it possible in the face of what is happening to condemn Russia for an attempt to create a "security belt" by supporting the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, who rebelled against the Nazi policies of Kiev?

ea779a1882c00bc1f3d26442048141e9.jpg

Let's forget that the US Army has been these exercises for years!
 
In summary, the use of nuclear weapons would lead to unintended consequences that could end civilization. From nuclear winter, to radioactive fallout, to depopulation, to any number of unintended disasters. This is why the current posture of containment, of protecting current borders, of using economic sanctions is the preferred method of opposition. People want prosperity, not nuclear war.
 
Russia is never going to give up Ukraine. It's one of the few seaports they have available.

In this case, logistics is a minor factor. The main one is geopolitica onel. At the moment, the flying time of NATO missiles to Moscow is 9-12 minutes. If Ukraine joins NATO - American missiles, installed in the Donbass, will reach Moscow in ... 4 minutes.

If a hypersonic weapon is used, we are generally talking about seconds. All this is very dangerous, since Russia was forced to change its nuclear doctrine and it could apply nuclear weapons IF a conventional war would not be in its favor.

But Russians cannot be conquered - in case of occupation, people forget about their offenses against the government and rise up to fight.

In the Patriotic War of 1812, serfs rose to fight the army of Napoleon. The result is known ...

The fate of NATO troops will be terrible ... It will be worse than Vietnam...
images


1*_AxmUUUFl-CgcYNBMjjOAA.jpeg

NATO has no interest in invading Russian territory. The Challenge for NATO is to defend its Eastern European countries now that Russia has returned to its normal aggressive and expansionist past. NATO has made some moves to try and defend the Baltic States, but so far, what has been put in place is inadequate to succeed at that task. But it does show that NATO is willing to bleed for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
 
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.

If Putin uses nukes against US forces what happens next? Same for the Brits. Same for the French. I tend to disagree with your sequence of events.

After what Hitler did, Russia will never ever leave that flank exposed again if NATO decides to get too squirrelly.

The fear of mutual annihilation was the ONLY factor that prevented a nuclear conflict in the past. But the illiterate Pentagon WAR MONGERS, it seems, believe that you can attack another country and go unpunished.

the main thing is that soldiers from ordinary, poor American families will die as it happened in the past and has been hapenning now in Iraq, Afganistan and Syria.

War mongers have already dug spider holes and believe that they can "sit out"...

images


It was not just mutual annihilation, its also the fact that wars of conquest are about stealing a relatively intact prize, not a nuclear burned out wasteland.

The United States does not launched unprovoked attacks on other countries. That's what Saddam's Iraq did, Hitler's Germany, and now unfortunately Putin's Russia.

Only 6 U.S. soldiers have been killed in combat in Iraq in the last 7.5 years. The last U.S. soldier to die in combat in Iraq was nearly two years ago. Only a small number of U.S. troops have been killed in Syria. Russia has lost far more troops in Syria than the United States. In Afghanistan, U.S. troop losses per year are now only tiny fraction of what they once were at the start of the decade.

By the way, the United States has an all volunteer army. The vast majority of its troops come from middle class families. All officers in the United States military have a 4 year college degree. Many enlisted personal also have college degrees. The United States military has one of the best educated fighting forces in the world.
 
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.


Yet, Pootie is laughing at the world's #1 Superpower that CANNOT even protect its own border!

Democrates do not care...
images


images

100211163617_nuclear_blast_226.jpg


Before...

images


And after...
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.


Yet, Pootie is laughing at the world's #1 Superpower that CANNOT even protect its own border!

The danger for ordinary Americans is the tactics of using nuclear weapons: Russia in the event of a conflict under certain conditions will strike the Yellowstone supervolcano and San Andreas tectonic fracture. In this case, the eruption of supervolcano and catastrophic earthquakes in the United States will happen which means destruction of the country's population

images


The Russians would not waste nuclear weapons on the theory of causing the eruption of a volcano. Russian nuclear weapons would be directed at U.S. military sites and bases of which there are hundreds throughtout the country. The destruction caused by that would be more than enough to kill 90% of the population within a year. But that has been a fact of life since the late 1960s.
 
In summary, the use of nuclear weapons would lead to unintended consequences that could end civilization. From nuclear winter, to radioactive fallout, to depopulation, to any number of unintended disasters. This is why the current posture of containment, of protecting current borders, of using economic sanctions is the preferred method of opposition. People want prosperity, not nuclear war.

Although this is true, the risk that a nuclear war could happen is not zero. Mis-calculation, mis-communication, accidents and other things still make it a possibility even if it is a remote one.
 
After what Hitler did, Russia will never ever leave that flank exposed again if NATO decides to get too squirrelly.

Not aimed at you, but that is a total Russian BULLSHIT excuse.

Hitler and Stalin were ALLIES when Hitler invaded.


Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact - Wikipedia

The gasoline in the German Panzers rolling over France was Russian gasoline.

Russia invaded Poland 2-1/2 short weeks after Germany did.

Many of the atrocities committed in Poland were done by Soviets.

People just don't have a clear understanding of history in this Country.

In fact, the biggest lie of the 20th Century was convincing people that Hitler wasn't a socialist. He was. Totally.

And he was Stalin's Ally for the first two years of the War.

Barely a word was said against Hitler while he was Stalin's butt-buddy. After he invaded Russia, our resident commies took notice.

Before that? They just weren't interested.
 
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.


Yet, Pootie is laughing at the world's #1 Superpower that CANNOT even protect its own border!

because for some stupid ass reason we do not let our military defend the border.

This "stupid a.. reason" is called a democratic liberal reason.
It is impossible to believe: in the country that still calls itself a "world leader", the question whether to HAVE or NOT TO HAVE a protected border is discussed! In the XXI-st century! After all these talks about terrorism...

Are the FBI and other 10 special serviceses AFRAID to remain without work and be dismissed ???

fec93842372ecaa4c6aa38540b120207.jpg
 
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.
But they won't because they would be killing their entire country the minute they launch.
Most Americans don't know the workings of eastern Europe. If NATO wants to really piss Putin off they should let Ukraine in.
Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) - Wikipedia
So Russia keeps Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and NATO gets the rest of Ukraine? Then Russia captures Ukrainian ships?! Then Germany buys Russian gas?! Most Americans want to keep out of that mess, but we all know that Putin is no match for NATO, even Putin knows that.


800px-2014_Russo-ukrainian-conflict_map.svg.png

Actually Russia could take NATO conventional forces out in 4 days using their mobile limited nukes if they had to.

If Putin uses nukes against US forces what happens next? Same for the Brits. Same for the French. I tend to disagree with your sequence of events.

After what Hitler did, Russia will never ever leave that flank exposed again if NATO decides to get too squirrelly.

The fear of mutual annihilation was the ONLY factor that prevented a nuclear conflict in the past. But the illiterate Pentagon WAR MONGERS, it seems, believe that you can attack another country and go unpunished.

the main thing is that soldiers from ordinary, poor American families will die as it happened in the past and has been hapenning now in Iraq, Afganistan and Syria.

War mongers have already dug spider holes and believe that they can "sit out"...

images


It was not just mutual annihilation, its also the fact that wars of conquest are about stealing a relatively intact prize, not a nuclear burned out wasteland.

The United States does not launched unprovoked attacks on other countries. That's what Saddam's Iraq did, Hitler's Germany, and now unfortunately Putin's Russia.

Only 6 U.S. soldiers have been killed in combat in Iraq in the last 7.5 years. The last U.S. soldier to die in combat in Iraq was nearly two years ago. Only a small number of U.S. troops have been killed in Syria. Russia has lost far more troops in Syria than the United States. In Afghanistan, U.S. troop losses per year are now only tiny fraction of what they once were at the start of the decade.

By the way, the United States has an all volunteer army. The vast majority of its troops come from middle class families. All officers in the United States military have a 4 year college degree. Many enlisted personal also have college degrees. The United States military has one of the best educated fighting forces in the world.

While your post is very accurate, you did slip up on this one point. All US military officers DO NOT have a 4 year college degree.
 

Forum List

Back
Top