Judge denies Cohen's request to review records retained in search

[IsaacNewton]

Judge won't let Trump attorney Cohen review seized files before the feds, as Stormy Daniels speaks out

A major setback for team trump...

They are Cohen's files, wouldn't he know generally what was there. Me thinks orange turd talked to him and said they needed to know what was coming. The judge on the other hand said GFY.

Now Sean Hannity is involved in this mess. There is this swirling cesspool of corrupt people and make no mistake they are gleefully corrupt, all of whom have their heads all the way up Lying Donald's ass.

Drain the swamp? All they've done is transposed a much more primordial smellier more dangerous swamp over the previous one. I ask again, conservatives how did you slide all the way down the slope to this? You are tromping through muck up to your arm pits that smells like an open sewer in Bangladesh.

 

[mudwhistle]

Judge won't let Trump attorney Cohen review seized files before the feds, as Stormy Daniels speaks out

A major setback for team trump...

Guess what
That judge officiated at George Soros wedding.
Weird, huh?



https://pagesix.com/2013/09/20/political-bigs-expected-at-george-soros-wedding/

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Now, Cohen gets paid to say dumb shit like this. What's your excuse?

Let me know when they find anything and what it is.....

Will do! I have a strange feeling I won't be able to find you....

 

[Rambunctious]

Will do! I have a strange feeling I won't be able to find you....

I'm always right here....me and my smiling face....

 

[JimH52]

Now, Cohen gets paid to say dumb shit like this. What's your excuse?

Let me know when they find anything and what it is.....

Oh, you will know. The Cohen stash is going to be Epic.

 

[Rambunctious]

Oh, you will know. The Cohen stash is going to be Epic.

When I heard today this was all approved by extremely partisan judges I knew the dems were headed towards another nothing burger...

 

[JimH52]

The important thing is the prosecutors can proceed....SLAM!

Nothing to hide....let them dig all they want...

Right...that is why trump and Cohen are losing their minds and filing court proceedings trying to stop the Feds.

 

[depotoo]

In spite of protections provided in the fourth amendment, law enforcement officers (noted in actual wording as “government officials”) are reserved the right to conduct searches under the grounds of probable cause. Today, in essence, this requires law enforcement officers to present their probable cause reasons to a member of the judicial department, which will issue a warrant to search the property. However, search warrants are not a carte blanche invitation to invade privacy, but rather a legally executed search warrant must include:

• Specific reasons of probable cause
• Supported by sworn oaths or affidavits of the officials stating the probable cause
• Includes a specific place, individual, and items being searched

A major setback for team trump...

Prosecutors will find some juice stuff in this pile of material. trump and Cohen are sweating tonight...

If the warrant doesn’t cover it, they won’t.

You do not know the law.

 

[Rambunctious]

Right...that is why trump and Cohen are losing their minds and filing court proceedings trying to stop the Feds

Of course they are the search was unconstitutional....just wait....you will see...nothing burger....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Will do! I have a strange feeling I won't be able to find you....

I'm always right here....me and my smiling face....

Of course they are the search was unconstitutional.

Of course, it was not, by the very definitions of what is constitutional and what is not.

Dude...fire your team of legal researchers. They are literally ALWAYS wrong.

 

[JimH52]

In spite of protections provided in the fourth amendment, law enforcement officers (noted in actual wording as “government officials”) are reserved the right to conduct searches under the grounds of probable cause. Today, in essence, this requires law enforcement officers to present their probable cause reasons to a member of the judicial department, which will issue a warrant to search the property. However, search warrants are not a carte blanche invitation to invade privacy, but rather a legally executed search warrant must include:

• Specific reasons of probable cause
• Supported by sworn oaths or affidavits of the officials stating the probable cause
• Includes a specific place, individual, and items being searched

A major setback for team trump...

Prosecutors will find some juice stuff in this pile of material. trump and Cohen are sweating tonight...

If the warrant doesn’t cover it, they won’t.

You do not know the law.

Yup, this is what the prosecutors did. They followed the rule of law. You know they checked and double checked before they took a move. It was obvious that Cohen and trump were going to challenge them.

 

[Rambunctious]

Of course, it was not, by the very definitions of what is constitutional and what is not.

Dude...fire your team of legal researchers. They are literally ALWAYS wrong

If that were true Trump would have been impeached and flat broke and in jail in a Mexican village....BUUUUUAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In spite of protections provided in the fourth amendment, law enforcement officers (noted in actual wording as “government officials”) are reserved the right to conduct searches under the grounds of probable cause. Today, in essence, this requires law enforcement officers to present their probable cause reasons to a member of the judicial department, which will issue a warrant to search the property. However, search warrants are not a carte blanche invitation to invade privacy, but rather a legally executed search warrant must include:

• Specific reasons of probable cause
• Supported by sworn oaths or affidavits of the officials stating the probable cause
• Includes a specific place, individual, and items being searched

A major setback for team trump...

Prosecutors will find some juice stuff in this pile of material. trump and Cohen are sweating tonight...

If the warrant doesn’t cover it, they won’t.

You do not know the law.

Of course, it was not, by the very definitions of what is constitutional and what is not.

Dude...fire your team of legal researchers. They are literally ALWAYS wrong

If that were true Trump would have been impeached and flat broke and in jail in a Mexican village....BUUUUUAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

Really? THIS is the reasoning you have used to convince yourself?: "Trump is not in jail... therefore Mueller has nothing!"

haha... oh man.... trumpkin gold

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Wow the Dirty Democrats are very proud that using gestapo tactics in our politics.
The Dems are trying to pull off a Junta.
Democrats don't belong in America, they belong in a third world banana republic.

 

[Rambunctious]

Really? THIS is the reasoning you have used to convince yourself?: "Trump is not in jail... therefore Mueller has nothing!"

haha... oh man.... trumpkin gold

Come now...we all know you predicted he would be impeached or in prison by now...Mueller has nothing on Trump...Cohen may be in trouble but will be pardoned...so put the chub back in your pants....

 

[JimH52]

In spite of protections provided in the fourth amendment, law enforcement officers (noted in actual wording as “government officials”) are reserved the right to conduct searches under the grounds of probable cause. Today, in essence, this requires law enforcement officers to present their probable cause reasons to a member of the judicial department, which will issue a warrant to search the property. However, search warrants are not a carte blanche invitation to invade privacy, but rather a legally executed search warrant must include:

• Specific reasons of probable cause
• Supported by sworn oaths or affidavits of the officials stating the probable cause
• Includes a specific place, individual, and items being searched

Prosecutors will find some juice stuff in this pile of material. trump and Cohen are sweating tonight...

If the warrant doesn’t cover it, they won’t.

You do not know the law.

Of course, it was not, by the very definitions of what is constitutional and what is not.

Dude...fire your team of legal researchers. They are literally ALWAYS wrong

If that were true Trump would have been impeached and flat broke and in jail in a Mexican village....BUUUUUAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

Really? THIS is the reasoning you have used to convince yourself?: "Trump is not in jail... therefore Mueller has nothing!"

haha... oh man.... trumpkin gold

You know Trumpettes are not the sharpest knives in the drawer....right?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

we all know you predicted he would be impeached or in prison by now

Not so... I don't think he'll be impeached at all...

Look at you... you only have your little strawman to make you feel smart...

 

[Rambunctious]

Comey just said Trump should not be impeached....no reason for it....

 

[Rambunctious]

Not so... I don't think he'll be impeached at all...

Look at you... you only have your little strawman to make you feel smart...

I have the evidence of history to prove I'm smart and extremely prescient....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Comey just said Trump should not be impeached....no reason for it....

No he didn't, ya weirdo. This is what he said:

Comey said when the question was put to him by ABC's George Stephanopoulos during their interview. "I hope not, because I think impeaching and removing Donald Trump from office would let the American people off the hook and have something happen indirectly that I believe they're duty bound to do directly." -CNN

haha.... noooot exactly a ringing endorsement.