Judge in Georgia Dismisses Three Trump Charges

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You guys need to learn reading comprehension. The problem wasn’t that the evidence didn’t support the alleged crimes. The problem was the allegations were not specific enough for the Defense to properly prepare a cogent defense.

Don't bother. Dell is a bad faith poster.

 

[WEATHER53]

You guys need to learn reading comprehension. The problem wasn’t that the evidence didn’t support the alleged crimes. The problem was the allegations were not specific enough for the Defense to properly prepare a cogent defense.

In essence cheating Again

 

[Rawley]

Hey, unless they are fucking in court, there is no screw up! Bee-otch!

LOL One thing's for certain, those charges that Fani and her fuckbuddy screwed up are no longer in the court.

 

[para bellum]

They threw out a bunch of spaghetti slinging slop and did not identify crimes with the silly ass unprofessional assumption that mere charges were enough
It’s only to smear anyway and not convict

They're just trying to criminalize contesting an election.

No matter what anyone says, it is a huge embarrassment for a prosecutor when the judge dismisses your charges before it even gets to court. That's a class-a fuckup.

 

[Delldude]

You guys need to learn reading comprehension. The problem wasn’t that the evidence didn’t support the alleged crimes. The problem was the allegations were not specific enough for the Defense to properly prepare a cogent defense.

The allegations were fine, it was they hadn't shown any tie to breaking the law they were being charged with.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They're just trying to criminalize contesting an election.

A dumb lie, of course. Contesting an election remains perfectly legal and always will.

Take your evidence to court. Like normal people who aren't in violent cults.

Or sit in the corner with the spoon benders and alien abductees, so we can point and laugh at all of you at once.

The rules never changed.

 

[Billo_Really]

When the lying children get bested they curse. It is your Sentiment that he “had no business making that call”.

Yes, that is correct.

BTW, that's just how I talk.

 

[Rawley]

You guys need to learn reading comprehension. The problem wasn’t that the evidence didn’t support the alleged crimes. The problem was the allegations were not specific enough for the Defense to properly prepare a cogent defense.

Does it really make a difference? Fani and her fuckbuddy made a first year associate mistake. Now those charges are all gone.

 

[Robert W]

As a candidate, he's got no business talking to State election officials, much less asking them to find him 11,000 votes.

You must have been furious with Al Gore. What about Hillary Clinton?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You must have been furious with Al Gore. What about Hillary Clinton?

Don't feed the sealions.

 

[WEATHER53]

You must have been furious with Al Gore. What about Hillary Clinton?

He’s got no business is a sentiment

 

[Billo_Really]

LOL One thing's for certain, those charges that Fani and her fuckbuddy screwed up are no longer in the court.

But all the rest of them are there.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He’s got no business is a sentiment

And extortion of a foreign head of state for personal gain is a high crime.

 

[SavannahMann]

The allegations were fine, it was they hadn't shown any tie to breaking the law they were being charged with.

Reading comprehension.

 

[SavannahMann]

Does it really make a difference? Fani and her fuckbuddy made a first year associate mistake. Now those charges are all gone.

The Judge said they could be refilled. With more specific details on what law was broken and how.

 

[Billo_Really]

You must have been furious with Al Gore. What about Hillary Clinton?

Al Gore just asked for a recount. Then he accepted the bullshit decision by the Supreme Court to stop it. He didn't continue to whine about how he won, like Trump does. Al Gore is an adult. Trump is not.

And what about Hillary? She never tried to manipulate votes.

 

[Delldude]

Reading comprehension.

Yeah...ok....another poster explained it beyond a shadow of a doubt.......para bellum....look him up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Judge said they could be refilled. With more specific details on what law was broken and how.

Which will happen quickly.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Judge said they could be refilled. With more specific details on what law was broken and how.

Yes these overzealous frauds need some nursing along from the judge
Pathetic

 

[Delldude]

The Judge said they could be refilled. With more specific details on what law was broken and how.

They didn't show that the state officials had violated their oath of office. That's it.