Judge presiding in Trump U case is.... LaRaza

[ogibillm]

IF an Irish ethnic politician supports the IRA and wants to bring that war here to the USA then the public should be informed and the man should be voted out of office.

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Here we have an organization who has given top awards to a Jose Gutiérrez who has repeatedly encouraged antiwhite violence and la Raza has never retracted their award.

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

which would matter if the judge was a member of the group you refer to as 'la raza'

of course, it would matter for more than this case. but since he isn't a member of that group what they believe or say is irrelevant.

and he is a member of a legal group associated with la Raza

i know republicans believe otherwise, but repeating a lie over and over does not make it more true.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Stop picking on Donald Trump! He's got a mex judge on his ass about being a con man, and now the entire media is plotting ambushes and he can't blow Bibi enough to keep Bill Kristol from finding someone, any one, to run as a third party candidate.

How many actual supposed victims are suing Trump? Six total in all three law suits. Several of them admit that they thought Trump University was worth their time and money but had nit picks, like Trump not selecting all the instructors himself, etc. This is out of thousands who took his school courses.

This is not a real class action lawsuit, it is a witch hunt presided over by a racist Mexicrat judge.

from the decision granting the motion for class certification:

As to the first two requirements of Rule 23(a), Defendant fails to challenge
Plaintiff’s claim that the putative class is sufficiently numerous or that common
issues of law or fact are common to the class. Plaintiff states that the members of the
proposed nationwide class in this action “number in the thousands,” (Dkt. No. 39-1
at 14), and the Court agrees that this estimate meets the numerosity requirements of
Rule 23(a)(1). See Ikonen v. Hartz Mountain Corp., 122 F.R.D. 258, 262 (S.D. Cal.
1988) (“classes of 40 or more are numerous enough”).

The explicitly named plaintiffs (e.g. Art Cohen) are the class representatives, appointed by the judge, lol

mexicrat. nice.

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

??? i cited the relevant section of the decision to certify class in this exact class action law suit.

 

[bendog]

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

And it is appropriate for the legal team who is bringing the suit to be major donors of the political rival of the Defendant?

lol, only in America

Ah, so now instead of attacking the Judge for racial bias against Trump, you're now saying the lawsuit is politically motivated?

 

[ClosedCaption]

IF an Irish ethnic politician supports the IRA and wants to bring that war here to the USA then the public should be informed and the man should be voted out of office.

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Here we have an organization who has given top awards to a Jose Gutiérrez who has repeatedly encouraged antiwhite violence and la Raza has never retracted their award.

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

No the point is you're a scared shitless white boy afraid of your own shadow because it too is darker than you. Your whining and fear mongering is the stuff of Faggot Lore

 

[JimBowie1958]

IF an Irish ethnic politician supports the IRA and wants to bring that war here to the USA then the public should be informed and the man should be voted out of office.

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Here we have an organization who has given top awards to a Jose Gutiérrez who has repeatedly encouraged antiwhite violence and la Raza has never retracted their award.

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

which would matter if the judge was a member of the group you refer to as 'la raza'

of course, it would matter for more than this case. but since he isn't a member of that group what they believe or say is irrelevant.

and he is a member of a legal group associated with la Raza

i know republicans believe otherwise, but repeating a lie over and over does not make it more true.

simply because ideologues like yourself declare something untrue does not make it untrue

 

[bodecea]

IF an Irish ethnic politician supports the IRA and wants to bring that war here to the USA then the public should be informed and the man should be voted out of office.

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Here we have an organization who has given top awards to a Jose Gutiérrez who has repeatedly encouraged antiwhite violence and la Raza has never retracted their award.

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

which would matter if the judge was a member of the group you refer to as 'la raza'

of course, it would matter for more than this case. but since he isn't a member of that group what they believe or say is irrelevant.

and he is a member of a legal group associated with la Raza

And he is a member of a legal group that has the words "la Raza" in their title.....be very very afraid.

 

[JimBowie1958]

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

And it is appropriate for the legal team who is bringing the suit to be major donors of the political rival of the Defendant?

lol, only in America

Ah, so now instead of attacking the Judge for racial bias against Trump, you're now saying the lawsuit is politically motivated?

I have long said BOTH are true and the judge unfit to oversee this case.

 

[L.K.Eder]

you had to know it was only a matter of time before the racism leaked out

whose racism? trump's or that of the judge?

read the thread.

I did

then read it again, until you realize the stupidity of your question.

nothing stupid about my question. I do not
believe that all citizens of the USA are obligated to learn Spanish, just as they are not
all obligatd to learn French. I read an important book-----written by an important expert in my field written about 100 years ago-----in Great Britain in ENGLISH---in the writing-----the BRIT. included an IMPORTANT example of the phenomenon he was describing by quoting HIS patient------about three pages of FRENCH. At that time all limey educated persons knew FRENCH-----
I don't

can you post something more irrelevant? i think you can

 

[bendog]

Stop picking on Donald Trump! He's got a mex judge on his ass about being a con man, and now the entire media is plotting ambushes and he can't blow Bibi enough to keep Bill Kristol from finding someone, any one, to run as a third party candidate.

How many actual supposed victims are suing Trump? Six total in all three law suits. Several of them admit that they thought Trump University was worth their time and money but had nit picks, like Trump not selecting all the instructors himself, etc. This is out of thousands who took his school courses.

This is not a real class action lawsuit, it is a witch hunt presided over by a racist Mexicrat judge.

from the decision granting the motion for class certification:

As to the first two requirements of Rule 23(a), Defendant fails to challenge
Plaintiff’s claim that the putative class is sufficiently numerous or that common
issues of law or fact are common to the class. Plaintiff states that the members of the
proposed nationwide class in this action “number in the thousands,” (Dkt. No. 39-1
at 14), and the Court agrees that this estimate meets the numerosity requirements of
Rule 23(a)(1). See Ikonen v. Hartz Mountain Corp., 122 F.R.D. 258, 262 (S.D. Cal.
1988) (“classes of 40 or more are numerous enough”).

The explicitly named plaintiffs (e.g. Art Cohen) are the class representatives, appointed by the judge, lol

mexicrat. nice.

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

??? i cited the relevant section of the decision to certify class in this exact class action law suit.

Yes, but you're too ignorant of law to know what it meant.

 

[bodecea]

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

which would matter if the judge was a member of the group you refer to as 'la raza'

of course, it would matter for more than this case. but since he isn't a member of that group what they believe or say is irrelevant.

and he is a member of a legal group associated with la Raza

i know republicans believe otherwise, but repeating a lie over and over does not make it more true.

simply because ideologues like yourself declare something untrue does not make it untrue

It is untrue if it is proven to be untrue....as in the case of your assertions.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Stop picking on Donald Trump! He's got a mex judge on his ass about being a con man, and now the entire media is plotting ambushes and he can't blow Bibi enough to keep Bill Kristol from finding someone, any one, to run as a third party candidate.

How many actual supposed victims are suing Trump? Six total in all three law suits. Several of them admit that they thought Trump University was worth their time and money but had nit picks, like Trump not selecting all the instructors himself, etc. This is out of thousands who took his school courses.

This is not a real class action lawsuit, it is a witch hunt presided over by a racist Mexicrat judge.

from the decision granting the motion for class certification:

As to the first two requirements of Rule 23(a), Defendant fails to challenge
Plaintiff’s claim that the putative class is sufficiently numerous or that common
issues of law or fact are common to the class. Plaintiff states that the members of the
proposed nationwide class in this action “number in the thousands,” (Dkt. No. 39-1
at 14), and the Court agrees that this estimate meets the numerosity requirements of
Rule 23(a)(1). See Ikonen v. Hartz Mountain Corp., 122 F.R.D. 258, 262 (S.D. Cal.
1988) (“classes of 40 or more are numerous enough”).

The explicitly named plaintiffs (e.g. Art Cohen) are the class representatives, appointed by the judge, lol

mexicrat. nice.

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

??? i cited the relevant section of the decision to certify class in this exact class action law suit.

Yes, but you're too ignorant of law to know what it meant.

then please explain, should be enlightening.

 

[bodecea]

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

And it is appropriate for the legal team who is bringing the suit to be major donors of the political rival of the Defendant?

lol, only in America

Ah, so now instead of attacking the Judge for racial bias against Trump, you're now saying the lawsuit is politically motivated?

I have long said BOTH are true and the judge unfit to oversee this case.

And again....with actual FACTS...lay out for us why this judge is unfit.

 

[g5000]

Admit it. This is how you guys have been trained to imagine the judge:

We don't need no stinking trial! I find the defendant Señor Trump guilty.

 

[bendog]

ummm, in any class action, the Judge has to certify that the requirements of the number of plaintiffs and the ability of the named plaintiffs to represent the interests of the entire class of plaintiffs are met. The plaintiff attorneys name the individuals in their complaint, but for the suit to go forward, the judge has to enter an order finding they are appropriate.

But hey, he's just a stinking Mex, unlike you, who is a legal genius.

And it is appropriate for the legal team who is bringing the suit to be major donors of the political rival of the Defendant?

lol, only in America

Ah, so now instead of attacking the Judge for racial bias against Trump, you're now saying the lawsuit is politically motivated?

I have long said BOTH are true and the judge unfit to oversee this case.

Well, you're nuts on both counts. The present law suit was filed in 2014. Trump also was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees of $800K in another case, and the NY attorney general has his own law suit going. Gonzalo P. Curiel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[ogibillm]

I agree, so lets see what your comparison is missing in order to stoke the white fears

Wait, so with the IRA the guy has to support a war and with the Mexican guy an Organization gave an award and you say these are the same thing? LOL


Its always some extra shit with yall white asses. White boys have to support a fucking war before its a problem. The Mexican? All he has to do is stand there and you swear he wants to kill you. Faggot

The point is clear, La Raza morally supports violence against Anglos.

Were not not a Democratic Party hack you would admit it.

which would matter if the judge was a member of the group you refer to as 'la raza'

of course, it would matter for more than this case. but since he isn't a member of that group what they believe or say is irrelevant.

and he is a member of a legal group associated with la Raza

i know republicans believe otherwise, but repeating a lie over and over does not make it more true.

simply because ideologues like yourself declare something untrue does not make it untrue

you have not shown any connection. you have been shown that the group is not a local chapter or affiliate of the national la raza council or any other group. you still insist they are.

you are a liar. if you are not a liar produce the connection.

 

[irosie91]

whose racism? trump's or that of the judge?

read the thread.

I did

then read it again, until you realize the stupidity of your question.

nothing stupid about my question. I do not
believe that all citizens of the USA are obligated to learn Spanish, just as they are not
all obligatd to learn French. I read an important book-----written by an important expert in my field written about 100 years ago-----in Great Britain in ENGLISH---in the writing-----the BRIT. included an IMPORTANT example of the phenomenon he was describing by quoting HIS patient------about three pages of FRENCH. At that time all limey educated persons knew FRENCH-----
I don't

can you post something more irrelevant? i think you can

I could----but will not----it was at a time when everyone in the USA was supposed to be learning Spanish------just a PERSONALLY irritating moment in my life-------the book is terrific----THE RIGHT PARIETAL LOBE ---
Critchley --------broke my heart that I could not
read the FRENCH part

 

[L.K.Eder]

i saw a pigeon in oldtown san diego 3 weeks ago.

 

[bendog]

Admit it. This is how you guys have been trained to imagine the judge:

We don't need no stinking trial! I find the defendant Señor Trump guilty.

They are victims of unfair racial practices, and Trump's their champion.

This is not coincidence. And it's true also for Bernie. But the issues Trump raises are all of some grievance. Make America Great Again. Wages have stagnated, there's no question of that. But Trumpeters need someone to blame. Some one is taking things from them. It's class warfare at it's finest. Huey Long would be proud.

 

[JimH52]

Trump is a carnival barker. Nothing else. He is in the game to enrich Donnie. Nothing else. No matter what you think of Hillary, there is no way a Shyster like Donnie should be Commander in Chief. And thankfully he won't.

 

[bodecea]

read the thread.

I did

then read it again, until you realize the stupidity of your question.

nothing stupid about my question. I do not
believe that all citizens of the USA are obligated to learn Spanish, just as they are not
all obligatd to learn French. I read an important book-----written by an important expert in my field written about 100 years ago-----in Great Britain in ENGLISH---in the writing-----the BRIT. included an IMPORTANT example of the phenomenon he was describing by quoting HIS patient------about three pages of FRENCH. At that time all limey educated persons knew FRENCH-----
I don't

can you post something more irrelevant? i think you can

I could----but will not----it was at a time when everyone in the USA was supposed to be learning Spanish------just a PERSONALLY irritating moment in my life-------the book is terrific----THE RIGHT PARIETAL LOBE ---
Critchley --------broke my heart that I could not
read the FRENCH part