Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not having any basis to make accusations against Trump didn’t stop you hacks when it was about Russia Russia Russia.This has nothing to do with Russia!
The judges actually care about the law, that’s why the cases are proceeding.If judges were actually concerned about the law, and even if they hate Trump, they would be able and willing to dismiss these cases prior to trial.
I am not holding my breath.
Dem assholes have already convicted the guy in their minds. He's guilty according to them prior to a trial or chance to defend himself. Innocent until proven guilty, except in Trump's case.Dummass, you continually invent stupid. What matters isn't Trump's conviction or not, it is his INNOCENCE or not. If Trump is actually guilty of the charges and gets a fair trial, then of course he should be convicted! But then, so should Joe and Hunter Biden.
But nowhere in your diatribe do you say any such thing. Most telling about you is your desire to just see Trump CONVICTED, not whether he is ever actually proven guilty or innocent!
they will invoke immunity act since Trump was president.Trump's lawyers only seek to delay the trial because they don't want the people to hear the truth.
Judge sets absurd trial date for Trump case
except the law says presidents have immunity. damn huh? post #234The judges actually care about the law, that’s why the cases are proceeding.
False. They are proceeding because these judges are ignoring the law.The judges actually care about the law, that’s why the cases are proceeding.
Trump’s Federal Trial on Election Interference Set to Start March 4, 2024 — The Wall Street Journal
Trial date one day before Super Tuesday primaries heightens clash between GOP front-runner’s legal and campaign schedulesapple.news
It is unlikely in the extreme that a massive trial of this magnitude (Constitutionally, politically, historically and legally) will be “ready” for trial that soon. But the judge’s very biased agenda is crystal clear. And it’s unacceptable.
(Since this trial is far more about politics than justice, I chose the politics forum).
What good would of fantasizing his conviction have done?I am sure you accepted OJ's.
I don't live in a world of cosplay like you clowns do.
Awww... a whiny retard came up with a cute name for me... how am I ever going to live that down?Minimus.
He has no such immunity.they will invoke immunity act since Trump was president.
No.... Trump tired to fuck over the right of the people to vote. I hope you're emotionally prepared for his conviction.They are in your case, scumbag.
You have no idea.
But the point here isn’t really about the verdict or the validity of the verdict. A conviction can be set aside on an eventual appeal.
The point here, you imbecile hack, is that the entire show has only one objective: election interference directed against Trump. You unduly politically partisan scumbags don’t even care that you are fucking the right of the People to vote.
You’re an imbecile.
complexdiscovery.com
why? explain why, prove how the immunity clause doesn't work.He has no such immunity.
Thanks, retard. Have you stopped whining or are you going to subject us to some more?You won’t. You’re a pissant. Nothing more.
A conviction infers a judgement of guilt you moron.Dummass, you continually invent stupid. What matters isn't Trump's conviction or not, it is his INNOCENCE or not. If Trump is actually guilty of the charges and gets a fair trial, then of course he should be convicted! But then, so should Joe and Hunter Biden.
But nowhere in your diatribe do you say any such thing. Most telling about you is your desire to just see Trump CONVICTED, not whether he is ever actually proven guilty or innocent!
Dem assholes have already convicted the guy in their minds.
Sure, I can but then how will you ever stop being a retard? Let this be lesson 101. Good luck!So--- you CAN'T name what I'm whining about!Typical Tard.
No they don’t.except the law says presidents have immunity. damn huh? post #234
