Judge strikes down Pennsylvania law barring gay marriage

[g5000]

Oregon had a constitutional amendment. How can a single judge have such powers? I am not against gays and gay marriage.

If Oregon had a constitutional amendment banning all guns, how would you feel if a judge overturned that?

We can't pick and choose which parts of the US Constitution we can violate and which ones we cannot.

Descibe which part of the Constitution guarantees people the right to marry? Don't use the 14th unless you can prove that LGBT behavioral cultees are a race, gender, country of origin or religion...

Recognized religion that is...

One MAN, one WOMAN is gender discrimination, sweet cheeks.

 

[Katzndogz]

If the majority is unwilling to get out in the streets and fight to stop the spread of perversion they deserve what happens. The courts will force perversion on everyone until 70 child porn perverts are just as normal as gays.

 

[JakeStarkey]

It's very good to hear the insults from by the hetero-haters as they back down the street, knowing they are beat.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If the majority is unwilling to get out in the streets and fight to stop the spread of perversion they deserve what happens. The courts will force perversion on everyone until 70 child porn perverts are just as normal as gays.

The majority of adults, and a super majority of millenials, support gay marriage.

 

[Katzndogz]

Judge strikes down Pennsylvania law barring gay marriage

Judge strikes down Pennsylvania law barring gay marriage | Reuters

19 states now, falling like dominoes they are.


may this be an education in why you can vote peoples rights away.

A PERVERT strikes down a law against PERVERTS. Perverts are running the Justice System of this Country.

So what is so perverted about the Judge, he's straight, married to the same woman for 32 years and has two children?


In addition to being a Republican and nominated by a Republican President.


>>>>

He upholds perversion. If the judge ruled that men had a right to rape women in short skirts would it matter that the judge had never committed a rape himself to have a wrong ruling? The judge accepts perversion as normal behavior. That makes him a pervert even if he doesn't practice that particular perversion. Someone should check his desk drawers for child porn.

 

[WorldWatcher]

A PERVERT strikes down a law against PERVERTS. Perverts are running the Justice System of this Country.

So what is so perverted about the Judge, he's straight, married to the same woman for 32 years and has two children?


In addition to being a Republican and nominated by a Republican President.


>>>>

He upholds perversion. If the judge ruled that men had a right to rape women in short skirts would it matter that the judge had never committed a rape himself to have a wrong ruling? The judge accepts perversion as normal behavior. That makes him a pervert even if he doesn't practice that particular perversion. Someone should check his desk drawers for child porn.

Someone might want to check their drawers, that you are correct about.


.............. But the ones needing to check are those that are butt-hurt because the are losing the battle to have to government discriminate against American citizens for capricious and invidious reasons.




>>>>

 

[g5000]

He upholds perversion. If the judge ruled that men had a right to rape women in short skirts would it matter that the judge had never committed a rape himself to have a wrong ruling? The judge accepts perversion as normal behavior. That makes him a pervert even if he doesn't practice that particular perversion. Someone should check his desk drawers for child porn.

So many logical fallacies, so little time.

 

[JFK_USA]

A PERVERT strikes down a law against PERVERTS. Perverts are running the Justice System of this Country.

So what is so perverted about the Judge, he's straight, married to the same woman for 32 years and has two children?


In addition to being a Republican and nominated by a Republican President.


>>>>

He upholds perversion. If the judge ruled that men had a right to rape women in short skirts would it matter that the judge had never committed a rape himself to have a wrong ruling? The judge accepts perversion as normal behavior. That makes him a pervert even if he doesn't practice that particular perversion. Someone should check his desk drawers for child porn.

That's extremely ignorant.

Two adults having a consensual loving relationship isn't perverted. It's love. Quit trying to force your views onto other people's relationship. They have the right to pursue happiness and if they are adults, they can have a relationship with whoever they want to male or female.

 

[Plasmaball]

notice how when they start loosing more and more states, the more vile they become.

such hatred..

 

[bodecea]

A PERVERT strikes down a law against PERVERTS. Perverts are running the Justice System of this Country.

So what is so perverted about the Judge, he's straight, married to the same woman for 32 years and has two children?


In addition to being a Republican and nominated by a Republican President.


>>>>

He upholds perversion. If the judge ruled that men had a right to rape women in short skirts would it matter that the judge had never committed a rape himself to have a wrong ruling? The judge accepts perversion as normal behavior. That makes him a pervert even if he doesn't practice that particular perversion. Someone should check his desk drawers for child porn.

So...here we see that Katzdogz cannot or will not see the clear difference between gay marriage and rape. Don't really need to add to that, do we?

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans were on top of the gay marriage issue before it even was an issue. They started passing amendments banning gay marriage before anyone was even looking to allow it

Now all those amendments to state constitutions are being challenged and the courts are saying....what were we thinking?

The anti gay marriage amendments are falling like a house of cards

 

[JoeB131]

[

Shhhh.. If you listen very carefully, you can hear millions of middle voters' feet shuffle ever so slightly to the right.

The democratic election strategy machine is still in the same shape it's always been:

1. Promote three-legged horses for a horse race

2. Allow the most extreme in their party to sculpt the platform.

3. Wonder where all those middle votes went the day after the polls close.

4. Drink lots of alchohol, brush themselves off and begin planning the same strategy for the next election cycle, chanting the mantra "the same strategy will fix it next time"...

I think you've been drinking Alcohol.

The Republicans have lost the popular vote in 5 of the last six presidential elections.

The only one they won in 2004, they had incumbancy (due to stealing the last one), an ongoing war (we've never voted out a president in the middle of a war) and an economy that didn't completely suck, and he STILL only barely won.

 

[bodecea]

Oregon had a constitutional amendment. How can a single judge have such powers? I am not against gays and gay marriage.

If Oregon had a constitutional amendment banning all guns, how would you feel if a judge overturned that?

We can't pick and choose which parts of the US Constitution we can violate and which ones we cannot.

Descibe which part of the Constitution guarantees people the right to marry? Don't use the 14th unless you can prove that LGBT behavioral cultees are a race, gender, country of origin or religion...

Recognized religion that is...

If the government offers civil marriage, they cannot deny it based on gender.

 

[GreenBean]

Gay marriageis the new Roe v. Wade. Both legal shifts actually touh the lives of very, very few of the people most outraged by them. It isn't the impact on each of us that makes thse issues political zingers, it's the implication that something that has always been wrong is now suddenly OK. The do's and dont's of our sexual behavior are the post holes that anchor our society. Gay marriage and legal abortion are unmistakeable signs that the old order is slipping away. For most conservatives, the new order is characterized by sexual license but unaccompanied by increased wealth, power, or status for them personally.The hedge fund guys are fine with the new order and don't give a damn about to broads who want to marry each other or terminate a pregnancy. But for the conservative majority, whose house is worth less, whose retirment fund has shrunk and whose paychecks aren't keeping up with rising prices, gay marriage and abortion are symbols of their own social loss.

I would agree that this is what is driving their hatred of other people. My assumption is that they are older and they have known only this way of thought their entire lives. Now they feel they are being pushed to the side and being vilified for what they were taught when they were young.

So I think it's about them trying to hold onto their legacy and keep their ideals from dying along with them. The problem with that is that those are ideas that promote discrimination, bigotry and prejudice. That's fundamentally wrong. All people are equal and all love is equal

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”

“What luck for rulers that men do not think.”

“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise.”

“The receptivity of the masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan.”

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

 

[Silhouette]

If the government offers civil marriage, they cannot deny it based on gender.

They don't. In all but three states, any man may marry any woman who he isn't related to closely by blood. And he can only marry one of them. And both have to be legal adults who are consenting.

In three states the ACT [verb] of marrying a person of your same gender is allowed by law. In the other 47 states, as Upheld by Windsor 2013, the ACT [verb] of marrying someone of your same gender, multiple people, incest and minors is illegal.

 

[rightwinger]

If the government offers civil marriage, they cannot deny it based on gender.

They don't. In all but three states, any man may marry any woman who he isn't related to closely by blood. And he can only marry one of them. And both have to be legal adults who are consenting.

In three states the ACT [verb] of marrying a person of your same gender is allowed by law. In the other 47 states, as Upheld by Windsor 2013, the ACT [verb] of marrying someone of your same gender, multiple people, incest and minors is illegal.

Dimwits are still trying to play the card...

Gays can marry people of the opposite sex so everything is fair

 

[Freewill]

If the government offers civil marriage, they cannot deny it based on gender.

They don't. In all but three states, any man may marry any woman who he isn't related to closely by blood. And he can only marry one of them. And both have to be legal adults who are consenting.

In three states the ACT [verb] of marrying a person of your same gender is allowed by law. In the other 47 states, as Upheld by Windsor 2013, the ACT [verb] of marrying someone of your same gender, multiple people, incest and minors is illegal.

Dimwits are still trying to play the card...

Gays can marry people of the opposite sex so everything is fair

Yeah and you can't go fishing with a hunting license, seems so unfair to have laws.

 

[nodoginnafight]

If you don't defend the Constitution when it supports someone you disagree with, you are essentially wiping your ass with the Constitution.

 

[rightwinger]

They don't. In all but three states, any man may marry any woman who he isn't related to closely by blood. And he can only marry one of them. And both have to be legal adults who are consenting.

In three states the ACT [verb] of marrying a person of your same gender is allowed by law. In the other 47 states, as Upheld by Windsor 2013, the ACT [verb] of marrying someone of your same gender, multiple people, incest and minors is illegal.

Dimwits are still trying to play the card...

Gays can marry people of the opposite sex so everything is fair

Yeah and you can't go fishing with a hunting license, seems so unfair to have laws.

The laws are changing...haven't you noticed?

 

[Silhouette]

Dimwits are still trying to play the card...

Gays can marry people of the opposite sex so everything is fair

Yeah and you can't go fishing with a hunting license, seems so unfair to have laws.

The laws are changing...haven't you noticed?

No, they aren't. Gay marriage is only allowed in 3 states according to Windsor. When you say "laws", make sure you include the Supreme Law of the land from 2013. It renders all the activist-judges contempt meaningless...as you will soon find out...