Dick Foster
Platinum Member
Well my IQ is above average by a bit and I don't mind. In fact the last time I sat on a jury, a double murder which it wasn't, it was a good damn thing for the defendant that I was there. I was the only one that saved his ass and forced a conviction for what was real.Are you suggesting that a person of reasonable intelligence wants to be on a jury?Not always. Some may even want to do it.The intelligent people get out of it.And that is a problem. Maybe you should spend some time trying to fathom why we have laws in the first place, dummy.Fuck matters of the law, what really matters is what is right, what is wrong and what makes sense and that's exactly why juries make the most sense to me.Just what we need yet another bunch of professional parasites sucking the taxpayer tit and fucking up every damn thing they touch. I have one thing they don't, common fucking sense.I never understood why we need to yank 12 random people out of their lives to serve on a jury anyway.
Why can't a judge decide if the evidence merits a guilty or not guilty verdict ?
Or maybe we should institute a professional juror system.
People with some knowledge of the law, the rights of the accused and the victims and at least some basic understanding of forensic science instead of a bunch of people who don't know anything about those things
So you want the government to force you to work on a jury for who knows how long for a couple bucks an hour?
The average IQ of the public is 100 I sure as shit don't want these average idiots deciding matters of law
right and wrong don't mean anything in court.
HAving stupid people on a jury is the problem
No.