Michelle420
Diamond Member
If they go to divorce court and sue for half of the belongings which spouses are getting things? ![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Polygamy marriage could also be a female with several husbands, or same sex multiples.
Besides religious reasons people get married for other legal benefits, I am not sure how that would work if you could claim 10 spouses on your taxes or how social security would be paid out etc etc....
What if you have 10 children? What's the difference?
Well I am not sure, could a family of ten husbands or ten wives apply for welfare if only one spouse works?![]()
If they fall below the federal poverty guidelines then yes.
If a spouse is on life support which spouse is going to make medical decisions? I guess they would new laws to iron out new issues.
I guess that is between the family members.
If they go to divorce court and sue for half of the belongings which spouses are getting things?![]()
What if you have 10 children? What's the difference?
Well I am not sure, could a family of ten husbands or ten wives apply for welfare if only one spouse works?![]()
If they fall below the federal poverty guidelines then yes.
If a spouse is on life support which spouse is going to make medical decisions? I guess they would new laws to iron out new issues.
I guess that is between the family members.
Sure but new laws would probably need to be in tact to.
You dumb clit. Gay marriage wasn't legal either. Have your guardian change your diaper and pop a fresh pacifier into your chubby face.Find a 4th grader to explain to you the difference between NOT-legal and ILLEGAL.....That's the point Mr. Thirdgrader. Your argument is that it's illegal. Sorta like gay marriage was, except with 7,000 years more history.
You dumb clit. Gay marriage wasn't legal either.
You aren't grown up and you damn sure aren't a man, so dumb clit works for me. Slavery was legal at one time too, didn't make it right. The gay argument pretends it's in a vacuum and nothing else can be considered. Wrong.Well, I guess this nitwit STILL can't find a grown up to explain simple legal terms for him.....You dumb clit. Gay marriage wasn't legal either.
BTW, "you dumb clit" is not the right bashing to be applied to an almost 70 year old MAN.
Yet another reason for you to find the guidance of a grown-up.
I know, I was just making talking points.
You aren't grown up and you damn sure aren't a man, so dumb clit works for me. Slavery was legal at one time too, didn't make it right. The gay argument pretends it's in a vacuum and nothing else can be considered. Wrong.Well, I guess this nitwit STILL can't find a grown up to explain simple legal terms for him.....You dumb clit. Gay marriage wasn't legal either.
BTW, "you dumb clit" is not the right bashing to be applied to an almost 70 year old MAN.
Yet another reason for you to find the guidance of a grown-up.
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
So... how is having more than one wife or husband "immoral"?
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
How can two brothers cause a deformed baby? Incest laws are in place to prevent such things and most people find it immoral. So you are saying you would be against it because it's illegal? Where's the consistency? Brothers work and pay taxes too. You simply wanted morality defined your way.So... how is having more than one wife or husband "immoral"?
I
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
No I do not. I do not have to approve of incest to approve of gay marriage. Why do you say that? Gay people work, pay taxes and contribute to the economy. Why do you want to deny them the opportunity to be married?
Edit: Sorry Ashtara, I quoted your post accidentally.![]()
How can two brothers cause a deformed baby? Incest laws are in place to prevent such things and most people find it immoral. So you are saying you would be against it because it's illegal? Where's the consistency? Brothers work and pay taxes too. You simply wanted morality defined your way.So... how is having more than one wife or husband "immoral"?
I
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
No I do not. I do not have to approve of incest to approve of gay marriage. Why do you say that? Gay people work, pay taxes and contribute to the economy. Why do you want to deny them the opportunity to be married?
Edit: Sorry Ashtara, I quoted your post accidentally.![]()
How many times do I need to say it should be up to the population in a state, not me or you.I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
Why does what "you" want matter to anyone else except when applied to your own situation?
I did. It's still there.How can two brothers cause a deformed baby? Incest laws are in place to prevent such things and most people find it immoral. So you are saying you would be against it because it's illegal? Where's the consistency? Brothers work and pay taxes too. You simply wanted morality defined your way.So... how is having more than one wife or husband "immoral"?
I
I've said why many times. Do you approve of two brothers marrying? To be consistent you would need to, I don't want marriage defined to include anyone. There's no equality issue with brothers marrying.The word equality is being misused.Why are you against gay marriage? I really do not understand why people would be so dead set against it. I find it stunning the amount of resistance there is to giving all of our citizens the same rights and privileges. Does it really matter who they sleep with when it comes to be treated as an equal in our country? We are better than that, I think.
But I've also said that it should be up to the people of a state the way it has been. Society has the right to define itself.
No I do not. I do not have to approve of incest to approve of gay marriage. Why do you say that? Gay people work, pay taxes and contribute to the economy. Why do you want to deny them the opportunity to be married?
Edit: Sorry Ashtara, I quoted your post accidentally.![]()
No. You answer MY questions.