PoliticalTorch
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Sounds like you're talking more to the RWers around here. So, when are you going to go after them?[MENTION=49586]Inevitable[/MENTION]
This is....well....just too good to pass up. It is an experience many will not soon forget!
If Gay Guys Said the Stuff Straight People Say | The Bilerico Project
You can't reason with these people. Look at some of the crap they post. In their mind it's okay to restrict freedom to homosexuals because they believe that it's going to "end the world" or "encourage children to be homosexual" or "that homosexuals are pedophiles" or what have you. Basically their ends justify their means. Their views are borderline sociopathic. The homosexual population has already been demonized. You won't make them see the error of their ways, they don't believe they have made an error.
Thus all you should do is mock them. Provoke them into cussing you out, give them enough ropeto hang themselves. Sit back and watch.
^ Isn't it just as unfair to generalize "these people" as unable to reason with. ^
Aren't you as fast to point out flaws when other people generalize that
"liberals are lying to themselves and can't be reasoned with" -- where
people deliberately focus on just the bad examples to discredit everyone else.
Don't you hate that, so why do the same thing?
there are some people who DO attack religion and think it is all bad and harmful.
as there are those who fear all homosexuality as bad and harmful.
By why keep focusing the media and discussion on THOSE folks;
why not demand that the focus be placed on GOOD examples of people who CAN have constructive dialogue
and include all differences without this fearbased slamming and rejection going on. Why give the bad examples all the attention?
Isn't it equally unfair to say that all people in those groups are trying to do that?
I agree there are closedminded extremists in any group,
and it's only fair to go after those in your own camps equally as you would elsewhere
to stop the projections and generalizations blocking constructive communication.