Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Answer the question, scumbag.
Where did those 3 Million people go? Where?
Here's why you are stupid.... The ignorant fucks doing the numbers are factoring in the Participation Rate.
Which is a stupid thing to do for 21 year-olds. Beyond stupid.
The participation rate applies to every one at every age. A forty-nine year-old Soccer Mom isn't likely to be working. Neither are people who are in their 50's and can afford to retire.
Fine, apply the PR (participation rate) to the population in general but to 21 year-olds?
Stupidity at its finest.
Now, it is true that that maybe 2 Million People are leaving the work force as my 3 Million are entering it but the fact remains......
Those three million kids are looking for work.
Or did Occupy Wall Street never happen?
You people are like Dodo Birds.
A Dodo Bird is a now extinct Bird who flew in decreasingly concentric circles until he disappeared up his own asshole.
You.
I don't mind being contradicted, just tell me how you got there and why.
Don't just post some article from some 25 year-old punk out of J School for a year.
butt head
You answered your own question, genius. As the 3 million are entering the workforce, another 2 million are leaving. Those 3 million kids are looking for work at different times. Some are going to work right out of high school. Others go to college for 4 years. Others going to college for 8 years. Some will never end up working because they are lazy.
We are talking about a net gain of jobs here with the 192k number, not how many people were newly employed during a month.
I'm sticking by my 250,000 estimate.
dimocraps lie. It's what they do. ALL of them
US workforce expands as more job seekers seek jobs ? The Register
economists say you need around 250,000 jobs per month to keep up with the young entering the labor force and older workers holding onto their jobs because, let's face it, for many of those old folks, retirement is not really an option.
Two Million Fewer Americans Are Employed Than Were a Year Ago
This is supposed to be the fifth year of an economic recovery, but the jobs numbers continue to badly underperform. In February, U.S. employers added 175,000 workers to their payrolls, but thats still below the 200,000 to 250,000 a month we need to bring down the real unemployment rate and to keep pace with young people entering the workforce.
But the employment anemia is still plaguing the U.S. economy. The labor force participation rate (63 percent) remains stuck at or near its lowest point since the late 1970s when the Bee Gees were the hottest music group in America. Amazingly, there are more than 2 million FEWER Americans in the labor force today than one year ago. Usually recoveries bring more Americans into the workforce.
Another troubling sign: weekly hours worked dipped by 0.2 hours in February. How much the record snow and cold impacted these numbers is yet undetermined.
The number of long term unemployed (six months or more) also rose by 203,000. Americans who lose their jobs are having a very hard time finding new ones.
Since this recovery began, job growth has maintained an underwhelming pace of half the employment growth of the average recovery. If the number of jobs had just kept pace with the growth of food stamps recipients, we would have at least 2 million more Americans working today. If the economy were where Obama promised it would be when he signed his stimulus bill, we would have at least 3 million more jobs and an unemployment rate of 5 percent.
Its time for the White House to get serious about an aggressive jobs agenda. Right now it isnt. Its two big ideas, Obamacare and the minimum wage hike, would erase nearly 3 million more jobs.
A pro-jobs agenda would mean suspending Obamacare, cutting tax rates on businesses, ending regulations that choke off jobs especially in the energy industry and bringing down government spending and debt to free up private sector resources. For the near 20 million Americans unemployed, underemployed, or out of the labor force, this is no recovery at all.
People like you..... You're no different than the communist cadre in Cuba or in the now-deceased Soviet Union.
You don't care about "The People". You don't care about the Country.
All you care about is "The Party"
"The Party Uber Alles" right douchebag?
Now, you'll convince yourself that the reason you back 'The Party' is that it's what's best for The People.
But I'll tell you something that I know for a FUCKING FACT....
scumbags like you.... You'll always make excuses for "The Party". Always have, always will.
Even if they started throwing dissenters in gulags or Concentration Camps, you'd defend "The Party".
And after they crank up the ovens, you'll pretend not to know
Like I've always said.... I know who you are. I know what you are. History is littered with the genocides and murders and wars caused by scumbags like you.
Keep defending "The Party" against all evidence.
It's what you do
Well Sallow...............Last year their were over 80,000 pages in the CFR.
Like 3600 new regulations.
Yet you still want more Gov't..............How many regulations per year is enough for you and your party of excuses................................
Are you saying less regulation creates jobs?
I just pointed out they don't.
Reagan cut regulations, that didn't help create jobs.
Bush defunded regulators and that didn't help create jobs.
Quite the contrary. Both those things led to financial cataclysm which LOST jobs.
Add in, both cut taxes on the wealthy and THAT didn't create jobs.
Reagan and Bush actually needed the government to HIRE more people to LOWER unemployment.
Conservatives have STOPPED Obama from doing that.
Again more excuses.................Under Reagan our economy recovered, after a major recession and stagflation.
Which of course you just refuse to acknowledge because it hurts your boot licking defense of Obama and the Dems...............
If the GOP have stopped Obama please explain how we are still getting about 10 new regulations a day now...................
Did they magically stop.......................
No they didn't...............
But let's just ignore that as Gov't agencies create new regs
shhhhhhhhhhhhh.....................
Are you saying less regulation creates jobs?
I just pointed out they don't.
Reagan cut regulations, that didn't help create jobs.
Bush defunded regulators and that didn't help create jobs.
Quite the contrary. Both those things led to financial cataclysm which LOST jobs.
Add in, both cut taxes on the wealthy and THAT didn't create jobs.
Reagan and Bush actually needed the government to HIRE more people to LOWER unemployment.
Conservatives have STOPPED Obama from doing that.
Again more excuses.................Under Reagan our economy recovered, after a major recession and stagflation.
Which of course you just refuse to acknowledge because it hurts your boot licking defense of Obama and the Dems...............
If the GOP have stopped Obama please explain how we are still getting about 10 new regulations a day now...................
Did they magically stop.......................
No they didn't...............
But let's just ignore that as Gov't agencies create new regs
shhhhhhhhhhhhh.....................
Regulations don't kill jobs.
Quite the contrary.
And Reagan's "miracle" was explained to you.
You can stop licking his gravestone.
We only added 192K jobs?
How does that compare to the 770K jobs we were losing the last time Republicans were in charge?
Again more excuses.................Under Reagan our economy recovered, after a major recession and stagflation.
Which of course you just refuse to acknowledge because it hurts your boot licking defense of Obama and the Dems...............
If the GOP have stopped Obama please explain how we are still getting about 10 new regulations a day now...................
Did they magically stop.......................
No they didn't...............
But let's just ignore that as Gov't agencies create new regs
shhhhhhhhhhhhh.....................
Regulations don't kill jobs.
Quite the contrary.
And Reagan's "miracle" was explained to you.
You can stop licking his gravestone.
Only in a Liberal World...................Regulations cost money and increase overhead forcing actions that can lead to cut backs to comply with the regulations.
But of course you will ignore that kind of information because you want a nanny state.
We only added 192K jobs?
How does that compare to the 770K jobs we were losing the last time Republicans were in charge?
Change the subject on your parties failures as normal..................
Perhaps you can create some jobs by taxing the chit out of businesses...........
Yep, that will fix everything................
Regulations don't kill jobs.
Quite the contrary.
And Reagan's "miracle" was explained to you.
You can stop licking his gravestone.
Only in a Liberal World...................Regulations cost money and increase overhead forcing actions that can lead to cut backs to comply with the regulations.
But of course you will ignore that kind of information because you want a nanny state.
And..that's never ever happened.
Quite the contrary.
Companies hire MORE people to comply.
Additionally the government need MORE people to do the checking.
Additionally, companies don't have to worry about competing with other companies that are cutting corners.
You really don't know much about business, do you?
We only added 192K jobs?
How does that compare to the 770K jobs we were losing the last time Republicans were in charge?
Change the subject on your parties failures as normal..................
Perhaps you can create some jobs by taxing the chit out of businesses...........
Yep, that will fix everything................
We only added 192K jobs?
How does that compare to the 770K jobs we were losing the last time Republicans were in charge?
Change the subject on your parties failures as normal..................
Perhaps you can create some jobs by taxing the chit out of businesses...........
Yep, that will fix everything................
The last time we trusted the country to Republicans they were given an unemployment rate of 4.2% and left an unemployment rate of 8.1%
We only added 192K jobs?
How does that compare to the 770K jobs we were losing the last time Republicans were in charge?
Change the subject on your parties failures as normal..................
Perhaps you can create some jobs by taxing the chit out of businesses...........
Yep, that will fix everything................
The last time we trusted the country to Republicans they were given an unemployment rate of 4.2% and left an unemployment rate of 8.1%
Well Sallow...............Last year their were over 80,000 pages in the CFR.
Like 3600 new regulations.
Yet you still want more Gov't..............How many regulations per year is enough for you and your party of excuses................................
Are you saying less regulation creates jobs?
I just pointed out they don't.
Reagan cut regulations, that didn't help create jobs.
Bush defunded regulators and that didn't help create jobs.
Quite the contrary. Both those things led to financial cataclysm which LOST jobs.
Add in, both cut taxes on the wealthy and THAT didn't create jobs.
Reagan and Bush actually needed the government to HIRE more people to LOWER unemployment.
Conservatives have STOPPED Obama from doing that.
It's to be expected when Democrats are in charge. First day off other than a rain out in 3 weeks.
The Democrats are the poster children of unemployment.
Because when a Democratic President is in place, Republicans block spending for new government hires,
It's to be expected when Democrats are in charge. First day off other than a rain out in 3 weeks.
The Democrats are the poster children of unemployment.
Because when a Democratic President is in place, Republicans block spending for new government hires,
Change the subject on your parties failures as normal..................
Perhaps you can create some jobs by taxing the chit out of businesses...........
Yep, that will fix everything................
The last time we trusted the country to Republicans they were given an unemployment rate of 4.2% and left an unemployment rate of 8.1%
A lie.
Republicans took the House and Senate in 1994. Fact
the rapist, Clinton, saw the handwriting on the wall and went along with Newt Gingrich in virtually everything Republicans wanted to do.
Fact.
The economy was doing fine until dimocrap scum took back the House and Senate in 2006.
Fact.
You are an ignorant, lying dirtbag.
Fact
True story.
It's to be expected when Democrats are in charge. First day off other than a rain out in 3 weeks.
The Democrats are the poster children of unemployment.
Because when a Democratic President is in place, Republicans block spending for new government hires,
Sallow's solution to chronic unemployment, is to make GOVERNMENT bigger???
It's to be expected when Democrats are in charge. First day off other than a rain out in 3 weeks.
The Democrats are the poster children of unemployment.
Because when a Democratic President is in place, Republicans block spending for new government hires,
Sallow's solution to chronic unemployment, is to make GOVERNMENT bigger???
