Kalipornia Dimocrats vote down bill outlawing sex-selection abortion

[Vigilante]

It’s official: the feminist movement and their willing servants in the California Democratic Party are willing to see in utero females killed because they are female in order to protect their existing legal right to abortion. You can’t make an abortion omelet without breaking a few zygotes. Daniel Nussbaum of Breitbart reports:

On Tuesday, thirteen Democrats on the California State Assembly Health Committee voted down a bill that would have outlawed the practice of sex selection through abortion.
The Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (AB 2336) ran into opposition by all of the Democrats on the committee, who saw the bill as a prelude to broader abortion restrictions, according to a report from LifeNews.com. Instead, Democrats introduced a resolution to condemn sex-selection abortion--but not to outlaw it.
The bill was introduced on May 6th by Assemblywoman Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield), who said in her opening testimony that "the U.N. estimates that upwards of 200 million girls around the world have been aborted merely because they were 'the wrong gender.'" She explained that countries like India and China are dominated by a male-child mentality, with mothers preferring future working men and family providers over the "burden" of baby girls.
​

The bill was defeated 13-6 on a straight party line vote.

So which party is it that has a war on women?

American Thinker ^

 

[Howey]

Or it's around about way for right wingers to outlaw abortion altogether. Nice try though.

Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women's Access to Abortion

At the end of the day, these advocates are fiercely denouncing PRENDA and its copycats because of their deep-seated conviction that the true motivations of the measures’ proponents have everything to do with undermining abortion rights and nothing to do with fighting gender discrimination—and that, in fact, the measures themselves threaten only to exacerbate that very problem. In written testimony opposing PRENDA, 24 organizations from the reproductive justice community had this to say: “This anti-choice measure dressed as an anti-discrimination bill…further exacerbates inequities and diminishes the health, well-being, and dignity of women and girls by restricting their access to reproductive health care. We represent the women and people of color this bill purports to protect, and we are announcing our unequivocal condemnation of it.”18 -

 

[CaféAuLait]

What's next, eye color?

Hair color?

If the fetus can be tested to see if they are gay, transsexual, or straight, then aborted because the parent disagrees with such?

China is too the point in a few years 1 in every 4 adult men will not be able to marry because there are no women for them.

 

[Vigilante]

Or it's around about way for right wingers to outlaw abortion altogether. Nice try though.

Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women's Access to Abortion

At the end of the day, these advocates are fiercely denouncing PRENDA and its copycats because of their deep-seated conviction that the true motivations of the measures’ proponents have everything to do with undermining abortion rights and nothing to do with fighting gender discrimination—and that, in fact, the measures themselves threaten only to exacerbate that very problem. In written testimony opposing PRENDA, 24 organizations from the reproductive justice community had this to say: “This anti-choice measure dressed as an anti-discrimination bill…further exacerbates inequities and diminishes the health, well-being, and dignity of women and girls by restricting their access to reproductive health care. We represent the women and people of color this bill purports to protect, and we are announcing our unequivocal condemnation of it.”18 -

No, it's simply democrap/subverives continuing their war on women... why else kill ONLY FEMALES????.... Why not pick JUST MALES???

 

[Howey]

What's a subverive?

 

[Vigilante]

What's a subverive?

Some asshole that pulls his shirt up advertising his wares for sale!

 

[Political Junky]

Some areas of CA do welcome the Right, like Orange County [behind the Orange Curtain].

 

[theHawk]

Abortion makes too much money for liberals, they can't have it hindered in any way possible.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Politico]

Even if it has passed there would be no way to enforce it. The whole thing is ridiculous.

 

[I.P.Freely]

Or it's around about way for right wingers to outlaw abortion altogether. Nice try though.

Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women's Access to Abortion

At the end of the day, these advocates are fiercely denouncing PRENDA and its copycats because of their deep-seated conviction that the true motivations of the measures’ proponents have everything to do with undermining abortion rights and nothing to do with fighting gender discrimination—and that, in fact, the measures themselves threaten only to exacerbate that very problem. In written testimony opposing PRENDA, 24 organizations from the reproductive justice community had this to say: “This anti-choice measure dressed as an anti-discrimination bill…further exacerbates inequities and diminishes the health, well-being, and dignity of women and girls by restricting their access to reproductive health care. We represent the women and people of color this bill purports to protect, and we are announcing our unequivocal condemnation of it.”18 -

thank for the article, I actuality have no problem with gender selective abortions as long as its the hosts decision.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

So which party is it that has a war on women?

The GOP, clearly, given its propensity to seek to violate a woman’s right to privacy.

This inane proposed measure by republicans being one such example; not only is it a ‘solution’ in search of a problem, but it would be impossible to ‘enforce.’

This is nothing more than partisan demagoguery by republicans.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What's next, eye color?

Hair color?

No.

What’s next is you and other rightists engaging in slippery slope fallacies, such as this.

 

[TemplarKormac]

This is atrocious. The very idea of aborting the child because she's a she is... misogynist is it not?

 

[TemplarKormac]

So which party is it that has a war on women?

The GOP, clearly, given its propensity to seek to violate a woman’s right to privacy.

This inane proposed measure by republicans being one such example; not only is it a ‘solution’ in search of a problem, but it would be impossible to ‘enforce.’

This is nothing more than partisan demagoguery by republicans.

The GOP, clearly, given its propensity to seek to violate a woman’s right to privacy.

And the NSA violating their privacy doesn't count because? Oh and lets not forget how Joe Biden began attacking Hillary earlier this week. I don't hear any of you howling about him being sexist.

This inane proposed measure by republicans being one such example; not only is it a ‘solution’ in search of a problem, but it would be impossible to ‘enforce.’

Um, yeah, that's probably what you think of enforcing our immigration laws too.

This is nothing more than partisan demagoguery by republicans.

So, how is polluting a woman's mind with some sense of 'choice' not a form of political demagoguery?

 

[TemplarKormac]

What's next, eye color?

Hair color?

No.

What’s next is you and other rightists engaging in slippery slope fallacies, such as this.

Slippery slope:

"Republicans are anti choice, they want to deny you contraceptive care, and etc. They are sexists."

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What's a subverive?

Some asshole that pulls his shirt up advertising his wares for sale!

No, that’s an expression of individual liberty, as guaranteed by the 5th Amendment’s Liberty Clause, something you and others on the right fear, hence your hostility to diversity and dissent, and your desire to enhance the authority of the state at the expense of citizens’ civil liberties.

The republican proposed measure being one such example.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Or it's around about way for right wingers to outlaw abortion altogether. Nice try though.

Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women's Access to Abortion

At the end of the day, these advocates are fiercely denouncing PRENDA and its copycats because of their deep-seated conviction that the true motivations of the measures’ proponents have everything to do with undermining abortion rights and nothing to do with fighting gender discrimination—and that, in fact, the measures themselves threaten only to exacerbate that very problem. In written testimony opposing PRENDA, 24 organizations from the reproductive justice community had this to say: “This anti-choice measure dressed as an anti-discrimination bill…further exacerbates inequities and diminishes the health, well-being, and dignity of women and girls by restricting their access to reproductive health care. We represent the women and people of color this bill purports to protect, and we are announcing our unequivocal condemnation of it.”18 -

No, it's simply democrap/subverives continuing their war on women... why else kill ONLY FEMALES????.... Why not pick JUST MALES???

So, tell me, Vagisil, where are the EXACT statistics that show that anyone wants to use abortion selection to specifically kill female fetuses?

Time to put some facts on the table, Vagisil.

Full disclosure: I am pro-life and I personally think that abortion is wrong.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Or it's around about way for right wingers to outlaw abortion altogether. Nice try though.

Sex-selective Abortion Bans: A Disingenuous New Strategy to Limit Women's Access to Abortion

No, it's simply democrap/subverives continuing their war on women... why else kill ONLY FEMALES????.... Why not pick JUST MALES???

So, tell me, Vagisil, where are the EXACT statistics that show that anyone wants to use abortion selection to specifically kill female fetuses?

Time to put some facts on the table, Vagisil.

Full disclosure: I am pro-life and I personally think that abortion is wrong.

Everyone’s pro-life and considers abortion wrong, the conflict arises as to the solution to the problem, and the desire of most on the right to violate citizens’ civil liberties in pursuit of their ‘solution’ that simply won’t work.

Having failed in the courts, the OP and others on the social right now resort to demagoguery, such as this inane proposed measure now thankfully defeated.