Yes you did and continue to lieNot at all. You must be mistaken again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes you did and continue to lieNot at all. You must be mistaken again
And as said from day one - the court found misconduct but stated it wasn't enough to alter the results,I encourage everyone to read the judges ruling. It’s less than ten pages and the core is page 4-9 or only 6 pages.
https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/e4/68/14d0244c408a960f45ccddbaaf14/lakecourtruling.pdf
That could be due to the fact that the print and web media was not reporting the details and you're stuck in headline mode.I posted looking for somebody to make an argument not give me videos to watch
Court found no misconduct. The judge said no proof of that was submitted only hearsay and “if it was true” it was only 50 votes and none were accused of being invalid or altered. Total made up BS.And as said from day one - the court found misconduct but stated it wasn't enough to alter the results,
View attachment 742236
Damage was shown; intent was not shown because there's no video or audio of anyone planning this scheme.
Too bad this article doesn't give details.
Check out this guy's videos.
But they weren't. I mean as Walker told us, a werewolf can kill a vampire, but they don't.Those ballots could have been changed by poll workers. That is a fact. The election ballots on demand were made that way on purpose.
You cannot prove they were not changed, can you?But they weren't. I mean as Walker told us, a werewolf can kill a vampire, but they don't.
And then counted later. Also there were only 1,300 like that. 1,300 is less than 17,000.It is not a fantasy. Those machines failed. 19 inch ballots will be rejected every time.
I cannot prove the Arizona has been taken over by the Pod People either. But I don't have to. It's incumbent on the plaintiff to prove their case. They failed to submit evidence that anyone was disenfranchised.You cannot prove they were not changed, can you?
But there was all kind of evidence the election was run like total shit.I cannot prove the Arizona has been taken over by the Pod People either. But I don't have to. It's incumbent on the plaintiff to prove their case. They failed to submit evidence that anyone was disenfranchised.
Why do you think women are toxic? Do you think men are equally toxic, doll? Love, beautress.
Dumbass Nazi.
They were proven in court.
That a judge did what I said he would do from the start and ruled that they didn't alter the election in no way changes the fact that Katie Hobbs tampered with the election by providing the wrong ballots in Republican districts for the purpose of disenfranchising voters.
None was submitted. As Republicans were running it, Democrats should be the ones complaining.But there was all kind of evidence the election was run like total shit.
And as said from day one - the court found misconduct but stated it wasn't enough to alter the results,
View attachment 742236
Stop the Republican bullshit. Those assholes are part of the uniparty who tell you who will be elected and then making sure it happens. Lake was too popular to lose and anyone with any honesty would admit that. That leaves you out.None was submitted. As Republicans were running it, Democrats should be the ones complaining.
Because there was no recount as she requested due to lack of explicit intent.Damage was not shown. She didn't prove any votes were not counted.
Being an analyst goes down the drain when the system fails.The message board is about everybody's opinion. I so happen to have both experience (lead systems analyst for both municipal and corporate elections back when I was 27 and 29) and mental capacity to form my own opinion. Other poor souls are simply left to echo the trash they see in the Pundit and such. The bull about any felony in the OP's linked article is a hoot.
It may carry 0 weight to you now, but hopefully as you mature a light of understanding will come on for you.