Keep This Guy Away From the White House

[M14 Shooter]

You live in Chicago?

If you can tell me why your question, with regard to what I said, is relevant, I'll answer it.

 

[citygator]

If you can tell me why your question, with regard to what I said, is relevant, I'll answer it.

You seem really focused on Chicago so I was curious if you live there. I suspect you don’t and that whatever red state you likely live in or revere is somewhere near the bottom of the safest states to live in. I’m just curious if your backyard is in order.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You seem really focused on Chicago so I was curious if you live there. I suspect you don’t and that whatever red state you likely live in or revere is somewhere near the bottom of the safest states to live in. I’m just curious if your backyard is in order.

As I suspected - your question has no bearing on what I said; you know you cannot meaningfully address what I said, so you deceided to try to make the issue about me.

Where I live does not matter -- my statements stand.

 

[citygator]

As I suspected - your question has no bearing on what I said; you know you cannot meaningfully address what I said, so you deceided to try to make the issue about me.

Where I live does not matter -- my statements stand.

Shows you’re a hypocrite. How many deaths in your state? Was it too many? That has direct bearing cuz if you can’t answer why should anyone else.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Shows you’re a hypocrite.

Still trying to make the discussion about me?


Trump believes:

-There's too much violent crime in the inner cities
-695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is too many
-We can't just let this go on

Why do you disagree?

 

[citygator]

Still trying to make the discussion about me?


Trump believes:

-There's too much violent crime in the inner cities
-695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is too many
-We can't just let this go on

Why do you disagree?

There is too much violence in America. The places we need to address are the high crime poverty stricken red states. They have 43% more crime per person. A few major cities have issues too but most large cities have half the crime rate of the 1990’s. How about you address the real problems and not just jump on a partisan bandwagon ignorantly?

 

[M14 Shooter]

There is too much violence in America. The places we need to address are the high crime poverty stricken red states. They have 43% more crime per person. A few major cities have issues too but most large cities have half the crime rate of the 1990’s.

Sounds like you agree with Trump - and you're willing to admit it.
Good for you .

 

[citygator]

Sounds like you agree withg Trump.
Good for you .

What part? Sending in federal troops which is what this thread is about? Uh, screw that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What part?

Obviously...

-There's too much violent crime in the inner cities
-695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is too many
-We can't just let this go on

As I said: Good for you.
In this instance, you did not allow your partisanship to get in the way agreeing with the truth

Sending in federal troops...

You agree violent crime is too high.
You agree something must be done about it.
If the state and local governments aren't willing or able to do something about it -- if the state and local governmts are unwilling or unable to enforce the laws and protect the rights of their poeple - why do you believe the Feds should not step in?

 

[BackAgain]

Clearly not.

Wrong. Trump was vastly superior to Potato. And hopefully will be yet again.

 

[Lesh]

Obviously...

-There's too much violent crime in the inner cities
-695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is too many
-We can't just let this go on

As I said: Good for you.
In this instance, you did not allow your partisanship to get in the way agreeing with the truth


You agree violent crime is too high.
You agree something must be done about it.
If the state and local governments aren't willing or able to do something about it -- if the state and local governmts are unwilling or unable to enforce the laws and protect the rights of their poeple - why do you believe the Feds should not step in?

Sending in Federal troops is NOT the answer to your perceived high crime problems.

It’s a recipe for fascism

 

[M14 Shooter]

Sending in Federal troops is NOT the answer to your perceived high crime problems.

"Perceived?
So you DO believe:

- There's NOT too much violent crime in the inner cities
- 695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is NOT too many
- We CAN just let this go on

Interesting..

 

[citygator]

Obviously...

-There's too much violent crime in the inner cities
-695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is too many
-We can't just let this go on

As I said: Good for you.
In this instance, you did not allow your partisanship to get in the way agreeing with the truth


You agree violent crime is too high.
You agree something must be done about it.
If the state and local governments aren't willing or able to do something about it -- if the state and local governmts are unwilling or unable to enforce the laws and protect the rights of their poeple - why do you believe the Feds should not step in?

Cuz its illegal. We dont use federal troops to police citizens. Ever. That is a local function of a civil organization. Basically he is calling for Marshall Law which should scare the crap out of any big government hating republican but since it is said by a republican you dont care. How easy you give up your freedom for pleasure.

“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”
― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Wrong. Trump was vastly superior to Potato. And hopefully will be yet again.

Clearly not.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Cuz its illegal. We dont use federal troops to police citizens. Ever.

This does not explain your opposition to the federal government stepping in, just your opposition to the means Trump said he would use.
So, again:
If the state and local governments are unwilling or unable to enforce the laws and protect the rights of their people - why do you believe the Feds should not step in?

Beyond that - It's not.

Insurrection Act of 1807 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Note that this is a specified exception to the posse comitatus act.

The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard:

• when requested by a state's legislature, or governor if the legislature cannot be convened, to address an insurrection against that state (§ 251),
• to address an insurrection, in any state, which makes it impracticable to enforce the law (§ 252), or
• to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of constitutionally secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights (§ 253).

That is a local function of a civil organization.

And when the state and local government refuse to protect the rights of their people, the federal government has the authority to step in.
See above.

 

[BackAgain]

Clearly not.

Wrong again. But it is Stumbling Dumbledick talking.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yep....he said to fight crime.
We can't have anyone fighting crime in Blue Cities.
That's the primary excuse that Pelosi gave when she cut back on security on Jan 6th.

Nobody said anything like that. What bizarre lies you tell.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Clearly not.

Biden will beat him like a drum again, of course.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Perceived?
So you DO believe:

- There's NOT too much violent crime in the inner cities
- 695 deaths in Chicago, 2022, is NOT too many
- We CAN just let this go on

Interesting..

He didn't say there was no problem. He said that isn't the correct solution. Try to follow.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This does not explain your opposition to the federal government stepping in, just your opposition to the means Trump said he would use.

Which was his objection. You quoted it.