playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 57,141
- 50,206
- 3,645
She laid a glove on herself with the woman question. I don’t think she can be objective because of her track record. Based on your logic and correlation of race and the ability to be objective, you must think Clarence Thomas is objective without looking at his record.
she answered correctly given the scope of the question asked. she was asked a question re: biology.
she rightfully answered that she is not a biologist. BUT, she did TRY to include some context in that - had a legal case re: the legal definition of 'woman' had come b4 her to decide ... then she would have had to listen to arguments & go from there.