CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,661
- 69,797
- 2,330
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's rational, you're not. Go figure.Your garbage thread drew me in cause you posted a flamatory thread and as usual the bullshit mods didn't call you on it. But I will.
FUCK YOU LOSER
Drink, drank, drunk once again. Whose the loser?
![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
The Koch brothers were at oldest, 18 and 13 respectively at the time of Stalin's death. I doubt very seriously they were able to modernize Stalin's anything prior to his demise when they were that young.![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
Eisenhower's policy was one of "strength and civility," and his approach was to remain militarily strong but civil. "You would never find Dwight Eisenhower speaking disparagingly or in a threatening way to the Soviet people. He had a deep feeling for what they had endured during the war and for their tremendously important role in bringing the war to a successful conclusion." The Death of Stalin (March, 1953)
![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
He's rational, you're not. Go figure.
If I'm not rational, how might I be able to "go figure"?
Why do you go out of your way to be perceived as stupid? Is it that you don't care that a constant service of ad hominem attacks are generally perceived as the product of someone incapable of rational and intelligent comment?
You accusing others of "ad hominem" attacks is pretty ironic.
The real "cockroaches" are the liberals. They scurry when the light of truth is shone on them!
Supporting a person's campaign isn't "buying" the government.
Do you have any evidence that people are being bought?
Just because people agree on issues doesn't mean they are being bought.
Do you liberals think the Koch bros. should support people in the democrat party who would vote against their interests?
The evidence of politicians being bought off is the millions being put in campaigns for decades. Big money wouldn't be doing this if it didn't pay off.
The real "cockroaches" are the liberals. They scurry when the light of truth is shone on them!
Another 'brilliant' post by a non liberal (or should I write, liberal hater?). As one who knows the truth, would you please share it with us and in the process how you identify yourself. Are you a "conservative", a "neo fascist", a "Republican", an "Iconoclast" or simply a "curmudgeon"?
The real "cockroaches" are the liberals. They scurry when the light of truth is shone on them!
Another 'brilliant' post by a non liberal (or should I write, liberal hater?). As one who knows the truth, would you please share it with us and in the process how you identify yourself. Are you a "conservative", a "neo fascist", a "Republican", an "Iconoclast" or simply a "curmudgeon"?
I doubt I could explain the truth to you as you would be incapable of understanding.
I am a Conservative Republican, but I'm a bit liberal with abortion and homosexuals.
![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
Well if the larger oil companies had not sued Fred Koch, he would have never of had to go overseas.
In 1927, Koch developed a more efficient thermal cracking process for turning crude oil into gasoline which allowed smaller players in the industry to better compete with the oil majors. The larger oil companies quickly sued in response, filing 44 different lawsuits against Koch, and embroiling him in litigation for years. Koch was to prevail in all but one of the suits (which was later over-turned due to the fact that the judge had been bribed).
This extended litigation effectively put Winkler-Koch out of business in the U.S. for several years. Koch turned his focus to foreign markets, including the Soviet Union, where Winkler-Koch built 15 cracking units between 1929 and 1932. The company also built installations in countries throughout Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
Fred C. Koch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some good came out of it. Fred Koch got to see what Communism was all about and helped him to recognize it here in the U.S.A.
![]()
The OP's Founding Fathers
Away with Kulaks!
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
Stalin was FDR's main man! OMG What do you have against FDR?
You being the board's leading 'scholar' on Commies and conspiracies, how do you feel about the Koch's fortune originating with modernizing Stalin's refining industry?
It might be interesting to read your handwaves and excuses for such long time 'libertoon' financiers. Then again, maybe not ...
Well if the larger oil companies had not sued Fred Koch, he would have never of had to go overseas.
In 1927, Koch developed a more efficient thermal cracking process for turning crude oil into gasoline which allowed smaller players in the industry to better compete with the oil majors. The larger oil companies quickly sued in response, filing 44 different lawsuits against Koch, and embroiling him in litigation for years. Koch was to prevail in all but one of the suits (which was later over-turned due to the fact that the judge had been bribed).
This extended litigation effectively put Winkler-Koch out of business in the U.S. for several years. Koch turned his focus to foreign markets, including the Soviet Union, where Winkler-Koch built 15 cracking units between 1929 and 1932. The company also built installations in countries throughout Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
Fred C. Koch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some good came out of it. Fred Koch got to see what Communism was all about and helped him to recognize it here in the U.S.A.
Yes, they aren't the first 'free market' types to have failed competing with others and moved on to less 'free markets' to make money, in this case from a vicious dictator, and later in pipelines, which hire out governments to use imminent domain laws to keep from having to pay 'free market' prices for the land they push their pipelines over, that sort of 'free market' stuff.