Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[Bob Blaylock]

But Rittenhouse fires a gun into a crowd, kills multiple people and walks? That's absurd.

It's quite an impressive trick that he did, firing recklessly into a crowd of peaceful, honest, decent protesters, and the only ones he actually hit were three pieces of subhuman criminal shit.

 

[JoeB131]

Witness testimony identified Rosenbaum trying to grab the rifle held by Rittehouse. You can continue screeching your conspiracy theories but the jury has decided.

Conspiracies are done in secret... Judge Senile botched that case right in the open.

Trial by headline, the latest rage! No need for attorneys, no need for expensive court rooms with all that security. Not even a need for all that following the law nonsense.

Well, let's look at that (and taking you off ignore for a second.)

This case came down to what Rittenhouse's intent was.

Was he just some sweet kid who was concerned about cleaning up graffiti,

Or was he a racist douchebag who went somewhere he thought he could shoot him some darkies?

Well, the Media, bless them, found plenty of evidence that the latter was the case. His paling around with the Proud Boys, his videotape of him wishing he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS.

Unfortunately, the jury never heard about it.

 

[JoeB131]

It's quite an impressive trick that he did, firing recklessly into a crowd of peaceful, honest, decent protesters, and the only ones he actually hit were three pieces of subhuman criminal shit.

He didn't fire into a crowd of Mormons, did he?

 

[Billo_Really]

Remember, unzip FIRST.

I knew I was forgetting something!

 

[Hollie]

Conspiracies are done in secret... Judge Senile botched that case right in the open.



Well, let's look at that (and taking you off ignore for a second.)

This case came down to what Rittenhouse's intent was.

Was he just some sweet kid who was concerned about cleaning up graffiti,

Or was he a racist douchebag who went somewhere he thought he could shoot him some darkies?

Well, the Media, bless them, found plenty of evidence that the latter was the case. His paling around with the Proud Boys, his videotape of him wishing he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS.

Unfortunately, the jury never heard about it.

The case came down to Rittenhouse defending himself from attackers. The case came down to the specific acts of he being attacked and the measures he took to defend himself.

You’re inventing a case Rittenhouse was not of trial for. It’s important to know the facts and not invent scenarios that might appeal to your emotions but were not a part of the trial.

The media, bless them, falsified events and took it upon themselves to prejudice the trial. It’s what the leftist media does. The whole “peaceful demonstration” narrative was a farce.

You litter so many of your posts with Rittenhouse having claimed associations with Proud Boys, yet, that had nothing to do with the events surrounding him being attacked by social misfits.

Deal with facts.

 

[hadit]

Well, let's look at that (and taking you off ignore for a second.)

This case came down to what Rittenhouse's intent was.

Was he just some sweet kid who was concerned about cleaning up graffiti,

Or was he a racist douchebag who went somewhere he thought he could shoot him some darkies?

Well, the Media, bless them, found plenty of evidence that the latter was the case. His paling around with the Proud Boys, his videotape of him wishing he could shoot a black man running out of a CVS.

Unfortunately, the jury never heard about it.

Actually, no, that's only in your mind. Here's reality. The case was decided on his actions, and the jury decided after viewing the video recordings and hearing all the testimony that his actions met the standard for self-defense. They took into account what the people on the videos said and did prior to him shooting them because they were far more important than anything he might have said before the incident about people who were not even involved. His purpose for being there simply wasn't germane to the case, nor was the purpose for the demonstrators to be there. The only things that mattered were the actions of the people involved, and the fact that you think other stuff should have been included is irrelevant.

See, having those actions recorded and viewable by the jury sealed the deal and made it impossible for the prosecution to spin it into anything other than self-defense. Any claim that he wanted to shoot a black man running out of a CVS doesn't apply to the case because he simply didn't shoot or attempt to shoot any black people that night. If he had, it could have been introduced in an attempt to make it a hate crime, but he didn't, so it wasn't. Did you not see where the early reports that it was a racial shooting were debunked and had to disappear when the truth came out? You've been claiming for a long time this was a racial shooting, but the white guy on trial only shot other white people. That is why you are in the minority on this case and people keep telling you that you're wrong and making stuff up.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Okay, so you can't back up your claim.

I allready did

You did not

 

[Soupnazi630]

How right wing of you to think that? How come you fuckers always admire pieces of shit? I mean, there's this prick; and there's that POS George Zimmerman; Dylan Roof, etc. You fuckers always put Assholes on Pedastals!

It is not thought it is FACT

No one puts Dylan roof on a pedastal moron

I have no thoughts on Zimmerman

but you are a foul and cowardly liar about rittenhouse

Just a coward in general

 

[Soupnazi630]

Well, I'm a chubby adult and, with the amount of beer I drink, I can do my own pissing, thank you.

And a chubby weak bitch

 

[JoeB131]

The case came down to Rittenhouse defending himself from attackers. The case came down to the specific acts of he being attacked and the measures he took to defend himself.

No, it came down to a judge excluding evidence that proved Rittenhouse's intent.

If he was an innocent kid minding his own business, then the argument would have had merit.
It he had been fantasizing for weeks about murdering protestors or minorities, that would have shown premeditation.

The jury never heard about that, though.

You’re inventing a case Rittenhouse was not of trial for. It’s important to know the facts and not invent scenarios that might appeal to your emotions but were not a part of the trial.

The media, bless them, falsified events and took it upon themselves to prejudice the trial. It’s what the leftist media does. The whole “peaceful demonstration” narrative was a farce.

Except the only people killed in the Kenosha Demonstrations were killed by Rittenhouse. So, yeah, they were "peaceful", for the most part.

It's not a matter of "emotion", it is a matter of what his motivations were.

You litter so many of your posts with Rittenhouse having claimed associations with Proud Boys, yet, that had nothing to do with the events surrounding him being attacked by social misfits.

Well, it kind of does. If he was an angry young white man who wanted to make minorities pay for objecting to police brutality, then his motivations do come into play. We've sent people to prison on a lot less evidence than they had on Rittenhouse. How often do you get video of them actually committing the murders?

Actually, no, that's only in your mind. Here's reality.

 

[Hollie]

No, it came down to a judge excluding evidence that proved Rittenhouse's intent.

If he was an innocent kid minding his own business, then the argument would have had merit.
It he had been fantasizing for weeks about murdering protestors or minorities, that would have shown premeditation.

The jury never heard about that, though.



Except the only people killed in the Kenosha Demonstrations were killed by Rittenhouse. So, yeah, they were "peaceful", for the most part.

It's not a matter of "emotion", it is a matter of what his motivations were.



Well, it kind of does. If he was an angry young white man who wanted to make minorities pay for objecting to police brutality, then his motivations do come into play. We've sent people to prison on a lot less evidence than they had on Rittenhouse. How often do you get video of them actually committing the murders?

You have been promoting your "judge excluding evidence" conspiracy theory with most of your rants but you consistently fail to identity the relevant evidence that was excluded.

Your claim that Rittenhouse was an "angry white man" seems like projection on your part. You make no case for the "angry white man" slur aimed at Rittenhouse. It seems your emotional attachment to the self-hating white man syndrome, you know, colors your judgment.

 

[hadit]

It is not thought it is FACT

No one puts Dylan roof on a pedastal moron

I have no thoughts on Zimmerman

but you are a foul and cowardly liar about rittenhouse

Just a coward in general

He's just throwing names, hoping something will stick.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, it came down to a judge excluding evidence that proved Rittenhouse's intent.

If he was an innocent kid minding his own business, then the argument would have had merit.
It he had been fantasizing for weeks about murdering protestors or minorities, that would have shown premeditation.

The jury never heard about that, though.



Except the only people killed in the Kenosha Demonstrations were killed by Rittenhouse. So, yeah, they were "peaceful", for the most part.

It's not a matter of "emotion", it is a matter of what his motivations were.



Well, it kind of does. If he was an angry young white man who wanted to make minorities pay for objecting to police brutality, then his motivations do come into play. We've sent people to prison on a lot less evidence than they had on Rittenhouse. How often do you get video of them actually committing the murders?

All wrong

His intent is irrelevantr when OTHERS attacked HIM. His intent does not make OTHERS attack him. You really are stupid and a liar

There was no excluded evidence. His motives are irrrelevant. He did not attack others.

They were not mostly peaceful they were deliberate riots. There have been many violent riots with no one killed. Your standard is idiotic.

There was no evidence against hiim and anyone sent to prison with no evidence is a political prisoner

Clearly you are a lying trash bag who ewants him locked up ffor his political views.

 

[Flash]

He didn't fire into a crowd of Mormons, did he?

He didn't fire into any crowd. He dispatched the immediate threat on an individual threat basis without any unnecessary casualties to non conmbatants

He should be teaching close combat to US Special Forces troops because he knows how to do it effectively.

 

[hadit]

You have been promoting your "judge excluding evidence" conspiracy theory with most of your rants but you consistently fail to identity the relevant evidence that was excluded.

Your claim that Rittenhouse was an "angry white man" seems like projection on your part. You make no case for the "angry white man" slur aimed at Rittenhouse. It seems your emotional attachment to the self-hating white man syndrome, you know, colors your judgment.

The only "evidence" he thinks was excluded is irrelevant to the case. Even if Joe could PROVE (he's not real big on doing that) that Rittenhouse was the biggest jerk on the planet, even to the extent of wearing white after Labor Day, it doesn't impact what happened that night. The video evidence is clear, Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and the law is not written to protect only those of whom Joe approves.

 

[JoeB131]

You have been promoting your "judge excluding evidence" conspiracy theory with most of your rants but you consistently fail to identity the relevant evidence that was excluded.

Sure I have... you just pretend they don't matter.

Your claim that Rittenhouse was an "angry white man" seems like projection on your part. You make no case for the "angry white man" slur aimed at Rittenhouse. It seems your emotional attachment to the self-hating white man syndrome, you know, colors your judgment.

Fantasizing about shooting black people at the CVS?
Hanging out with the Proud Boys.

 

[Billo_Really]

It is not thought it is FACT

No one puts Dylan roof on a pedastal moron

I have no thoughts on Zimmerman

but you are a foul and cowardly liar about rittenhouse

Just a coward in general

What's up with this bromance you have with Rittenpussy?

 

[JoeB131]

What's up with this bromance you have with Rittenpussy?

He fulfilled all their fantasies... While the rest of them cowered in their homes during the Floyd Riots, Rittenhouse went out and shot him some liberals.

Actually, he shot a hapless homeless man and a couple of innocent bystanders who tried to take him into custody... but you take what you can get when you are an impotent white person mourning the inevitable loss of your power.

 

[Hollie]

Sure I have... you just pretend they don't matter.

Fantasizing about shooting black people at the CVS?
Hanging out with the Proud Boys.

You pretend your tender sensibilities are relevant in legal matters. You may be surprised to learn that your feelings about how the legal system should abide by your prejudices and “… because I say so” whining is met with ridicule.

Your fantasies about Rittenhouse are your own to deal with.

You may wish to email BLM and see if they will join you in Peaceful Protest Looting and Burning™ at the Kenosha courthouse.

Otherwise, it’s buffoonish to insist that the legal system surrounding the Rittenhouse verdict was in any way flawed because irrelevancies you insist should have been a part of the trial were (rightly) ignored.

 

[Billo_Really]

He fulfilled all their fantasies... While the rest of them cowered in their homes during the Floyd Riots, Rittenhouse went out and shot him some liberals.

Actually, he shot a hapless homeless man and a couple of innocent bystanders who tried to take him into custody... but you take what you can get when you are an impotent white person mourning the inevitable loss of your power.

I get it, you're both fuckin' redneck racists!