Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[Soupnazi630]

ACtually, Bernie Goetz was a case of jury nullification, not evidence.

And a few years later, the young man he crippled won a 43 million dollar judgement.

So this isn't a good example.

It was a case of evidence.

That judgement was injustice.

Goetz murdered no one and neither did rittenhouse.

 

[JoeB131]

It was a case of evidence.

That judgement was injustice.

Goetz murdered no one and neither did rittenhouse.

Goetz didn't murder anyone because no one he shot died.

One man was crippled for life and got a 43 million dollar judgement, though.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Goetz didn't murder anyone because no one he shot died.

One man was crippled for life and got a 43 million dollar judgement, though.

That judgement was a perversion of justice just like what they are seeking from rittenhouse.

The hshootings were justified in both cases.

 

[Hollie]

Okay, Honey, he didn't "go vigilante" by dressing up as a bat and beating up criminals, he went out with a military grade weapon and shot people.

Not sure how you do that without murdering people.

The AR-15 is not a military grade weapon. Military grade weapons would be weapons used by the military.

Your day job involving dressing up in fat suits is really not appropriate in this thread, OK pumpkin?

You're still promoting your fanciful, ''murdering people'' conspiracy theory but you continually fail to identify a murder conviction for Rittenhouse.

 

[JoeB131]

The AR-15 is not a military grade weapon. Military grade weapons would be weapons used by the military.

The AR-15 was developed for the military as the M-16. Are you really this piss ignorant?

 

[Hollie]

The AR-15 was developed for the military as the M-16. Are you really this piss ignorant?

The civilian Armalite Rifle is not a military grade weapon any more than a shotgun is a military grade weapon. A common fixed blade hunting knife is no more a military grade weapon vs. a bayonet.

Stop being so piss poor ignorant.

 

[JoeB131]

The civilian Armalite Rifle is not a military grade weapon any more than a shotgun is a military grade weapon. A common fixed blade hunting knife is no more a military grade weapon vs. a bayonet.

The AR-15 was specifically designed for the military and was adopted as the M16. I mean, I know you guys like to pretend it wasn't when they prevented it from going full auto (Something you can fix with a simple file). But it was designed for a battlefield.

 

[Hollie]

The AR-15 was specifically designed for the military and was adopted as the M16. I mean, I know you guys like to pretend it wasn't when they prevented it from going full auto (Something you can fix with a simple file). But it was designed for a battlefield.

The Armalite Rifle is not, as you noted, an M-16. Nicely done refuting your own weak attempt at argument. I know you know-nothings like to compare the civilian semi-automatic AR-15 to a full auto capable M-16 but the differences in the two rifles are glaringly obvious... except to know-nothings.

 

[JoeB131]

The Armalite Rifle is not, as you noted, an M-16. Nicely done refuting your own weak attempt at argument. I know you know-nothings like to compare the civilian semi-automatic AR-15 to a full auto capable M-16 but the differences in the two rifles are glaringly obvious... except to know-nothings.

I carried an M16A1 for 11 years. Some of the older ones were still marked "AR-15".

The point was, it was designed to military specifications, of which full auto fire was only one. Others were the use of 5.56MM ammo, allowing a soldier to carry more rounds on long patrols, the range of 420 meters (no reason a civilian would need to fire that far), etc. The inclusion of a bayonet clip. Again, no reason a civilian rifle should have a bayonet clip.

It's a military weapon.

 

[hadit]

Hey, that's one way to get Justice.

No, that's just pathetic.

He expressed a desire to go vigilante and kill people.
He went out and killed people.

How is this NOT relevant.

Because he didn't shoot anyone that was not attacking him or threatening his life. In order for your fantasy to have merit, he would have had to started shooting random people who were no threat to him, most likely from concealment. He would have tried to hide his identify from the police, knowing that his actions would get him in a lot of trouble. IOW, he would have planned it all out ahead of time. The last thing someone like that would want is to be face to face with people who could fight back.

The facts of the case just don't fit your narrative. That's why you have to resort to inventing this massive conspiracy where everyone is in on it, from the lawyers to the judge to the jury and a few dog catchers.

 

[Hollie]

I carried an M16A1 for 11 years. Some of the older ones were still marked "AR-15".

The point was, it was designed to military specifications, of which full auto fire was only one. Others were the use of 5.56MM ammo, allowing a soldier to carry more rounds on long patrols, the range of 420 meters (no reason a civilian would need to fire that far), etc. The inclusion of a bayonet clip. Again, no reason a civilian rifle should have a bayonet clip.

It's a military weapon.

I have no reason to accept your claim of carrying a M16. In view of your history of invented tales and fables, you're just not to be trusted.

It's comical when you use the term "military grade" weapon. What is "military grade" about the AR-15? What does "mitary grade" actually mean?

Can we assume a 12 gauge sporting clay shotgun is "military grade" because a 12 gauge shotgun is used by the military? Why is the common Remington 700 bolt gun not a "military grade" weapon when a similar rifle is used by the military?

You use silly labels typically used by leftist hack politicians who know nothing of firearms. You're just parroting slogans you read on CNN.

The AR-15 is not used by the military, thus not a military weapon.

 

[JoeB131]

Because he didn't shoot anyone that was not attacking him

Attacking him after HE instigated the incident. Particularly the last two, who were only "attacking" him because he just gunned a man down and were trying to hold him for police.

In order for your fantasy to have merit, he would have had to started shooting random people who were no threat to him,

He did shoot people who were no threat to him. He travelled 22 miles to find them after wishing he could gun them down.

He would have tried to hide his identify from the police, knowing that his actions would get him in a lot of trouble. IOW, he would have planned it all out ahead of time. The last thing someone like that would want is to be face to face with people who could fight back.

He could have easily turned himself in to Police. Instead he ran back to Antioch, until his mommy's lawyer told him he had to turn himself in.

The facts of the case just don't fit your narrative.

If the facts were clear, then why did Judge Senile suppress evidence like his association with the Proud Boys or his wistfully wanting to shoot a black man at the CVS? Seems to me that the people inventing a narrative is your side... and you don't like the bits that don't fit it.

 

[JoeB131]

It's comical when you use the term "military grade" weapon. What is "military grade" about the AR-15? What does "mitary grade" actually mean?

Uh, I just gave you a fucking list of the military specifications that were required in it's development Sweet evil Jesus, are you dense.

 

[Hollie]

Uh, I just gave you a fucking list of the military specifications that were required in it's development Sweet evil Jesus, are you dense.

Uh, the .308 round is no more military spec than the 12 gauge shotgun.

Sweet lord Brian Stelter but your CNN slogans are tiresome.

 

[hadit]

Attacking him after HE instigated the incident. Particularly the last two, who were only "attacking" him because he just gunned a man down and were trying to hold him for police.

Which doesn't negate self-defense since he was fleeing the scene. Had they succeeded in killing Rittenhouse, they themselves would have been on trial for murder.

As we see in California, you don't have the universal right to attempt killing a person who is fleeing and no threat to you. As in that case and this one, we see that attempting to stop an armed person who is leaving the scene is a foolish thing to do.

He did shoot people who were no threat to him. He travelled 22 miles to find them after wishing he could gun them down.

Incorrect. As shown on the video and in court testimony, they were certainly a threat to him. And you can't prove he wanted to gun them down.

He could have easily turned himself in to Police. Instead he ran back to Antioch, until his mommy's lawyer told him he had to turn himself in.

Smart. He made no attempt to hide, just wisely consulted with his attorney and followed his advice. And, since you didn't follow the case, he DID go to the police with his hands up. How they handled it was not up to him, he did what he was supposed to do, which is NOT the way he would have done it had he intended to hunt down and kill people that night.

If the facts were clear, then why did Judge Senile suppress evidence like his association with the Proud Boys or his wistfully wanting to shoot a black man at the CVS? Seems to me that the people inventing a narrative is your side... and you don't like the bits that don't fit it.

You haven't proven that was his voice, and again for the 500th time, he shot no black people that night. That's one BIG reason why that video was not entered as "evidence", because it's not. It's very easy to fake a video like that, and apparently very easy to get gullible people to eat it up like it's a ham sammich.

The bottom line is, when it comes to convicting someone of murder, you have to PROVE they actually murdered someone, you can't just read a few headlines and hand down a guilty verdict. Your feelz do NOT trump true evidence.

 

[Flash]

The AR-15 was developed for the military as the M-16. Are you really this piss ignorant?

LOL! You are still at it today with your filthy ass hate Kyle bullshit.

Get a life a kid. All that hate is going to burn you up.

By the way Moon Bat. No military in the world uses an AR-15.

 

[playtime]

Not a guy I’d trust being around if I was unarmed. He’s a murderer in my mind, acquitted or not.,

who are you & what have you done with anathema?

 

[JoeB131]

Which doesn't negate self-defense since he was fleeing the scene. Had they succeeded in killing Rittenhouse, they themselves would have been on trial for murder.

Actually, if Grosskuertz shot the pudgy little bastard, you gun nuts would be praising him as a good guy with a gun who stopped an active shooter.

 

[hadit]

Actually, if Grosskuertz shot the pudgy little bastard, you gun nuts would be praising him as a good guy with a gun who stopped an active shooter.

That's both unknowable and irrelevant. However, since he fired the one shot and fled, shooting him would not be indicated. Only if he remained, shooting into the crowd at people not endangering him, would it be a live shooter situation where someone would be justified in stopping him.

See, this is where the facts and details again derail your fantasy. Only when you substitute your version of what happened for what really happened can you justify it.

 

[JoeB131]

hat's both unknowable