Laura Ingraham gives insincere apology after mocking shooting survivors AFTER ads pulled.

[deanrd]

You know Republicans are batsh!t crazy when they fight for the right of murderers to kill their children.

 

[protectionist]

I know Republicans don't like children. But what about their own children? Why have them if you don't care about them?

Have you ever considered seeing a psychiatrist ?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

First of all, you don't have to riot and burn to be irresponsible and unprincipled. What he said was untrue and insulting. Secondly, if my kid used that much profanity in an interview, I'd yank him out of there by his shorthairs and wash his mouth out with Remington gun oil. Thirdly, people keep bringing up the fact that he's just a kid. On the one hand, everyone's creaming their liberal jeans and saying "Look at these high school kids getting out there and making a statement and taking a stand on the issue", and on the other hand, when they're criticized it's "But they're just high school kids!".

You can't have it both ways. And being a high school kid does not justify making those kinds of presumptuous and insulting moral judgments of people he doesn't know. I'd have thought his ex FBI father would have taught him better than that.

A couple of things to think about here.

1. We've become a culture that APPLAUDS expletives, and I don't just mean liberals. Conservatives are just as bad. Look at the profanity that came out of Milo Y's mouth - yet he was applauded as a great rightwing speaker. Look at what comes out of our President's mouth - a President elected by the CONSERVATIVES. So excuse me if I'm just a wee bit cynical about the sudden horror and palpitations when a teenager uses expletives. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

You're right, there's probably a little too much profanity out there. But the thing is, Milo and Trump are both adults. Look, his profanity doesn't bother me at all so there's no "horror and palpitations" from this quarter. I point it out because, well, he is a kid as everyone keeps pointing out, and when I see him talk like that and insulting people the way he does, I'm just not moved by his rhetoric. He doesn't come across to me as a conscientious social warrior, he just comes across as a foul-mouthed pissed off kid.

2. The left (justifiably) got a lot of crap over anti-Trump demonstrations and Antifa's violence (even though we didn't largely support it). Fine. Now we have young people utilizing our rights - the right to petition the government. The right to demonstrate. And it's civil. But oh no. That's bad too. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

It's great that the demonstrations are civil and it's great that they're exercising their Constitutional rights and personally, I have no problem with that. You and others here keep coming to their defense and telling us what they did not do or did not say. What they do not do or do not say is irrelevant. I'm concerned with what he did say and that was to call these politicians "...pathetic fuckers that want to kill more children." Am I supposed to just dismiss this because he did not kill a puppy yesterday?

Here's my view. He is FAR from unprincipled. He is VERY principled, and he is in pursuit of a very moral cause.

He may or may not be principled, I'm not arguing that he isn't. But what he said was definitely unprincipled.

You just don't happen to agree with it. That's fine. Every cause has many different legitimate views attached to it. The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

Irresponsible? I don't see it. Immature maybe. But that is to be expected. And I'm willing to bet if these kids were marching for arming teachers and concealed carry - you'd be cheering them on.

And you would lose that bet. I've never said anything for or against arming teachers.

 

[protectionist]

The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". .

The left has ALREADY killed kids (and adults,,,,and soldiers...etc) by creating gun-free zones (Parkland, Newtown, San Bernardino, Pulse Club, Fort Hood, Chattanooga, and many more)

And in non-gun-free zones, thousands of people's lives have been saved by good guys with guns (LAX 2002, Garland, TX draw Mohammed contest, Moore, OK beheading, etc etc etc)

 

[MaryAnne11]

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

How many children does Boss Hogg have?

Now that you mention it, both Trump and Roseanne could be children of the Dukes Boss Hogg!

Thanks for that reminder!

 

[MaryAnne11]

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

First of all, you don't have to riot and burn to be irresponsible and unprincipled. What he said was untrue and insulting. Secondly, if my kid used that much profanity in an interview, I'd yank him out of there by his shorthairs and wash his mouth out with Remington gun oil. Thirdly, people keep bringing up the fact that he's just a kid. On the one hand, everyone's creaming their liberal jeans and saying "Look at these high school kids getting out there and making a statement and taking a stand on the issue", and on the other hand, when they're criticized it's "But they're just high school kids!".

You can't have it both ways. And being a high school kid does not justify making those kinds of presumptuous and insulting moral judgments of people he doesn't know. I'd have thought his ex FBI father would have taught him better than that.

A couple of things to think about here.

1. We've become a culture that APPLAUDS expletives, and I don't just mean liberals. Conservatives are just as bad. Look at the profanity that came out of Milo Y's mouth - yet he was applauded as a great rightwing speaker. Look at what comes out of our President's mouth - a President elected by the CONSERVATIVES. So excuse me if I'm just a wee bit cynical about the sudden horror and palpitations when a teenager uses expletives. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

You're right, there's probably a little too much profanity out there. But the thing is, Milo and Trump are both adults. Look, his profanity doesn't bother me at all so there's no "horror and palpitations" from this quarter. I point it out because, well, he is a kid as everyone keeps pointing out, and when I see him talk like that and insulting people the way he does, I'm just not moved by his rhetoric. He doesn't come across to me as a conscientious social warrior, he just comes across as a foul-mouthed pissed off kid.

2. The left (justifiably) got a lot of crap over anti-Trump demonstrations and Antifa's violence (even though we didn't largely support it). Fine. Now we have young people utilizing our rights - the right to petition the government. The right to demonstrate. And it's civil. But oh no. That's bad too. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

It's great that the demonstrations are civil and it's great that they're exercising their Constitutional rights and personally, I have no problem with that. You and others here keep coming to their defense and telling us what they did not do or did not say. What they do not do or do not say is irrelevant. I'm concerned with what he did say and that was to call these politicians "...pathetic fuckers that want to kill more children." Am I supposed to just dismiss this because he did not kill a puppy yesterday?

Here's my view. He is FAR from unprincipled. He is VERY principled, and he is in pursuit of a very moral cause.

He may or may not be principled, I'm not arguing that he isn't. But what he said was definitely unprincipled.

You just don't happen to agree with it. That's fine. Every cause has many different legitimate views attached to it. The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

Irresponsible? I don't see it. Immature maybe. But that is to be expected. And I'm willing to bet if these kids were marching for arming teachers and concealed carry - you'd be cheering them on.

And you would lose that bet. I've never said anything for or against arming teachers.

You think it is fine for a 70 year old to be fowl mouthed, crude and call people names that a 6 year old would use. But find it crude in a 17 year old?

 

[MaryAnne11]

Hitler lost because the US MILITARY!ENGLISH AND STALIN’s Russia combined to go across Europe to defeat him.MY Dad was an Engineer who built bridges for the Military.

The man who later became my Husband was an 18 year old,wounded on Omaha Normandy Beach who ,with his fellow MP’s marched across Germany to liberate the Germans and the Concentration Camps

And you are trying to tell me what Hitler did? His Elite were a bunch of thugs much like what we have in Governent now!

But we will win this one,too.

And those young people you dislike will lead the way!

If Hitler waited 10 months to invade Russia it’s unlikely the US would have gotten involved so quickly on the Eastern front.
But that remains an unanswered question of Hitler’s mistake.

The US went to war in Europe to help England.

They went to war against Japan because they attacked us at Pearl Harbor.

I listened to FDR give his speech. Look it up sometime.

The US involvement on the Eastern Front was definitely spurred by FDR allowing Japan to attack Pearl Harbor by surprise.
If Hitler attacked in very early Spring, though, it would have been a much sketchier and bloody outcome.
It’s a good thing many Germans froze to death in the Russian winter.

That post is a bare faced lie!

Then we better start editing history books.

History has already been edited by every dipstick that tells a story because they think it happened that way.

I watched it happen in real life. Funny thing the Japanese have gone from Americans seeing the atrocities they did in the war to poor,misunderstood people.

 

[Dale Smith]

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

First of all, you don't have to riot and burn to be irresponsible and unprincipled. What he said was untrue and insulting. Secondly, if my kid used that much profanity in an interview, I'd yank him out of there by his shorthairs and wash his mouth out with Remington gun oil. Thirdly, people keep bringing up the fact that he's just a kid. On the one hand, everyone's creaming their liberal jeans and saying "Look at these high school kids getting out there and making a statement and taking a stand on the issue", and on the other hand, when they're criticized it's "But they're just high school kids!".

You can't have it both ways. And being a high school kid does not justify making those kinds of presumptuous and insulting moral judgments of people he doesn't know. I'd have thought his ex FBI father would have taught him better than that.

A couple of things to think about here.

1. We've become a culture that APPLAUDS expletives, and I don't just mean liberals. Conservatives are just as bad. Look at the profanity that came out of Milo Y's mouth - yet he was applauded as a great rightwing speaker. Look at what comes out of our President's mouth - a President elected by the CONSERVATIVES. So excuse me if I'm just a wee bit cynical about the sudden horror and palpitations when a teenager uses expletives. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

You're right, there's probably a little too much profanity out there. But the thing is, Milo and Trump are both adults. Look, his profanity doesn't bother me at all so there's no "horror and palpitations" from this quarter. I point it out because, well, he is a kid as everyone keeps pointing out, and when I see him talk like that and insulting people the way he does, I'm just not moved by his rhetoric. He doesn't come across to me as a conscientious social warrior, he just comes across as a foul-mouthed pissed off kid.

2. The left (justifiably) got a lot of crap over anti-Trump demonstrations and Antifa's violence (even though we didn't largely support it). Fine. Now we have young people utilizing our rights - the right to petition the government. The right to demonstrate. And it's civil. But oh no. That's bad too. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

It's great that the demonstrations are civil and it's great that they're exercising their Constitutional rights and personally, I have no problem with that. You and others here keep coming to their defense and telling us what they did not do or did not say. What they do not do or do not say is irrelevant. I'm concerned with what he did say and that was to call these politicians "...pathetic fuckers that want to kill more children." Am I supposed to just dismiss this because he did not kill a puppy yesterday?

Here's my view. He is FAR from unprincipled. He is VERY principled, and he is in pursuit of a very moral cause.

He may or may not be principled, I'm not arguing that he isn't. But what he said was definitely unprincipled.

You just don't happen to agree with it. That's fine. Every cause has many different legitimate views attached to it. The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

Irresponsible? I don't see it. Immature maybe. But that is to be expected. And I'm willing to bet if these kids were marching for arming teachers and concealed carry - you'd be cheering them on.

And you would lose that bet. I've never said anything for or against arming teachers.

You think it is fine for a 70 year old to be fowl mouthed, crude and call people names that a 6 year old would use. But find it crude in a 17 year old?

You are an idiot........"fowl" versus "foul", ya dumb ass bitch........

 

[MaryAnne11]

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

First of all, you don't have to riot and burn to be irresponsible and unprincipled. What he said was untrue and insulting. Secondly, if my kid used that much profanity in an interview, I'd yank him out of there by his shorthairs and wash his mouth out with Remington gun oil. Thirdly, people keep bringing up the fact that he's just a kid. On the one hand, everyone's creaming their liberal jeans and saying "Look at these high school kids getting out there and making a statement and taking a stand on the issue", and on the other hand, when they're criticized it's "But they're just high school kids!".

You can't have it both ways. And being a high school kid does not justify making those kinds of presumptuous and insulting moral judgments of people he doesn't know. I'd have thought his ex FBI father would have taught him better than that.

A couple of things to think about here.

1. We've become a culture that APPLAUDS expletives, and I don't just mean liberals. Conservatives are just as bad. Look at the profanity that came out of Milo Y's mouth - yet he was applauded as a great rightwing speaker. Look at what comes out of our President's mouth - a President elected by the CONSERVATIVES. So excuse me if I'm just a wee bit cynical about the sudden horror and palpitations when a teenager uses expletives. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

You're right, there's probably a little too much profanity out there. But the thing is, Milo and Trump are both adults. Look, his profanity doesn't bother me at all so there's no "horror and palpitations" from this quarter. I point it out because, well, he is a kid as everyone keeps pointing out, and when I see him talk like that and insulting people the way he does, I'm just not moved by his rhetoric. He doesn't come across to me as a conscientious social warrior, he just comes across as a foul-mouthed pissed off kid.

2. The left (justifiably) got a lot of crap over anti-Trump demonstrations and Antifa's violence (even though we didn't largely support it). Fine. Now we have young people utilizing our rights - the right to petition the government. The right to demonstrate. And it's civil. But oh no. That's bad too. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

It's great that the demonstrations are civil and it's great that they're exercising their Constitutional rights and personally, I have no problem with that. You and others here keep coming to their defense and telling us what they did not do or did not say. What they do not do or do not say is irrelevant. I'm concerned with what he did say and that was to call these politicians "...pathetic fuckers that want to kill more children." Am I supposed to just dismiss this because he did not kill a puppy yesterday?

Here's my view. He is FAR from unprincipled. He is VERY principled, and he is in pursuit of a very moral cause.

He may or may not be principled, I'm not arguing that he isn't. But what he said was definitely unprincipled.

You just don't happen to agree with it. That's fine. Every cause has many different legitimate views attached to it. The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

Irresponsible? I don't see it. Immature maybe. But that is to be expected. And I'm willing to bet if these kids were marching for arming teachers and concealed carry - you'd be cheering them on.

And you would lose that bet. I've never said anything for or against arming teachers.

You think it is fine for a 70 year old to be fowl mouthed, crude and call people names that a 6 year old would use. But find it crude in a 17 year old?

You are an idiot........"fowl" versus "foul", ya dumb ass bitch........

Thanks,you are such a gentleman! Figures you are a Trump supporter.

Now go wash your mouth out with soap you loud mouthed blow hard!

 

[IsaacNewton]

Now Laura Ingraham is taking a 'scheduled vacation'. They put that word 'scheduled' in there so it didn't look like she got her ass whipped entirely by a 17 year old. But she and Fake Fox News are tucking their tail between their legs and slithering off to try to hide in the bushes as more advertisers pull their ads from her show.

Bitch - slapped

 

[mudwhistle]

Yep....and anyone who attacks Trump is as big an asshole.

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

Yeah.....now he's going after Arby's because they won't drop their ads on Laura Ingraham's show.
Totally innocent.
You don't realize how a big mouth and a multi-billionaire backing the big mouth can destroy lives.

 

[mudwhistle]

Now Laura Ingraham is taking a 'scheduled vacation'. They put that word 'scheduled' in there so it didn't look like she got her ass whipped entirely by a 17 year old. But she and Fake Fox News are tucking their tail between their legs and slithering off to try to hide in the bushes as more advertisers pull their ads from her show.

Bitch - slapped

 

[Trump The Mad King]

Laura Ingraham is a bully, just like all Repugs. You people are evil little fucks and you're all going down.

I think I heard that in 2015.

Good reason. It was true in 2015 also, Nazi boy.

 

[Trump The Mad King]

Now Laura Ingraham is taking a 'scheduled vacation'. They put that word 'scheduled' in there so it didn't look like she got her ass whipped entirely by a 17 year old. But she and Fake Fox News are tucking their tail between their legs and slithering off to try to hide in the bushes as more advertisers pull their ads from her show.

Bitch - slapped

There's nothing to spin, goober. Ingraham is a Repug bully mocking a 17-year-old, and now she is getting her ass kicked by that 17-year-old. Poetic justice.

 

[Trump The Mad King]

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

Yeah.....now he's going after Arby's because they won't drop their ads on Laura Ingraham's show.
Totally innocent.
You don't realize how a big mouth and a multi-billionaire backing the big mouth can destroy lives.

Oh, we do. We definitely know how a big mouth traitor (Donald Trump) and a multi-billionaire backing (extremely wealthy Putin and his billionaire backers) can destroy an entire country (the United States).

 

[mudwhistle]

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

But it is fine for a President to call others all kinds of names, make fun of the disabled.

Nobody said it is, but then again most of the name calling and ridicule seems to be directed at Trump, not originating from him.

Liddle Marco
Rocketman
Crooked Hilary
Lyin' Ted
Low Energy Jeb
Pocohantas
Cryin' Chuck
Flakey Jeff
Liddle Bobby (Corker)
Sloppy Steve Bannon

Really now?

That's about it.
Much of this is in response from insults from the folks you pointed out.
Bob Corker and Jeff Flake spent close to an hour each cussing Trump out on the floor of the Senate without any provocation whatsoever.
Hillary and Obama spied on Trump and launched this fake Russian Collusion scam in an attempt to destroy his presidency.
Hillary said that she has to speak out because she is worried about what a Trump presidency is doing to the planet.
Maxine Waters has been screaming about impeachment since before he took office.
Never mind the constant hateful bloviating from members of the media.
All of the above are guilty of massive amounts of inflammatory rhetoric intended to build a seditious coalition and cause hundreds of thousands to commit violent if not treasonous acts.
And you want to compare this horrendous garbage to a bit of harmless name-calling.
I really think you have zero perspective in all of this.

What Trump critics have done is damage this country and made if extremely difficult for Trump to do what needs to be done.
They are so butt-hurt that they are willing to burn this country to the ground.
That's nothing but utter insanity.

 

[mudwhistle]

Now Laura Ingraham is taking a 'scheduled vacation'. They put that word 'scheduled' in there so it didn't look like she got her ass whipped entirely by a 17 year old. But she and Fake Fox News are tucking their tail between their legs and slithering off to try to hide in the bushes as more advertisers pull their ads from her show.

Bitch - slapped

There's nothing to spin, goober. Ingraham is a Repug bully mocking a 17-year-old, and now she is getting her ass kicked by that 17-year-old. Poetic justice.

Seems to me the media establishment is attempting to bully a political pundit using a snot-nosed brat.
Thems the facts bud.

 

[mudwhistle]

Nope. He's a grown man and a public figure.

Well Camera Hogg is a public figure now, and in Wisconsin he's grown up enough to drive a Combine.

If you think he isn't responsible then maybe he should STFU till he grows up becomes responsible for his conduct.

He is also a kid. It's not about being "responsible". It's about the behavior 0f adults like Ingraham. What does his private information - GPA, college choices - have to do with the stand he's taken?

He and these other kids are acting in a highly responsible and principled way - you just don't happen to agree with their stance.

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

A 17 year old boy bitch-slapped Ingraham and Fake Fox News into retreat.

Pretty smart any way you look it.

Yep....and he did it all by himself with no help from anyone else?

Not hardly.

 

[mudwhistle]

Republicans showing their true colors attacking traumatized children.

But come on, didn't you expect it? Isn't that what Republicans do?

David Hogg has shown zero trauma.
He's tried to cover the story like some pint sized journalist wannabe.

 

[mudwhistle]

Hogg is quoted as saying: "They're pathetic fuckers that want to keep killing our children."

Hardly responsible or principled. And why did he say it? Because these people happen not to agree with his stance.

He is a Highschool kid. Is he rioting? Burning stuff down? Why no. One angry impassioned response and he “isn’t responsible or principled”. People disagree with his stance and will do anything to shred his character because...just possibly they might make a difference?

First of all, you don't have to riot and burn to be irresponsible and unprincipled. What he said was untrue and insulting. Secondly, if my kid used that much profanity in an interview, I'd yank him out of there by his shorthairs and wash his mouth out with Remington gun oil. Thirdly, people keep bringing up the fact that he's just a kid. On the one hand, everyone's creaming their liberal jeans and saying "Look at these high school kids getting out there and making a statement and taking a stand on the issue", and on the other hand, when they're criticized it's "But they're just high school kids!".

You can't have it both ways. And being a high school kid does not justify making those kinds of presumptuous and insulting moral judgments of people he doesn't know. I'd have thought his ex FBI father would have taught him better than that.

A couple of things to think about here.

1. We've become a culture that APPLAUDS expletives, and I don't just mean liberals. Conservatives are just as bad. Look at the profanity that came out of Milo Y's mouth - yet he was applauded as a great rightwing speaker. Look at what comes out of our President's mouth - a President elected by the CONSERVATIVES. So excuse me if I'm just a wee bit cynical about the sudden horror and palpitations when a teenager uses expletives. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

You're right, there's probably a little too much profanity out there. But the thing is, Milo and Trump are both adults. Look, his profanity doesn't bother me at all so there's no "horror and palpitations" from this quarter. I point it out because, well, he is a kid as everyone keeps pointing out, and when I see him talk like that and insulting people the way he does, I'm just not moved by his rhetoric. He doesn't come across to me as a conscientious social warrior, he just comes across as a foul-mouthed pissed off kid.

2. The left (justifiably) got a lot of crap over anti-Trump demonstrations and Antifa's violence (even though we didn't largely support it). Fine. Now we have young people utilizing our rights - the right to petition the government. The right to demonstrate. And it's civil. But oh no. That's bad too. To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

It's great that the demonstrations are civil and it's great that they're exercising their Constitutional rights and personally, I have no problem with that. You and others here keep coming to their defense and telling us what they did not do or did not say. What they do not do or do not say is irrelevant. I'm concerned with what he did say and that was to call these politicians "...pathetic fuckers that want to kill more children." Am I supposed to just dismiss this because he did not kill a puppy yesterday?

Here's my view. He is FAR from unprincipled. He is VERY principled, and he is in pursuit of a very moral cause.

He may or may not be principled, I'm not arguing that he isn't. But what he said was definitely unprincipled.

You just don't happen to agree with it. That's fine. Every cause has many different legitimate views attached to it. The left certainly gets to hear your side when you hammer over and over how we want to kill kids by creating "gun free zones". To quote yourself - you can't have it both ways.

Irresponsible? I don't see it. Immature maybe. But that is to be expected. And I'm willing to bet if these kids were marching for arming teachers and concealed carry - you'd be cheering them on.

And you would lose that bet. I've never said anything for or against arming teachers.

You think it is fine for a 70 year old to be fowl mouthed, crude and call people names that a 6 year old would use. But find it crude in a 17 year old?

A 70 year old that grew up in Queens NYC.
This is the place that invented ball-busting.

I think this kid hasn't even gotten to the point where he can grow a beard, yet he thinks he can pass judgements on gun-owners or anyone who thinks his statements are based on nothing other than pure unfiltered BS.