Laura Loomer Files $3 BILLION Lawsuit Against Facebook for Defamation

[Faun]

Facebook is under no obligation to allow members to use their service to promote hate speech. And hate speech can be dangerous. We'll have to wait and see what she posted to warrant Facebook's actions si that we can then argue if it was hate speech or not.

theres no such thing as hate speech,,,

Of course there is. Hate speech is as simple as expressing hatred towards a specific group. It's not a legal term and does not present any legal consequences unless it becomes a verbal threat, but it is a thing and Facebook has a right to prohibit it on their website.

So when is Twitter and other Social Media outlets going to BAN Ohmar, Talib and AOC?

Facebook defines hate speech as a direct attack on people based on what they call protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability.

Show me where Omar, Tlaib or Cortez expressed such hate speech on Facebook.....

And the law defines calling someone a "dangerous person" to be defamation.

Not if that someone makes threatening statements. When that happens, they are dangerous.

 

[progressive hunter]

they provide a service same difference
doesn't matter what their TOS says if that TOS isnt applied and enforced with out bias or impartiality which they claim it is they are in violation of misrepresenting their service

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

So what? It's their site. If you don't like it, don't post your hate speech on it.

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

 

[Dragonlady]

She can't be all that abused, I've never even heard of her.

That doesn't matter for a defamation case.

She had100,000 followers who Facebook informed that she was banned for being dangerous. It's pretty clear cut. Only question is how much Facebook will pay.

.

Nothing. It's a private platform. If she was preaching hate (what most of those idiots have been banned for) she doesn't have a case.

doesn't matter if its a private company a company isnt allowed to misrepresent its product or service if Face book says decision made are done with out bias that they are impartial all you have to do is prove that decisions made are done with bias that they are not impartial

these Tech giants like Facebook cant tell its consumers one thing and then act differently just like manufactories cant put a made in the US tag on products made in China

It's a private company, they are under no constraints to be impartial. They could have banned her for no reason if they wanted to. Instead the banned her for hate speech, a clear violation of their TOS. She has no case.

The reason you're wrong has already been explained a couple dozen times in this thread. Pretending to be stupid isn't a good debate strategy.

But that is your ENTIRE debate strategy. To post stuff that is stupid and demonstrably false. Although in your case you're not pretending.

 

[WEATHER53]

So you invite me into you house to discuss things but then tell me what I can say. Does not sound like a discussion but rather a safe space snowflake back patting session.

 

[Faun]

Maybe, but that was not the question.
mYou get one "conservative" person on that jury and they are never going home without every single penny of what the plaintiff asks.

People are pissed about this shit. They will want Facebook to suffer.

Facebook was being a dick. They were stupid about it and pissed off a lot of people.

But, it may take a long time before plaintiff gets paid. Or not, when Facebook wants to rid itself of bad publicity and wants to avoid as many duplicate suits as possible.

.

FB to your point is already suffering bad publicity and I had never heard of Laura Loomer. If they ban someone like Ben Shapiro then all Hell will break loose.

Facebook is under no obligation to allow members to use their service to promote hate speech. And hate speech can be dangerous. We'll have to wait and see what she posted to warrant Facebook's actions si that we can then argue if it was hate speech or not.

theres no such thing as hate speech,,,

Of course there is. Hate speech is as simple as expressing hatred towards a specific group. It's not a legal term and does not present any legal consequences unless it becomes a verbal threat, but it is a thing and Facebook has a right to prohibit it on their website.

Loomer also has a right to sue them for defamation when Facebook uses it's arbitrary definition of "hate."

Everyone has the right to sue for just about anything. Your point is lost in your fucking moronicship.

 

[RealDave]

It's a private company, they are under no constraints to be impartial. They could have banned her for no reason if they wanted to. Instead the banned her for hate speech, a clear violation of their TOS. She has no case.

they are if they claim they are which Facebook and many other tech giants have under oath to congress

So all Loomer has to do is prove their decision was done with bias that they weren't impartial and not very hard to do with its record

A company isnt allowed to misrepresent its product or service they cant claim they are unbias that they are impartial and not be just like a manufacturer cant put a made in US tag on products made in China
Its called consumer protection
you against consumer protection? you against consumers not getting what a company claims they are getting?

Facebook doesn't produce a product. They provide a platform. You must abide by certain rukes to use their platform. Is you don't, they can remove you.

It's really just that simple. I already provided Facebook's partial list of TOS violations. She has no case.

they provide a service same difference
doesn't matter what their TOS says if that TOS isnt applied and enforced with out bias or impartiality which they claim it is they are in violation of misrepresenting their service

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

hate speech
noun
Definition of hate speech
: speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people Hate speech is not allowed at school.

 

[Faun]

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

So what? It's their site. If you don't like it, don't post your hate speech on it.

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

 

[Faun]

they are if they claim they are which Facebook and many other tech giants have under oath to congress

So all Loomer has to do is prove their decision was done with bias that they weren't impartial and not very hard to do with its record

A company isnt allowed to misrepresent its product or service they cant claim they are unbias that they are impartial and not be just like a manufacturer cant put a made in US tag on products made in China
Its called consumer protection
you against consumer protection? you against consumers not getting what a company claims they are getting?

Facebook doesn't produce a product. They provide a platform. You must abide by certain rukes to use their platform. Is you don't, they can remove you.

It's really just that simple. I already provided Facebook's partial list of TOS violations. She has no case.

they provide a service same difference
doesn't matter what their TOS says if that TOS isnt applied and enforced with out bias or impartiality which they claim it is they are in violation of misrepresenting their service

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

hate speech
noun
Definition of hate speech
: speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people Hate speech is not allowed at school.

Hey, look.... you found a definition for hate speech. So much for the nonsense that it's undefinunde.

 

[bripat9643]

theres no such thing as hate speech,,,

Of course there is. Hate speech is as simple as expressing hatred towards a specific group. It's not a legal term and does not present any legal consequences unless it becomes a verbal threat, but it is a thing.

you mean like the hatred for white people we hear everyday???

thats just speech you hate,,,and also truth if they do hate them,,,

facts dont care about your feelings,,,

this hate speech thing is just to silence opinion,,,

Nope, it's to prevent exposure to legal liability in cases where the hate speech leads to criminal behavior.

you mean like all the hate aimed at trump that results in attacks on anyone that even wears a hat with his slogan on it???

If someone posts something hateful which could reasonably be construed as a threat or promoting a threat, you can be sure they will receive a visit from the secret service. Just ask whatshername, the comedienne who portrayed a beheading of trump.

Of course, posting something "which could reasonably be construed as a threat or promoting a threat" has always been illegal. "Hate" is just opinions that Stalinists like you and Zuckerberg don't like.

 

[bripat9643]

Facebook doesn't produce a product. They provide a platform. You must abide by certain rukes to use their platform. Is you don't, they can remove you.

It's really just that simple. I already provided Facebook's partial list of TOS violations. She has no case.

they provide a service same difference
doesn't matter what their TOS says if that TOS isnt applied and enforced with out bias or impartiality which they claim it is they are in violation of misrepresenting their service

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

hate speech
noun
Definition of hate speech
: speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people Hate speech is not allowed at school.

Hey, look.... you found a definition for hate speech. So much for the nonsense that it's undefinunde.

The definition begs the question.

 

[progressive hunter]

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

So what? It's their site. If you don't like it, don't post your hate speech on it.

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

as long as they are equally applied,, which they arent,,,its all purely one sided,,,

 

[Faun]

they provide a service same difference
doesn't matter what their TOS says if that TOS isnt applied and enforced with out bias or impartiality which they claim it is they are in violation of misrepresenting their service

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

hate speech
noun
Definition of hate speech
: speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people Hate speech is not allowed at school.

Hey, look.... you found a definition for hate speech. So much for the nonsense that it's undefinunde.

The definition begs the question.

But you said it's undefinable... yet there's a definition.

 

[Faun]

So what? It's their site. If you don't like it, don't post your hate speech on it.

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

as long as they are equally applied,, which they arent,,,its all purely one sided,,,

Oh? I wasn't aware Louis Farrakhan is on your side. Thanks for clarifying that.

 

[bripat9643]

theres no such thing as hate speech,,,

Of course there is. Hate speech is as simple as expressing hatred towards a specific group. It's not a legal term and does not present any legal consequences unless it becomes a verbal threat, but it is a thing.

you mean like the hatred for white people we hear everyday???

thats just speech you hate,,,and also truth if they do hate them,,,

facts dont care about your feelings,,,

this hate speech thing is just to silence opinion,,,

Nope, it's to prevent exposure to legal liability in cases where the hate speech leads to criminal behavior.

you mean like all the hate aimed at trump that results in attacks on anyone that even wears a hat with his slogan on it???

Some say that wearing a MAGA Hat is the very definition of hate speech, and many people wear them in the HOPES that they will get beat up and they can claim victimhood.

Only a Stalinist douchebag would imagine that Trump supporters want to get beat up.

 

[progressive hunter]

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

as long as they are equally applied,, which they arent,,,its all purely one sided,,,

Oh? I wasn't aware Louis Farrakhan is on your side. Thanks for clarifying that.

how would you know what side is mine???

 

[bripat9643]

She was banned along with others who express hate speech, including Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

"Hate speech" is undefinable, and Facebook defines it to mean "any opinion Mark Zuckerberg doesn't like."

hate speech
noun
Definition of hate speech
: speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people Hate speech is not allowed at school.

Hey, look.... you found a definition for hate speech. So much for the nonsense that it's undefinunde.

The definition begs the question.

But you said it's undefinable... yet there's a definition.

ROFL! Are you admitting you don't know what it means to "beg the question?"

 

[bripat9643]

no such thing as hate speech,,,

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

as long as they are equally applied,, which they arent,,,its all purely one sided,,,

Oh? I wasn't aware Louis Farrakhan is on your side. Thanks for clarifying that.

He's a Democrat.

 

[Thinker101]

theres no such thing as hate speech,,,

Of course there is. Hate speech is as simple as expressing hatred towards a specific group. It's not a legal term and does not present any legal consequences unless it becomes a verbal threat, but it is a thing.

you mean like the hatred for white people we hear everyday???

thats just speech you hate,,,and also truth if they do hate them,,,

facts dont care about your feelings,,,

this hate speech thing is just to silence opinion,,,

Nope, it's to prevent exposure to legal liability in cases where the hate speech leads to criminal behavior.

you mean like all the hate aimed at trump that results in attacks on anyone that even wears a hat with his slogan on it???

Some say that wearing a MAGA Hat is the very definition of hate speech, and many people wear them in the HOPES that they will get beat up and they can claim victimhood.

Only in the HOPES that one of you looney libs give it a try.

 

[progressive hunter]

And yet, there is. I already posted what Facebook considers hate speech.

you said it,,,WHAT THEY CONSIDER,,,

and by their actions its all politically based and not about hate,,,

LOLOL

It's their website, so yeah, they get to create their own terms of service.

as long as they are equally applied,, which they arent,,,its all purely one sided,,,

Oh? I wasn't aware Louis Farrakhan is on your side. Thanks for clarifying that.

He's a Democrat.

not me,,,

 

[bripat9643]

The tech giants are about to get what they deserve. If they want to behave like publishers, then they can be subject to the same laws that publishers face. For instance, you can't go around labeling people as "haters, dangerous individual and white supremacists" without facing legal consequences.

Laura Loomer Files $3 BILLION Lawsuit Against Facebook for Defamation - Laura Loomer Official

On Tuesday, Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor announced the filing of a defamation lawsuit by conservative investigative journalist Laura Loomer against Facebook. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:19-cv-80893), alleges that Facebook and its wholly owned sister company Instagram, in banning Ms. Loomer from the social media sites, maliciously defamed her by publishing that she is a “dangerous individual” and a domestic Jewish terrorist.​

The truth hurts.

I love it.

The Trump supporting flame throwers spew trheir shit all over the internet & then run crying when the favor is returned.
You asssfucks need to grow the fuck up & try the truth instead of believing the Loomers & Limbaughs.

No wonder you are all dumber than shit.

If I own a newspaper, I don't have to print your shit.

I hope there is a counter suit & the dumb bitch loses everything.

Facebook is going to get $3 billion of truth.

When the lawsuit is thrown out will you leave the board?

Do you actually fear me that much?