Dot Com
Nullius in verba
he was trying to tell me, earlier in the day, that he wasn't an anarchistI am a Libertarian. I want NO government.
Correction: You are an anarchist.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![eusa_angel :eusa_angel: :eusa_angel:](/styles/smilies/eusa_angel.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he was trying to tell me, earlier in the day, that he wasn't an anarchistI am a Libertarian. I want NO government.
Correction: You are an anarchist.
Is trying to get rid of slavery and tyranny anarchism?
Are we using the English definitions of those words? Because I don't think you are.
From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.We don't have one person with all the power. People aren't 'slaves'. So get a little more specific as to what you're claiming to fight. And how its not anarchy.
From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.
Now well, I am aware that some people are members of cults and they have no problem living in that setting. So if you have been conditioned to be a slave them the present conditions in the US are not a problem to you.
From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.
Says who?
Now well, I am aware that some people are members of cults and they have no problem living in that setting. So if you have been conditioned to be a slave them the present conditions in the US are not a problem to you.
Or....some people don't take your ability to type a claim as indisputable proof that your claim must be true.
Why don't you make your argument factually and we can discuss it.
Those who are lucid. see post #26.
Relevancy?Why is the story hiding the name of the restaurant?
But the article ain't hiding the name:
Mrs Lady's Inc
Mrs Lady's Restaurant
24 South Highway 71
Arnolds Park, IA 51331 -
Phone: (712) 332-7373
Because he has no facts to support his 'argument.'From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.
Says who?
Now well, I am aware that some people are members of cults and they have no problem living in that setting. So if you have been conditioned to be a slave them the present conditions in the US are not a problem to you.
Or....some people don't take your ability to type a claim as indisputable proof that your claim must be true.
Why don't you make your argument factually and we can discuss it.
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmhe was trying to tell me, earlier in the day, that he wasn't an anarchistI am a Libertarian. I want NO government.
Correction: You are an anarchist.Like another mentioned, he would be one of the first to "meet jesus"
, were that to transpire.
![]()
Those who are lucid. see post #26.
And those who are lucid are those who just happen to agree with you, huh?
Have you ever heard of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy? You may want to look into it.
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm
It sounds like you are projecting.
Because he has no facts to support his 'argument.'From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.
Says who?
Now well, I am aware that some people are members of cults and they have no problem living in that setting. So if you have been conditioned to be a slave them the present conditions in the US are not a problem to you.
Or....some people don't take your ability to type a claim as indisputable proof that your claim must be true.
Why don't you make your argument factually and we can discuss it.
Contumacious said:
“I am a Libertarian. I want NO government.”
You are ridiculous.
What 's your agenda?