Law professor: Slippery slope to legal incest and polygamy

Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

You're a fucking clown, bro.

What is bad about insurance fraud?

It's stealing, bozo.
It's lying, bozo.

"dunce"

Holy fuck you bend backwards to be an ass hole.

But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:
 
You're a fucking clown, bro.

What is bad about insurance fraud?

It's stealing, bozo.
It's lying, bozo.

"dunce"

Holy fuck you bend backwards to be an ass hole.

But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:

Then surely you can quote Jesus on insider trading and insurance fraud.
 
Great post. The best part of proving Rabbi wrong, I've found, is that he'll never admit it...

...lol, as the post he made while I was writing this shows.

Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

Insurance fraud is lying and stealing. It's a sub-category in the general categories of lying and stealing.

Just like Matthew 19:1-8 talks about marriage as between man and woman? Oops.
 
But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:

Then surely you can quote Jesus on insider trading and insurance fraud.

No one can, because Jesus did not write anything down. I quoted Matthew, who quoted Jesus. And I tied it together for you above. If you still don't get it, I suggest you find an adult to explain it to you.
 
Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

Insurance fraud is lying and stealing. It's a sub-category in the general categories of lying and stealing.

Just like Matthew 19:1-8 talks about marriage as between man and woman? Oops.

Is there something in there where Jesus prohibits same sex marriage?

He prohibits divorce except in cases of adultery. How many Christians live by that rule?
 
Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

You're a fucking clown, bro.

What is bad about insurance fraud?

It's stealing, bozo.
It's lying, bozo.

"dunce"

Holy fuck you bend backwards to be an ass hole.

But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>

What about staying after church on Sunday until everyone's gone, then knocking the pastor over the head with a bronze crucifix, and then stealing all the money from the collection plate and various other valuables lying around.

Did Jesus specifically state that specific crime was wrong?
 
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:

Then surely you can quote Jesus on insider trading and insurance fraud.

No one can, because Jesus did not write anything down. I quoted Matthew, who quoted Jesus. And I tied it together for you above. If you still don't get it, I suggest you find an adult to explain it to you.

OK, so there are no quotations from Jesus on those topics. I guess that makes them OK!
Thanks!
 
You're a fucking clown, bro.

What is bad about insurance fraud?

It's stealing, bozo.
It's lying, bozo.

"dunce"

Holy fuck you bend backwards to be an ass hole.

But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>

What about staying after church on Sunday until everyone's gone, then knocking the pastor over the head with a bronze crucifix, and then stealing all the money from the collection plate and various other valuables lying around.

Did Jesus specifically state that specific crime was wrong?

Good point. No, he didnt. That must mean it's OK!
 
Oh, so you're being silly. All we know of what Jesus says is the bible. In the bible, Jesus never said a damn thing.

Why is it nobody calls the fornicators, adulterers, covetors, drunks, etc. "fake Christians"? No, only the gay ones, despite Jesus being completely mum on the subject.

I am never silly.

Or always silly, I get them confused.

As for whether we know about Jesus talking about homosexuals, that would actually depend on who you believe Jesus is, wouldn't it? Since most Christians believe he is God it would be pretty easy to argue that he actually did say something about it, even if he wasn't human at the time.

Would you like a list of people that call fornicators, adulterers, and drunks fake Christians, or do you want to admit that you are going to lose on that stupid argument before I go to the trouble? I can even give you a list of Christians that think people who speak in tongues aren't real Christians if it would help you admit you are wrong.

Jesus, in the bible, the book that talks about all the shit he said, is mum on the gays.

Sorry, but you're the one who is wrong. If you say and believe you are a Christian, you are. That's it. No special decoder ring.

The Bible is not mum on homosexuality.
 
Oh, so you're being silly. All we know of what Jesus says is the bible. In the bible, Jesus never said a damn thing.

Why is it nobody calls the fornicators, adulterers, covetors, drunks, etc. "fake Christians"? No, only the gay ones, despite Jesus being completely mum on the subject.

Jesus never said anything about insurance fraud either. Does that make it OK?

Incorrect.

16 And behold, a man came up to him, saying, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” 17 And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, 19 Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 19:16-22)

Bearing false witness is lying about someone in order to get them convicted of a crime, insurance fraud is not.
 
Incorrect.

16 And behold, a man came up to him, saying, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” 17 And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, 19 Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 19:16-22)

Great post. The best part of proving Rabbi wrong, I've found, is that he'll never admit it...

...lol, as the post he made while I was writing this shows.

Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

In that case, I can prove everyone that said Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality.

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. John 8:11
 
Unsurprisingly, this makes no sense.

Nothing in 10th Amendment jurisprudence authorizes the states to violate the due process and equal protection rights of their residents.

There is no violation.
But your point is: You are entitled to any opinion, as long as it agrees with mine.
Typical libs. They claim to respect divergent opinions and then are shocked and outraged when they discover there are divergent opinions.

The 10th Amendment only allows states to make laws that the federal government doesn't prevent them from making;

that would exclude unconstitutional laws.

The 10th Amendment does no such thing.
 
You're a fucking clown, bro.

What is bad about insurance fraud?

It's stealing, bozo.
It's lying, bozo.

"dunce"

Holy fuck you bend backwards to be an ass hole.

But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:

How could there have been insider trading in the time of Jesus when the first stock exchange didn't exist until the 17th century?
 
I dont see anything about insurance in all that.

Still waiting to see how gays are denied due process in anything. I wont hold my breath though. You're such a dunce.

You don't have to hold your breath...Just read the ruling in Windsor.

Although Congress has great authority to design laws to fit its own conception of sound national policy, it cannot deny the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment,"

I dont see anything about denying gays anything under due process. You fail.

Both DOMA and Prop 8 were ruled unconstitutional (one by SCOTUS) because they violated the due process of gays and lesbians.
 
Great post. The best part of proving Rabbi wrong, I've found, is that he'll never admit it...

...lol, as the post he made while I was writing this shows.

Please point out where "insurance" is in any of that.

In that case, I can prove everyone that said Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality.

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. John 8:11

So ALL sinners aren't Christians. Got it.
 
I am never silly.

Or always silly, I get them confused.

As for whether we know about Jesus talking about homosexuals, that would actually depend on who you believe Jesus is, wouldn't it? Since most Christians believe he is God it would be pretty easy to argue that he actually did say something about it, even if he wasn't human at the time.

Would you like a list of people that call fornicators, adulterers, and drunks fake Christians, or do you want to admit that you are going to lose on that stupid argument before I go to the trouble? I can even give you a list of Christians that think people who speak in tongues aren't real Christians if it would help you admit you are wrong.

Jesus, in the bible, the book that talks about all the shit he said, is mum on the gays.

Sorry, but you're the one who is wrong. If you say and believe you are a Christian, you are. That's it. No special decoder ring.

The Bible is not mum on homosexuality.

I didn't say the bible, I said Jesus.
 
But it's from an insurance company. And Jesus never spoke about insurance companies. So it must be OK.
What about insider trading? I didnt see Jesus say anything about insider trading. That must make it OK>
lol insurance and insider trading are not new. They existed even the time of Jesus. And he did speak to it. :dig:

How could there have been insider trading in the time of Jesus when the first stock exchange didn't exist until the 17th century?
Shares of property are not a new concept.
 
Jesus never said anything about insurance fraud either. Does that make it OK?

Incorrect.

16 And behold, a man came up to him, saying, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” 17 And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, 19 Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 19:16-22)

Bearing false witness is lying about someone in order to get them convicted of a crime, insurance fraud is not.

You don't get to define the terms of the bible.

Read the following uses of the term them come back and explain how bearing false witness about an accident to steal money is not the type of sin Jesus is talking about.

What Does the Bible Say About Bearing False Witness?
 
You don't have to hold your breath...Just read the ruling in Windsor.

Although Congress has great authority to design laws to fit its own conception of sound national policy, it cannot deny the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment,"

I dont see anything about denying gays anything under due process. You fail.

Both DOMA and Prop 8 were ruled unconstitutional (one by SCOTUS) because they violated the due process of gays and lesbians.

Not true.

SCOTUS actually said that no one had standing to defend Prop 8 when it was appealed to them, that has nothing to do with due process. If it did they would have actually decided the case on its merits.

By the way, the DOMA decision struck down the federal definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman, which means that, currently, there is nothing in federal law that puts any restrictions on polygamous marriages.
 
You don't have to hold your breath...Just read the ruling in Windsor.

Although Congress has great authority to design laws to fit its own conception of sound national policy, it cannot deny the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment,"

I dont see anything about denying gays anything under due process. You fail.

Both DOMA and Prop 8 were ruled unconstitutional (one by SCOTUS) because they violated the due process of gays and lesbians.

Pure legislation by the bench
 

Forum List

Back
Top