Jarlaxle
Gold Member
That's a lie. Remington did not do anything...because Remington Arms DID NOT EXIST when the case was settled. Remington had gone bankrupt, the case was settled (by the insurers) so the bankruptcy could go ahead.You're kidding, right? That ad (which was key to the Sandy Hook suit against Remington where Remington paid out 73 million) is not for sane people. Anyone who thinks a gun is going to restore his "Manliness" has serious issues.
He is more like Beria, with a dash of Vasily Blohkin.OK, Göbbels.
And bolt-actions, and single-shot breechloaders. (Like the Trapdoor Springfield.) Amusingly, it would NOT include many semiautomatic rifles-the first one-the Remington Autoloading Rifle (later the Remington Model 8) was strictly designed for civilian use.That would include flintlocks and muskets.