Jarlaxle
Gold Member
An irrelevant fact, if so. Joey is openly an admirer of Stalin.No, he is stating a fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An irrelevant fact, if so. Joey is openly an admirer of Stalin.No, he is stating a fact.
So the solution to people who live substandard lives is to just kill them in cold blood?
If it was about what she does with her own body, then she would be the one to die from an abortion, instead of her innocent child.
One again, anyone who defends the savage practice of abortio0n has no credibility whatsoever in expressing any concern for any human life. If you defend the “right” to murder the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings, then you are a hypocrite if you oppose any other violence.
It certainly makes you a horrendous hypocrite, if you oppose the rights of law-abiding human beings to legitimately keep and bars arms, on the basis that someone “might” use those arms unjustly to take a life.
The overwhelming vast majority of those who own firearms never use them to commit any act of violence against anyone.
100% of those who have abortions have willfully taken the life of an innocent human being.
Joey is a disciple of Stalin. He dreams of secret police with unlimited power...with, of course, himself as head of the NKVD.
Meanwhile in Israel
You've made it pretty clear that you would like to do away with the 2nd Amendment altogether; is that accurate?
You keep repeating the falsehood that anyone who doesn't want gun bans supports mass murder by the "crazies"
Basically, you're claiming that anyone who doesn't think like you is " one of those crazies".
I was a Psychiatric Case Worker on an inner city Emergency Psychiatric Unit. One of the most common complaints among the most delusional patients was being around "all of these crazies."
America already has laws prohibiting felons and the mentally ill from possessing firearms and they apparently don't work.
Next, you mention how much less violence exists in those "developed countries" that are in no way like the US. (1)
(1). "The Mistake of Only Comparing US Murder Rates to "Developed" Countries"
If you have to walk around with a gun because you are terrified that your neighbors are going to kill you, you are doing it wrong.
Seems to work. If it works, it ain't wrong.
Aren’t they? If you have nothing to fear, stop worrying about who’s got guns.If you have to walk around with a gun because you are terrified that your neighbors are going to kill you, you are doing it wrong.
Israel is safer than almost all major US cities.Um, the Zionist entity hardly "works". It's an international pariah, half the people have to keep their boots to the neck of the other half, because they no damned well they'd all be driven into the sea if they didn't.
That's not a system that works.
You can't sue a firearm manufacturer because someone illegally misused a product they made. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005,I'm fascinated by this. I'm not anti-guns. I'm not Kneejerk against all gun control proposals. I'm fascinated by the legal issue(s) here. This isn't really about the 2nd Amendment 'right'. The article is speaking to the responsibilities that come with freedom and commerce. This is a huge issue now regarding holding gun makers accountable.
I'm going to "
Listen to This Article
Download New York Times Audio
Listen to this story in the New York Times Audio app on iOS.
Gun Makers and Mass Shootings
![]()
The Lawyer Trying to Hold Gunmakers Responsible for Mass Shootings
Josh Koskoff’s legal victory against Remington has raised the possibility of a new form of gun control: lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.www.nytimes.com
This idiot once upon a time thought just like you.If you have to walk around with a gun because you are terrified that your neighbors are going to kill you, you are doing it wrong.
When will we start holding car companies responsible?I'm fascinated by this. I'm not anti-guns. I'm not Kneejerk against all gun control proposals. I'm fascinated by the legal issue(s) here. This isn't really about the 2nd Amendment 'right'. The article is speaking to the responsibilities that come with freedom and commerce. This is a huge issue now regarding holding gun makers accountable.
I'm going to "
Listen to This Article
Download New York Times Audio
Listen to this story in the New York Times Audio app on iOS.
Gun Makers and Mass Shootings
![]()
The Lawyer Trying to Hold Gunmakers Responsible for Mass Shootings
Josh Koskoff’s legal victory against Remington has raised the possibility of a new form of gun control: lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.www.nytimes.com
Aren’t they? If you have nothing to fear, stop worrying about who’s got guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.You can't sue a firearm manufacturer because someone illegally misused a product they made. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005,
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.This idiot once upon a time thought just like you.
Is that why Newsom freed over a hundred thousand VIOLENT felons from prison early the past few years? Too many violent crazies out there?The reason why we have reasons to fear is too many crazy people have guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.
And took Remington for 73 million dollars.
Probably 90% of these lawsuits will be dismissed, but the 10% that get through will get the gun industry to change its ways or go bankrupt, and I'm perfectly fine with either.
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.
The sandy hook families didn't win because Remington tried to settle. Remington had already closed it's doors and went out of business. It was the lawyers who settled.The reason why we have reasons to fear is too many crazy people have guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.
And took Remington for 73 million dollars.
Probably 90% of these lawsuits will be dismissed, but the 10% that get through will get the gun industry to change its ways or go bankrupt, and I'm perfectly fine with either.
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.
Sandy Hook won because of the advertising, not because there was something wrong with the firearm.The reason why we have reasons to fear is too many crazy people have guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.
And took Remington for 73 million dollars.
Probably 90% of these lawsuits will be dismissed, but the 10% that get through will get the gun industry to change its ways or go bankrupt, and I'm perfectly fine with either.
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.
The reason why we have reasons to fear is too many crazy people have guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.
And took Remington for 73 million dollars.
Probably 90% of these lawsuits will be dismissed, but the 10% that get through will get the gun industry to change its ways or go bankrupt, and I'm perfectly fine with either.
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.
The reason why we have reasons to fear is too many crazy people have guns.
Yet the Sandy Hook families were able to do so despite this law.
And took Remington for 73 million dollars.
Probably 90% of these lawsuits will be dismissed, but the 10% that get through will get the gun industry to change its ways or go bankrupt, and I'm perfectly fine with either.
No, he probably wondered why we aren't treating our homeless population for their mental illnesses.
Aren’t they? If you have nothing to fear, stop worrying about who’s got guns.
That dance is plain stupid.a firearm is designed to shoot a projectile at any target living or inanimate the owner chooses. Only military weapons are designed to kill humans.