Lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.

[BackAgain]

Second amendment is about militias. No mention of guns at all.

No. It’s not “about” militias you ignorant simp.
It doesn’t say “guns.” It says “arms.” Arms are guns, you fuckwit.

 

[westwall]

Second amendment is about militias. No mention of guns at all.

Liar.

 

[westwall]

No. It’s not “about” militias you ignorant simp.
It doesn’t say “guns.” It says “arms.” Arms are guns, you fuckwit.

Lying fuckwit.

Never forget the lying part.

 

[Auld Phart]

Sure. Let the victims of gun violence sue the gun makers and gun stores.

you'd be AMAZED how quickly they'll clean up their act.

Let the victims of gun violence sue the gun makers and gun stores.

for what?

making a working firearm?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Do you really believe that the people in marketing at Smith & Wesson target people who are mentally ill or criminals?

How did you come to this conclusion?

Thanks,

Perhaps it is because he is mentally ill or a criminal?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yes.


View attachment 836918

Exactly where did you find this ad? You had to look for it!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I was never required to keep my gun at a gun club.

Were you in Great Britain? Try reading.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Were you in Great Britain? Try reading.

It's US Message Board, Not Limey Forums.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It's US Message Board, Not Limey Forums.

I guess you don't know that he was referring to the UK, dumbass!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Second amendment is about militias. No mention of guns at all.

learn the English language and how sentences work.

 

[JoeB131]

No. It’s not “about” militias you ignorant simp.
It doesn’t say “guns.” It says “arms.” Arms are guns, you fuckwit.

So no mention of guns, and it talks about the militia being well-regualted. (Which is how the courts interpreted it for over 200 years.

for what?

making a working firearm?

For marketing them to people who have no business having them.

 

[BackAgain]

So no mention of guns,

It addresses “arms.” Those ARE guns, you imbecile.

 

[Auld Phart]

So no mention of guns, and it talks about the militia being well-regualted. (Which is how the courts interpreted it for over 200 years.


For marketing them to people who have no business having them.

So no mention of guns, and it talks about the militia being well-regualted.

The problem being, the right to keep and bear arms was given top the people.

For marketing them to people who have no business having them.

They market them to criminals?

They market them to children?

"people who have no business having them."

such as?

 

[Auld Phart]

It addresses “arms.” Those ARE guns, you imbecile.

joe is outstanding in his field.

 

[Grau]

Perhaps it is because he is mentally ill or a criminal?

I prefer not to insult others but to suggest that the marketing departments of America's major gun makers are appealing to to the mentally ill and criminals is just absurd.

Thanks,

 

[Grau]

Yes.


View attachment 836918

I don't really see this silly advertisement as an appeal to criminals or the mentally ill.
It seems to appeal to those who are uncertain about their "manliness" like teenagers or those who are generally insecure.

What in this advertisement do you see anything that would appeal to the criminal element or the mentally ill?

Thanks,

 

[JoeB131]

It addresses “arms.” Those ARE guns, you imbecile.

So are swords and clubs.

Maybe we can let everyone just walk around with a sword. Then they can protect their homes without making it easy to go on a rampage at a local school.

Problem solved.

 

[JoeB131]

I don't really see this silly advertisement as an appeal to criminals or the mentally ill.
It seems to appeal to those who are uncertain about their "manliness" like teenagers or those who are generally insecure.

What in this advertisement do you see anything that would appeal to the criminal element or the mentally ill?

You're kidding, right? That ad (which was key to the Sandy Hook suit against Remington where Remington paid out 73 million) is not for sane people. Anyone who thinks a gun is going to restore his "Manliness" has serious issues.

 

[Grau]

You're kidding, right? That ad (which was key to the Sandy Hook suit against Remington where Remington paid out 73 million) is not for sane people. Anyone who thinks a gun is going to restore his "Manliness" has serious issues.

I already said that I thought that the advertisement was "silly" but it doesn't trigger some latent homicidal instinct that would send me or anyone else into a homicidal fury.

It's just a dumb ad, that's all.

That doesn't mean that the anti gun people won't continue to try to disarm Americans by bankrupting America gun and ammunition makers with frivolous lawsuits.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I prefer not to insult others but to suggest that the marketing departments of America's major gun makers are appealing to to the mentally ill and criminals is just absurd.

When JoeB131 speaks of “the mentally ill and criminals”, what he means is sane, law-abiding human beings.

Almost everything that JoeB131 ever says makes perfect sense, only when you realize that he is on the side of criminals, crazies, perverts, and other dregs of subhumanity, and against the side of actual human beings.

If you try to make any sense of any of what he says, from the point of view of being on the side of human beings, then he makes no sense at all.