Lets remember WHY Charlottesville rally happened to begin with

[Marion Morrison]

Only white people could make involuntary sharecropping a "good thing". SMDH.

Slavery was better; just ask those freed slaves who went back to Africa and started Liberia, and set themselves up as slave plantation owners as soon as they set foot back in 'Da Homey Land'.

I dont have to ask anyone. I heard all the stories from my grandparents about slavery and the time afterwards already. So much so I know youre full of shit as usual.

So how many generations has your family been in America?

 

[Asclepias]

My ideology?
Hardly, The Southerners brought in Negroes like you, hardly anything I'd support.

This is the reason most white nationalists hate southern plantation owners and love the white nationalist Lincoln; the vast majority of the abolitionists in the North wanted to send them all back to Africa, no exceptions. Northerners were far more racist than southerners, and still are; they just make a lot of hypocritical noises trying to cover up that fact.

But the side who won ended slavery --- but if you want to say that the northern whites were more racist than the southern whites -- enjoy that

......However, its still the Southern whites who are still trying to revise history and make the claim that slavery wasn't so bad..what a bunch of sore losers -- the South lost deal with it

You want to argue that black slaves had it worse than 'free' white labor? Good luck with that; you will lose that argument as well. the only 'revisionists' are you lying spammers and your fake revisionist history about the civil war.

Quick question that should clear things up for you. Did the free white labor have to worry about their children automatically being denied freedom?

Moot point; most of them couldn't afford children, while nearly all slaves could. Slaves had a guaranteed living and health care. Most 'free white labor' starved in winter, economic slumps, in the frequent disease epidemics that swept slums, had shorter life spans and shorter average heights than slaves due to chronic malnutrition. Child mortality rates were higher than among slaves when they did have children. And, we know blacks have never had a thing against slavery, in Africa nor in the U.S.

No its not a moot point. Try that shit on someone not smarter than you. Kids were valuable back then as they represented extra hands that could work. Most white free laborers were free to move elsewhere and get paid so stop with the sob story bullshit.

 

[Asclepias]

Only white people could make involuntary sharecropping a "good thing". SMDH.

Slavery was better; just ask those freed slaves who went back to Africa and started Liberia, and set themselves up as slave plantation owners as soon as they set foot back in 'Da Homey Land'.

I dont have to ask anyone. I heard all the stories from my grandparents about slavery and the time afterwards already. So much so I know youre full of shit as usual.

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

 

[Pogo]

Show us the roster of Black Confederate Infantry that saw action. This outta be good.

Fuck you dumbass, it's in the post you quoted, retard. That's how stupid you are.

"

Soldiers' Unclaimed Medals, W.Va. State Archives

NAME - DATE OF ENLISTMENT - MEMORANDA
Addison, Mark; 30 Apr 1864; Killed 07 Oct 1864 - SERVICE RECORD
Allen, Edmund; 28 Jul 1864; b Carolina Co., Va. - SERVICE RECORD
Allen, George [Gustavus]; 26 Aug 1864; Substitute - SERVICE RECORD
Anderson, George; 25 Apr 1864 - SERVICE RECORD
Ankrum, Charles; 07 Sep 1864; b Harrison Co., (W)Va. - SERVICE RECORD
Atkins, Robert; 22 Feb 1865; b Franklin Co., Va. - SERVICE RECORD
Augustus, Charles; 05 Aug 1864; Substitute - SERVICE RECORD
Bailey, James; 07 Sep 1864; b Surrey Co., Va.
Baker, Harvey; 07 Jul 1864; b Bottetourt Co., Va.
Beckwood, David; 11 Oct 1864; b Hardy Co., (W)Va.
Benett (Bennet/Bennett), Doctor; 28 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.
Billops, Hiram; 22 May 1864
Blad, Presley; 05 May 1864
Boggess, Isaac; 05 Jun 1864
Bolden, Andrew; 22 Aug 1864; b Harrison Co., (W)Va.; Recruit
Bolen (Bollen), William A.; 29 Mar 1865; Substitute
Bowie, Tip; 22 Sep 1864; Drafted
Boyd, James; 01 Aug 1864; b Cherokee Co., Va.
Brady, James; 11 Oct 1864; b Hardy Co., (W)Va.
Brady, Jared; 13 Oct 1864; Substitute
Brown, Jesse; 12 May 1864
Brown, Rufus; 22 May 1864
Burke, George W.; 22 May 1864
Burks, Charles; 22 May 1864
Burks, James; 22 May 1864
Burks, Tyler; 22 May 1864
Butler, Julius; 25 Apr 1864
Callinder (Collender), George W.; 25 May 1864
Campbell, Henry; 16 Aug 1864; Substitute
Campbell, William; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.
Chile, Selp (Selt; Sell); 11 Aug 1864; Substitute
Clark, George; 28 Feb 1865; b. Va.
Clark, Mitchell T.; 22 May 1864
Clay, Henry; 15 Feb 1865; b Greenbrier Co., (W)Va.
Copeland, David; 16 Feb 1865; Recruit; b Norfolk, Va.
Crawford, John W.; 09 Aug 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.
Crenehall (Crenchall), Charles; 01 Aug 1864; b New Kent Co., Va.
Davis, George W.; 07 Jul 1864; b Fauquier Co., VA.
Davis, Jonathan; 03 Sep 1864; b Crawford Co., Va.
Dennis, Alexander; 07 Jul 1864; b Prince Edward Co., Va.
*Dennis, James; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.
Dodd, Bur (Burr); 21 Mar 1865; b Harrison Co., (W)Va.
Dunott, George; 12 May 1864
Edmundson, George; 22 Aug 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Recruit
Ellis, James; 11 Jul 1864; b Orange Co., Va.
Fairfax, Henry; 07 Jul 1864; b Bottetourt Co., Va.
Farmer, Augustus; 22 May 1864
Field (Fields), Washington; 07 Jul 1864; b New Kent Co., Va.
Ford, Isaac; 07 Jul 1864; b Lynchburg, N.C.
Foster, Samuel; 25 Aug 1864; b Ohio Co., (W)Va.
Galbrath, George; 22 May 1864
Gates (Gater), Job; 11 Oct 1864; b Hardy Co., (W)Va.
Gordon, Zachariah; 07 Jul 1864; b Sussex Co., Va.
Graham, Lee; 18 Feb 1865; Substitute; not on U.S. Archives film
Grant, James; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Laborer
Grason, David; 07 Jul 1864; b Augusta Co., Va.; Laborer
Gray, James; 07 Jul 1864; b Sussex Co., Va.; Laborer
Green, Joseph; 08 Aug 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Laborer
Grimes, Sawney (Lawney); 07 Jul 1864; b Orange Co., Va.; Not assigned; Servant
Hall, Basil; 27 Feb 1865; b Washington Co., Va.; Recruit; Servant
Hall, John P.; 25 Oct 1864; b Braxton Co., (W)Va.; Farmer
Hall, Philip; 07 Jul 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Laborer
Harris, David E.; 03 Mar 1865; Substitute
Harris, Scott; 07 Sep 1864; Substitute
Harrison, Levi; 22 May 1864
Hayes (Hays), Alfred; 15 Aug 1864; Substitute
Henry, Daniel; 07 Jul 1864; b Santee, N.C.; Laborer
Hickman, Floyd; 22 May 1864
Hickman, George W.; 22 May 1864
Hickman, Lewis; 22 May 1864
Hill, Henry B. (Henry P.); 13 Aug 1864; Substitute
Holliway, James (Charles??); (Charles 01 Jun 1864)
Hopkins, Campbell; 01 Jun 1864
Hunter, Nimrod; 25 Oct 1864; b Braxton County, (W)Va.; Farmer; Recruit
Hyson, Freeland; 28 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Farmer; Unassigned
Ironton, John Y.; 25 Aug 1864; b Amherst, Va.; Recruit; Laborer
Jackson, Henry; 04 Aug 1864; Substitute
Jasper, Shadrack (Shadrach); 07 Jul 1864; b Henrico Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Jenkins, Thomas; 07 Sep 1864
Johnson, Jesse; 25 Oct 1864; Substitute; b Braxton Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
*Johnson, William; 22 May 1864
Jones, Chadrick; 06 Apr 1865; Substitute; not on Archives film
Jones, Edward; 09 Apr 1865; Drafted
Jones, Henry; 07 Jul 1864; b Sussex Co., Va.; Laborer
Jones, John Y.; 29 Mar 1865; Substitute
Jones (Gones), Thomas; 15 Aug 1864; b Jefferson Co., (W)Va.
Kerchenberry (Kerchenberg), Noah; 22 Nov 1864; Substitute
Kinney, Joseph (John); 08 Aug 1864; b Louisa Co., Va.; Recruit; Blacksmith
Kinney, Lee; 07 Sep 1864; b Augusta Co., Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Kyle, George W.; 25 Aug 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Recruit; Laborer
Lane, Richard; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Lawrentz, Joshua; 22 Aug 1864; b Edgecomb Co., N.C.; Recruit; Laborer
Lee, Ludwell; 25 Apr 1864
Leigh, Whedan; 30 Apr 1864
Lewis, Cruwley (Crawley); 14 Mar 1865; Drafted
Lewis, Henry; 08 Aug 1864; b Augusta Co., Va.; Recruit; Laborer
*Lewis, Isaac; 06 Aug 1864; Substitute
Lewis, John; 11 Aug 1864; Substitute
Lewis, Samuel; 03 Sep 1864; b Fauquier Co., Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Lewis, William; 16 Aug 1864
Lowry (Lowery), Sandy; 24 Aug 1864; Substitute
Lynn, Henry M.; 22 Aug 1864; b Taylor Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Laborer
Madison, George; 01 Apr 1865; b Nelson Co., Va.; Recruit; Laborer
Malone (Mahone in 1865 AG Report), John H. (Henry); 25 Apr 1864
Marshall, George; 11 Feb 1865; Substitute
Marshall, Washington; 07 Jul 1864; b in Fauquier Co., Va.; Laborer
Mason, George; 13 Aug 1864; b Louden Co., Va.; Recruit; Laborer
McCoy, Jeremiah; 14 Feb 1865; Recruit
Minness, Calihill; 25 Oct 1864; b Nicholas Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Mitchell, Lewis; 10 May 1864
Monroe, James; 28 Jul 1864; b Franklin Co., Va.; Farmer
Monroe, Jefferson; 08 Aug 1864; b Fauquier Co., Va.; Recruit; Wagoner
Moplington, John G.; 15 Mar 1865; b Hampshire Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Newland, George; 23 Mar 1865; Drafted
Nichols, George; 07 Sep 1864; b Bottetourt Co., Va.; Farmer
Page, Stephen; 22 May 1864
Parish, Anderson; 07 Apr 1865; Substitute
Parish, James; 09 Aug 1864; b Nelson Co., Va.; Farmer
Parish, Reuben; 24 Feb 1865; Substitute
Paxton, Samuel; 07 Jul 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Laborer
Pendelton (Pendleton), John; 07 Jul 1864; b b Bottetourt Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Price, Anthony; 04 Aug 1864; Substitute
Ranste (Rauste in 1865 AG Report)(Ransle), Morton; 31 May 1864
Reed, Richard; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Revels, George; 09 Apr 1865; Substitute
Richardson, Pleasat (Pleasant); 20 Feb 1865; Substitute
Ritchards, John; 24 Aug 1864; Substitute; not on Archives film
Robinson, Jack; 01 Sep 1864; b Lewis Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Rogers, Elisha L.; 29 Mar 1865; b Harrison Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Rogers, Milo; 25 Mar 1865; Substitute
Rose (Ross), Thomas; 04 Aug 1864; Substitute
Sandy, Vincent; 29 Aug 1864; Substitute
Scott, Aaron; 07 Sep 1864; b Randolph Co., (W)Va.; Farmer
Sebastipol (Sebastepool), Leman; 22 May 1864
Shannon, Edward; 22 May 1864
Simmons, Henry; 28 Jul 1864; b Bath Co., Va.; Unassigned; Waiter
Simms, John S.; 29 Mar 1865; b Edgefield Dist., S.C.; Recruit; Laborer
Siuer (Siner), John; 06 Aug 1864; Substitute
Slaughter, Henry; 01 Mar 1865; b Madison Co., Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Smith, James W.; 07 Sep 1864; Substitute
Smith, Reuben; 16 Aug 1864; b Taylor Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Stark, George; 10 Apr 1865; Substitute
Stave, Benjamin; 15 Aug 1864; b Randolph Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer
Stevens, George; 28 Jul 1864<; b Bottetourt Co., Va.; Unassigned; Farmer
Stewart, George; 22 Mar 1865; Substitute
Strother (Strothers), Erastus; 23 Aug 1864; Substitute
Suel, Parker; 07 Jul 1864; b Raleigh Co., N.C.; Unassigned; Laborer
Taylor, Timothy; 22 May 1864
Tenner, John; 31 May 1864
Thaxton, Henry; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Thomas, Charles; 31 May 1864
Thomas, Samuel; 17 Aug 1864
Thompson, Dallas; 22 May 1864
Tyler, Samuel; 17 Aug 1864
Vass, Frederick; 30 Aug 1864; Substitute
Vinson, James; 05 Sep 1864; Substitute
Wade, Benjamin; 28 Jul 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Unassigned; Farmer
Wade, John; 28 Jul 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Unassigned; Farmer
Wades, Wesley; 07 Jul 1864; b Franklin Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Washington, Granville (G.); 22 Mar 1865; b Harrison Co., (W)Va.; Laborer
Watson, Frederick; 04 Aug 1864; Substitute
White, Henry; 07 Jul 1864; b Rockbridge Co., Va.; Laborer
Wilkes (Wilks), Albert; 07 Jul 1864; b Campbell Co., Va.; Unassigned
Wilkinson, James; 03 Apr 1865; Substitute
Williams, Abraham; 20 Apr 1864
Williams, John K.; 07 Jul 1864; b in Pensacola,Florida; Unassigned; Laborer
Williams, Peter; 28 Jul 1864; b Petersburg, Va.; Farmer
Williams, Preston; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned; Laborer
Williams, Samuel H.; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned
Williams, William; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Laborer
Williams, Wilson; 11 Jul 1864; b Bottebourt Co., Va.; Laborer
Williams, Wyatt; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Laborer
Wilson, William; 07 Jul 1864; b Bedford Co., Va.; Unassigned; Servant - SERVICE RECORD
Withers, William; 26 Sep 1864; b b Harrison Co., (W)Va.; Recruit; Farmer - SERVICE RECORD
Young, John H.; 25 May 1864 - SERVICE RECORD
"

Now fuck off and die, pls.

West Virginia was in the Confederacy now?

Hey why not, as long as we're in total rewrite mode....

When the new emoties came out I predicted that would be the least-used one.

You're the first poster I've seen with the cojones to use it. Good on ya.

It is what it is, those guys fought for the Union. Somehow I thought everything Maryland South fought for the Confederacy. Learned something new today.

Rarely is that admission made here.

West Virginia formed in 1861 when it seceded from Virginia after Virginia seceded from the US (and admitted 1863). As with many areas within the original Confederacy those northwestern counties wanted no part of it. Right over these mountains (pointing west) East Tennessee, which also voted heavily against seceding, tried to do the same thing but were prevented by occupying Confederate troops. During the war, pockets of anti-Confederate resistance communities such as the Free State of Jones (MIssissippi), the Free State of Winston (Alabama), Searcy County Arkansas and Scott County Tennessee resisted the CSA and supplied personnel to the Union army. The South was having an inner civil war within as well as without, between the "Haves", the rich indolent planters who incited the war, and the "Have Nots" who despised that element.

>> Wartime disaffection among Southerners had solid roots in the early secession crisis. Most white Southerners, three-fourths of whom owned no slaves, made it clear in the winter 1860-61 elections for state convention delegates that they opposed immediate secession. Nevertheless, state conventions across the South, all of them dominated by slaveholders, ultimately ignored majority will and took their states out of the Union. One Texas politician conceded that ambitious colleagues had engineered secession without strong backing from “the mass of the people.” A staunch South Carolina secessionist admitted the same. “But,” he asked, “whoever waited for the common people when a great move was to be made—we must make the move and force them to follow.”[2]

... In October 1861, one worried Confederate wrote to his governor that “our people don’t seem to be inclined to offer their services.” That same month, a recruiter from Columbus, Georgia, reported to the war department that it was almost impossible to find volunteers. In February 1862, W. H. Byrd of Augusta, Georgia, wrote that he had been trying for two weeks to raise a company in what he called “this ‘Yankee City,’ but I regret to say every effort has failed.” That failure did not result from a lack of potential recruits. The Augusta Chronicle and Sentinel had noted a week earlier that “one who walks Broad street and sees the number of young men, would come to the conclusion that no war . . . was now waging.”[4]

The Confederacy’s response to its recruitment problems served only to weaken its support among plain folk. In April 1862 the Confederate Congress passed the first general conscription act in American history. But men of wealth could avoid the draft by hiring a substitute or paying an exemption fee. For planters, Congress also exempted one white male of draft age for every twenty slaves owned. This twenty slave law was the most widely hated act ever imposed by the Confederacy. Said Private Sam Watkins of Tennessee, “It gave us the blues; we wanted twenty negroes. Negro property suddenly became very valuable, and there was raised the howl of ‘rich man’s war, poor man’s fight.’”[5]

.... Women defied Confederate authorities by staging food riots from Richmond, Virginia, to Galveston, Texas. Soldiers deserted by the tens of thousands, and draft evasion became commonplace. By 1864, the draft law was practically impossible to enforce and two-thirds of the Confederate army was absent with or without leave. Many deserters and draft dodgers formed armed bands that controlled vast areas of the Southern countryside.<< -- Southern Unionism​

West Virginia with its poor soil and dependence on mining would have been in the "Have Not" camp like East Tennessee and most of Appalachia. So within the South the War was at least as much about the rich waging war at the expense of the poor and working class as any latter-day contrived "states rights" issue.

This is another way the whole Lost Cause mythology with its imagery of wall-to-wall Gone With the Wind lazy plantations with happy slaves, tells a great big lie about what was really going on. And again, this mythology was propagated by the UDC, who came from the same element --- the Southern aristocracy --- that incited the War in the first place, trying to sanitize their legacy. Well, the rest of the South didn't appreciate that either.

 

[Asclepias]

Only white people could make involuntary sharecropping a "good thing". SMDH.

Slavery was better; just ask those freed slaves who went back to Africa and started Liberia, and set themselves up as slave plantation owners as soon as they set foot back in 'Da Homey Land'.

I dont have to ask anyone. I heard all the stories from my grandparents about slavery and the time afterwards already. So much so I know youre full of shit as usual.

You know squat, and neither did your grandparents. All you know is that some rich white people who don't pay taxes will give you losers money for sniveling. Your parents would be slave owners today if it were legal, and so would you if you could afford them.

Youre a lice head white boy. Nothing you say can change the facts. My grandparents told me about slavery and Jim Crow so I dont have to get the story from anyone else.

 

[Picaro]

This is the reason most white nationalists hate southern plantation owners and love the white nationalist Lincoln; the vast majority of the abolitionists in the North wanted to send them all back to Africa, no exceptions. Northerners were far more racist than southerners, and still are; they just make a lot of hypocritical noises trying to cover up that fact.

But the side who won ended slavery --- but if you want to say that the northern whites were more racist than the southern whites -- enjoy that

......However, its still the Southern whites who are still trying to revise history and make the claim that slavery wasn't so bad..what a bunch of sore losers -- the South lost deal with it

You want to argue that black slaves had it worse than 'free' white labor? Good luck with that; you will lose that argument as well. the only 'revisionists' are you lying spammers and your fake revisionist history about the civil war.

Quick question that should clear things up for you. Did the free white labor have to worry about their children automatically being denied freedom?

Moot point; most of them couldn't afford children, while nearly all slaves could. Slaves had a guaranteed living and health care. Most 'free white labor' starved in winter, economic slumps, in the frequent disease epidemics that swept slums, had shorter life spans and shorter average heights than slaves due to chronic malnutrition. Child mortality rates were higher than among slaves when they did have children. And, we know blacks have never had a thing against slavery, in Africa nor in the U.S.

No its not a moot point. Try that shit on someone not smarter than you. Kids were valuable back then as they represented extra hands that could work. Most white free laborers were free to move elsewhere and get paid so stop with the sob story bullshit.

You're too stupid to figure out you contradict yourself here. Traveling cost money, so no, 'free' whites couldn't just go elsewhere any time they felt like it, moron. You sound like those idiot right wingers who claim everybody who is unemployed can just jump up and move.

 

[Pogo]

If elements of the civil war bother you so much, then you ought to simply avoid visiting them, but have enough respect for your fellow man not to impose your values on others by force, and find something useful enough to do with your life other than create and escalate a rather useless, pointless "war" over a matter settled 153 years ago as if we have nothing more important to worry about, but if you really have nothing better to do with your life than to pick a fight and beat people's heads in or get yours beat in over a statue in a park, then perhaps you ought to do it soon to relieve the earth of the burden of caring for all your dumb asses so that the normal, sane people can get on with the business of the world.

If the people of this country had the wherewithal to spend even half as much effort working together on common causes rather than fighting each other on stupid and useless ones, we could end suffering, poverty and all be leading much better lives.

Worthy thoughts. Recalling (finally) the topic of this thread.

As I noted in my first post here,"why Charlottesville happened" was a bunch of jagoffs from out of town waddling in to Charlottesville to, as you put it, "impose their values by force" on a city that had already decided what to do with its own property. Including the David Dukes and Richard Spencers and other "very fine people", come in to start some shit.

Good to see you're on the right side on this one.

Having a rally to present your beliefs imposes nothing on anyone.

That's as fast a 180 as anyone's ever done. Kind of like a rhetorical handbrake turn.

Way to stand behind your position. Or as I like to put it, "Having it both ways --- Priceless".

 

[Asclepias]

But the side who won ended slavery --- but if you want to say that the northern whites were more racist than the southern whites -- enjoy that

......However, its still the Southern whites who are still trying to revise history and make the claim that slavery wasn't so bad..what a bunch of sore losers -- the South lost deal with it

You want to argue that black slaves had it worse than 'free' white labor? Good luck with that; you will lose that argument as well. the only 'revisionists' are you lying spammers and your fake revisionist history about the civil war.

Quick question that should clear things up for you. Did the free white labor have to worry about their children automatically being denied freedom?

Moot point; most of them couldn't afford children, while nearly all slaves could. Slaves had a guaranteed living and health care. Most 'free white labor' starved in winter, economic slumps, in the frequent disease epidemics that swept slums, had shorter life spans and shorter average heights than slaves due to chronic malnutrition. Child mortality rates were higher than among slaves when they did have children. And, we know blacks have never had a thing against slavery, in Africa nor in the U.S.

No its not a moot point. Try that shit on someone not smarter than you. Kids were valuable back then as they represented extra hands that could work. Most white free laborers were free to move elsewhere and get paid so stop with the sob story bullshit.

You're too stupid to figure out you contradict yourself here. Traveling cost money, so no, 'free' whites couldn't just go elsewhere any time they felt like it, moron. You sound like those idiot right wingers who claim everybody who is unemployed can just jump up and move.

Hey stupid. You dont travel and not make money. Clean out your eyes. I said they can travel to find work instead of staying at home and starving.

 

[Marion Morrison]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb. I'm gonna buy the house next to you, fix it up, and make $20k.

Derp! Oh! I need to be more humble.

 

[Asclepias]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

 

[Marion Morrison]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

So how many head you runnin', bro?

 

[Marion Morrison]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

I made a mistake, and I admitted it, that's part of being a man.

If you think you can jump all over me about it, I'll kick you dead in your ass.

 

[Asclepias]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

So how many head you runnin', bro?

Not everyone wants to be a cowboy slick.

 

[Asclepias]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

I made a mistake, and I admitted it, that's part of being a man.

If you think you can jump all over me about it, I'll kick you dead in your ass.

Part of being smart is not being a fool and falling for photo shopped images.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Robert E Lee was very pro-black.

 

[Asclepias]

Robert E Lee was very pro-black.

I hope you were being sarcastic.

 

[Pogo]

Robert E Lee was very pro-black.

It's more interesting that he was anti-Confederate monument.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Robert E Lee was very pro-black.

I hope you were being sarcastic.

Nope. Dead serious.

Jackson, a man who, before the war, defied his neighbors to start a Sunday school for blacks; who broke Virginia law by teaching slaves and free blacks to read; and who saved slaves from being sold into the Deep South. (Virginians, such as General-to-be Robert Rodes, were appalled by the treatment of slaves in the Cotton Belt.)

https://nypost.com/2017/10/31/kelly-is-right-about-robert-e-lee/

Not every soldier, not every general, was fighting for slavery.

Activists beware: Today, you remove the statues others cherish, but tomorrow the statues you revere may go.

 

[Asclepias]

Robert E Lee was very pro-black.

I hope you were being sarcastic.

Nope. Dead serious.

Jackson, a man who, before the war, defied his neighbors to start a Sunday school for blacks; who broke Virginia law by teaching slaves and free blacks to read; and who saved slaves from being sold into the Deep South. (Virginians, such as General-to-be Robert Rodes, were appalled by the treatment of slaves in the Cotton Belt.)

Isnt claiming Lee was pro Black kind of like me claiming to be pro carbon dioxide but continuing to breath oxygen?

What does Jackson and Robert Rhodes have to do with Lee?

 

[Marion Morrison]

So how many generations has your family been in America?

Since the early 1700's

That doesn't count generations, dumbass. No wonder you're on a city lot with a mortgage instead of 320 acres, living like The Cartwrights n shit. You're too damn dumb.

Who told you that? Still mad you got caught in the Black confederate lie huh?

So how many head you runnin', bro?

Not everyone wants to be a cowboy slick.

So what's your grand scheme to make money? I'd say it worked better for Ye Olde black family neighbors than any other black person I've even seen or known, personally. Even my friend that can bench like..505 and just bought a 1/2 million dollar house.

Ol' farmer man has it goin' on much better. He mows his own grass, too.