LGBT Staff Won't Serve Christians

I have no doubt the so-called bible-compliant bakery would have baked adulterer Donald Trump's third wedding cake.

Their hatred of gays is not faith-based.

Actually the baker in question won't even make Halloween cakes because of his Religious beliefs.
 
My position is what the SC seems to be leaning toward: you should accommodate people but you cannot force messages or artistic endeavors. In other words, you should not put a sign on your door that says, "we do not serve gays" or whatever. But if you do not want to use your time and talents to support gay WEDDINGS, or photograph gay WEDDINGS, you should have that right.

In this case, it would seem the staff was required to serve a Christian EVENT, so the same would apply. They should not have to serve it, by law. But now will the same faction that wanted to force the baker and photographer to work say the same for these servers??? Shouldn't they be FORCED to serve it?

Over to you, Leftists
If a hateful bigot has to bake a cake for gays, then a LGBTQ restaurant has to serve Christians.

Simple.
 
The restaurant has a right not to serve

But canceling just 90 minutes before the event the godless perverts owe the Christians some compensation

Say double their money back?

If it's a reserved room not part of the public part of the restaurant? Then yes.

If it's just a group of them sitting in the PA part of the restaurant? then no.
 
Waiting to hear from those I know wanted to force the baker to "bake the cake".....
The bakers should bake the cake. The restaurant should take the reservation.

Everyone should keep their opinions about how other people live their lives to themselves.

What the hell is wrong with us that we think we need to get involved in that? It’s super easy.
 
The bakers should bake the cake. The restaurant should take the reservation.

Everyone should keep their opinions about how other people live their lives to themselves.

What the hell is wrong with us that we think we need to get involved in that? It’s super easy.

How about we make you attend Church?

Or make a Jewish deli sell pork?

The crazy involvement is thinking use of government force over chickenshit like this is the right way to handle it.
 
If anyone is paying attention to the court, the baker is definitely not going to have to bake the cake because they’re going to protect their religious rights.

But the restaurant would never win a case discriminating against their religion in the same court.

There is a double standard. Religion is extra special protected and overrides all other rights.
 
How about we make you attend Church?

Or make a Jewish deli sell pork?

The crazy involvement is thinking use of government force over chickenshit like this is the right way to handle it.
That makes no sense.

A Jewish deli doesn’t sell pork to anyone. You can’t make the deli sell a product against their will. You can only make them sell whatever they do sell to people regardless of who they are.
 
The current ACLU only supports left wing causes, or some token right wing causes that don't interfere with left wing practices.

Dershowitz: The ACLU is Dead
The ACLU has always been left leaning. I can't think of a single time in their history they took a case to defend the Second Amendment.

But they are big on the First Amendment.

Dershowitz is one of Trump's lawyers. He's also Harvey Weinstein's lawyer. And Epstein's lawyer.

He's an attention whore and a hack.
 
If you don't want to bake a cake or serve someone, that is your right......your employer can then fire you and hire someone who will serve their customers....if you own a business, you can work for whoever you want.......forcing people to work for you is slavery.



Except that in this case, a contract for service was established and reneged on at the last minute, for reasons that are unacceptable.

It would be no different than contracting to cater a BBQ, and then pulling the plug at the last minute because you found out a bunch of faggots would be there. After a contract is signed, you're stuck. You shouldn't be forced to sign if you know in advance a bunch of deviant freaks would be there.
 
That makes no sense.

A Jewish deli doesn’t sell pork to anyone. You can’t make the deli sell a product against their will. You can only make them sell whatever they do sell to people regardless of who they are.

Meat is meat, like Marriage is Marriage.
 
The ACLU has always been left leaning. I can't think of a single time in their history they took a case to defend the Second Amendment.

But they are big on the First Amendment.

Dershowitz is one of Trump's lawyers. He's also Harvey Weinstein's lawyer. And Epstein's lawyer.

He's an attention whore and a hack.

They aren't anymore.

Letter: The ACLU has lost its way

, Wendy Kaminer leaked a memo to the Wall Street Journal in which the ACLU said they will no longer defend speech that’s contrary to their broader goals. The ACLU caved to an angry mob. Money and partisanship are more important to them than freedom of speech.
 
The problem is the media. They twist things and then idiots run with it. The Christian baker did not refuse to serve queers. He refused to decorate the cake in the manner they demanded. He was more than happy to sell them a cake.
 
That makes no sense.

A Jewish deli doesn’t sell pork to anyone. You can’t make the deli sell a product against their will. You can only make them sell whatever they do sell to people regardless of who they are.

He was being facetious.
 
A cake is a cake. They’re not asking for any product that they don’t serve to other people.

You need to work on your analogies.

Then go force a jewish deli to make you a ham sandwich.

Actually the baker never refused point of sale cakes, just contracted ones for one specific event against their moral code, but my analogy was just to show the idiocy of your equating SSM with traditional marriage like the two aren't different.
 

Forum List

Back
Top