"Likely to weaponize intelligence": Experts alarmed as Trump poised to get security briefings again

[bigrebnc1775]

I don't blame them. He should not get access to classified material until the document case is settled, and if he loses, not even then.

It hasn't stopped Biden from having his classified briefings

 

[White 6]

As the Republican candidate, if he rates classified briefings, then he should get them just like any other candidate would. We're you a presidential candidate?

Nope, just a participant in need to know briefings, though have generated info for classified briefings, as well as personally briefing on secure links, to both sides of the pond.

Why don't you write the NSA a letter of your concerns. With your past clearances, I am sure they will snap to.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Fight fight fight

Even when you have nothing to say and no argument

The Trump way

Why should we argue with idiots like you. Everything you've been told has come to pass.
Say trump will be president in 2025

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why should we argue with idiots like you. Everything you've been told has come to pass.
Say trump will be president in 2025

The is bizarre grandstanding. I'm thinking your posts are meant for yourself.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It is really sad that you swallow that hook line and sinker. Sad still, is that so many people are going to the polls today who also buy that kind of nonsense.

‘During Trump's prior administration, there were instances of individuals reportedly withholding information from him. However, what's more significant is the potential for a second Trump administration to influence intelligence information or to have individuals within the hierarchy, altering information to prevent Trump from being upset.

“One of the problems with intelligence with a president like Donald Trump is that he's very likely to want to get intelligence that confirms what he believes or to change intelligence information towards the arguments that he wants to make,” Nichols said. “We've heard reporting about how many [individuals] in his first administration didn't want to upset him by bringing him contradictory information.”’

 

[Hollie]

“Former President Donald Trump is set to receive national security intelligence briefings once he secures the Republican nomination despite being indicted on charges that he mishandled classified materials after leaving office.”

Experts alarmed as Trump poised to get security briefings again

Scholar worries Trump could “very easily endanger the lives of individuals in the intelligence apparatus.”

www.salon.com

Subject to 31 charges under the Espionage Act and having committed treasonous, historic crimes: attempting to overturn a presidential election, disenfranchise millions of Americans, and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, it would be unmitigated madness to allow Trump any access to intelligence or security information.

A long, tedious cut and paste from an internet tabloid.

 

[Leo123]

“Former President Donald Trump is set to receive national security intelligence briefings once he secures the Republican nomination despite being indicted on charges that he mishandled classified materials after leaving office.”

Experts alarmed as Trump poised to get security briefings again

Scholar worries Trump could “very easily endanger the lives of individuals in the intelligence apparatus.”

www.salon.com

Subject to 31 charges under the Espionage Act and having committed treasonous, historic crimes: attempting to overturn a presidential election, disenfranchise millions of Americans, and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, it would be unmitigated madness to allow Trump any access to intelligence or security information.

What crime has Trump committed?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The is bizarre grandstanding. I'm thinking your posts are meant for yourself.

Ok Mr. States have a right to remove someone from its election ballot because of the 14th amendment sec. 3.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What crime has Trump committed?

Breathing

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ok Mr. States have a right to remove someone from its election ballot because of the 14th amendment sec. 3.

I never said that.

I said the Constitution does not explicitly prohibit it. Which is true.

But the SCOTUS now has. Which is why the scotus exists. If every possible configuration of reality were delineated in the constitution, we would not need a SCOTUS.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What crime has Trump committed?

Do not feed the sealions.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I never said that.

I said the Constitution does not explicitly prohibit it. Which is true.

But the SCOTUS now has. Which is why the scotus exists. If every possible configuration of reality were delineated in the constitution, we would not need a SCOTUS.

Always it's I never said that after the truth comes out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Always it's I never said that after the truth comes out.

Yeah, you probably hear that a lot, because you make stuff up about other people a lot.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yeah, you probably hear that a lot, because you make stuff up about other people a lot.

Next up fani and her indictment are going bye bye

 

[Leo123]

Next up fani and her indictment are going bye bye

Our tax dollars went up Fani’s fanny. She never had a case and is wasting our time.

 

[Hollie]

‘During Trump's prior administration, there were instances of individuals reportedly withholding information from him. However, what's more significant is the potential for a second Trump administration to influence intelligence information or to have individuals within the hierarchy, altering information to prevent Trump from being upset.

“One of the problems with intelligence with a president like Donald Trump is that he's very likely to want to get intelligence that confirms what he believes or to change intelligence information towards the arguments that he wants to make,” Nichols said. “We've heard reporting about how many [individuals] in his first administration didn't want to upset him by bringing him contradictory information.”’

It’s in good form to provide attribution to what you cut and paste.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Next up fani and her indictment are going bye bye

The indictment isn't going anywhere. Sorry. People don't toss out the decisions of multiple grand juries that lightly. And the head of the state board overseeing its prosecutors already said he would prosecute the case, if no other county picks it up. This is so the case is not delayed more by waiting on a change of guard in Fulton County.

Two other counties are already known to have the resources to pick it up.

There is your best case scenario. Which means, Trump's. Weird how the two are interchangeable.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The indictment isn't going anywhere. Sorry. People don't toss out the decisions of grand juries tha lightly. And the hea of the state board overseeing its prosecutors already said he would prosecute the case, if no other county picks it up. This is so the case is not delayed more by waiting on a collage of guard in Fulton County.

There is your best case scenario. Which means, Trump's. Weird how the two are interchangeable.

Yes it's gone bye bye

 

[Rawley]

I don't blame them. He should not get access to classified material until the document case is settled, and if he loses, not even then.

But Biden is fine. LOL

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes it's gone bye bye

Uh huh.