edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Your MessiahRushie has not posted the transcript yet, so I'm giving a running play by play.No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Why not post his remark, instead of just slandering him?
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Your MessiahRushie has not posted the transcript yet, so I'm giving a running play by play.No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Why not post his remark, instead of just slandering him?
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Why not post his remark, instead of just slandering him?
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.
Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.
There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
Why not post his remark, instead of just slandering him?
slandering rush?
heh... that's funny.
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.
Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.
There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.
Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.
Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.
There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.
Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.
Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.
There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.
Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.
The replies here speak for themselves. Rush is more successful so they attack him even though he is no different than their media heroes.
Once again success should be punished because of envy.