Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. You're still angry, and that is your only (paltry) defense.The blob said it was going to disappear like a miracle. Don’t you believe your lord and master!IOW, you're stupid enough to think that the virus will just die if we hide long enough.A good place to start is when there are no new cases.People who want the lockdowns to continue spend a lot of time shouting slogans and congratulating themselves on how they're "the only ones who care about saving lives", but I have yet to hear any of them tell us what their actual plan is for an endgame, or how they envision the future going forward if we were to cave in to their demands.
So I'd really like to know: if you could convince all the governors to continue the lockdowns, what do you think that looks like? How long do you want it to last, and/or what is your metric for ending it? And then what happens? What's your plan going forward from there? Do you have one?
You couldn't figure that out all by yourself? Wow!
Whatta fucking retard.
So your plan is to whine and bitch about one sentence months ago and to call Trump childish names? That's your whole fucking plan for dealing with coronavirus?
Just pointing out how batshit crazy your lord and master is.
Don't make me come back in here and whoop your candy ass... again.
What are you going to do? Huh? oh, I know, misquote me some more. It’s your only act.
Your blob signed off on every penny.
And he would have been a blob if he hadn't. Because you would be upset this rich blob ignored the poor and gave handouts to the rich.
Yeah, that's your line, little buddy.
Nope. You're still angry, and that is your only (paltry) defense.The blob said it was going to disappear like a miracle. Don’t you believe your lord and master!IOW, you're stupid enough to think that the virus will just die if we hide long enough.A good place to start is when there are no new cases.People who want the lockdowns to continue spend a lot of time shouting slogans and congratulating themselves on how they're "the only ones who care about saving lives", but I have yet to hear any of them tell us what their actual plan is for an endgame, or how they envision the future going forward if we were to cave in to their demands.
So I'd really like to know: if you could convince all the governors to continue the lockdowns, what do you think that looks like? How long do you want it to last, and/or what is your metric for ending it? And then what happens? What's your plan going forward from there? Do you have one?
You couldn't figure that out all by yourself? Wow!
Whatta fucking retard.
So your plan is to whine and bitch about one sentence months ago and to call Trump childish names? That's your whole fucking plan for dealing with coronavirus?
Just pointing out how batshit crazy your lord and master is.
Don't make me come back in here and whoop your candy ass... again.
What are you going to do? Huh? oh, I know, misquote me some more. It’s your only act.
I watch enough of the news cycle to notice when the guilty party has been caught in a lie, they resort to "I've been misquoted! I've been mistreated! Oh woe is me!"
Stop playing the victim. If anything, you are the victim of your own willful ignorance.
You know exactly what it is you want. Control. You want to hurt Trump, not cure the crisis we exist within.
Your blob signed off on every penny.
And he would have been a blob if he hadn't. Because you would be upset this rich blob ignored the poor and gave handouts to the rich.
Yeah, that's your line, little buddy.
It’s essentially what he did.
Okay. See you in 2024!I think we should let science guide us
That your blob botched the response is what has hurt him.
Possibly soProbably not so much that, but with how covid strains usually mutate.And the plan for the future is widespread testing. Nobody wants the lockdown to continue, but we also don't want a 2nd, more serious outbreak to overwhelm hospitals. We want people back to work and the ONLY safe way that can happen is through widespread testing. Surely you're not so much of raging bitch that doesn't permeate?You are full of bovine feces as usual. Quite a few people told you exactly when the lockdowns can end. It’s a very simple answer. TESTING.I just popped in on my lunch break to see if any lockdown proponents bothered to answer my questions, or if they all just came crowding in to scream slogans and tell us, "All I need to know is Orange Man Bad!"
So I guess that clears it up: there is no one supporting continued lockdowns who is doing so because they want to save lives. They just want a chance to attack Trump. That's it, that's all, and they haven't given a single thought to what the effects of their demands might be, because it doesn't matter to them.
You are full of bullshit as always. I didn't ASK, "When can lockdowns end?" I asked, "If you want the lockdowns to continue, tell me how that looks and what the plan is for that future?"
Is there ever going to be a point in your ignorant, cowardly life when you answer the question being asked instead of the question you WISH had been asked?more lefty fear mongeringNobody wants the lockdown to continue, but we also don't want a 2nd, more serious outbreak to overwhelm hospitals.
Kung Flu II will be less serious because so many of the weakest targets have already died and only the strong remain
I call it that just to annoy the communist dictatorship which does not yet have control over speech in America that it has in chinaBut when a person is ignorantly calling a virus the Chinese disease, there is no reason coming from that persons mind.
Those are the goals of the Cloward Piven Strategy. It was written in 1966. The democrats have been trying tPeople who want the lockdowns to continue spend a lot of time shouting slogans and congratulating themselves on how they're "the only ones who care about saving lives", but I have yet to hear any of them tell us what their actual plan is for an endgame, or how they envision the future going forward if we were to cave in to their demands.
So I'd really like to know: if you could convince all the governors to continue the lockdowns, what do you think that looks like? How long do you want it to last, and/or what is your metric for ending it? And then what happens? What's your plan going forward from there? Do you have one?
1) Defeat Trump
2) Crush the U.S. economy to create a new "Great Depression," and by Great, they mean a Great Crisis they will not let go to waste.
3) Use the Chinese Virus to bankrupt as many hospitals as possible and put as many Doctors and Nurses out of work as possible...creating the health care crisis they need to push total government control over the healthcare system.
4) Use the destruction of the U.S. economy and the healthcare system to create a malleable U.S. population who will be more willing to allow the democrat party to enact socialist policies......these policies will make sure that the U.S. is no longer the worlds Super Power and will allow the other countries of the world to have more power and control over U.S. policy....
There......right off the top of my head I think I covered all the bases...
You are preaching to the wrong crowdYes people are going to die from starvation. Probably not in America because we are blessed, but around the world, hell yeah. Especially in Northern Africa where out of control locust swarms have decimated their farms. They were relying on other countries for aid, but everyone’s food production is dropping.No one is going to die of starvation. But when a person is ignorantly calling a virus the Chinese disease, there is no reason coming from that persons mind.Better to be afraid of the chinese disease without cause than to die of starvation in lib nirvanaAnybody who thinks the economy can be fully productive when people are scared to go to work because they could get sick or die is high as balls and hallucinating.And only around 46.8 million of the most unhealthy people are looking at death from covid, vs the 3x that amount, 250 million, infants to elderly, are looking at starving to death. 68 million in this country alone are looking at crippling unemployment.250 million people world wide are going to be starving if we don’t get our food supply flowing like it was before the lockdown. How long do you expect to keep grandparents away from their grandkids? This is no where near as simple as you claim it to be.No one is a fan of the lockdowns. Some people just love their mothers, fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers and are not eager to sacrifice them to President Trump's reelection campaign.
7.8 billion people world wide are looking at a pandemic right now. We might want to end that first.
And that's just our country. Anyone who thinks the US economy can collapse without taking every other country with it is high as balls and hallucinating.
If you don't want to see your elderly relatives die, then keep then inside. Don't tell the rest of us we can't go to work.It’s these stupid people who don’t know wtf they’re talking about, that demand government preform a show for them, so they can “feel” safer. They don’t understand the limits of testing. They don’t understand what happens when one size fits all changes from “up top” get placed onto highly complicated and immensely intertwined systems. And they don’t understand that what they stupidly deem “unnecessary” is part of an incredibly complex and intertwined system that they rely upon, and the ones who feel the hurt from that disruption of the system are the MOST needy among us.And the plan for the future is widespread testing. Nobody wants the lockdown to continue, but we also don't want a 2nd, more serious outbreak to overwhelm hospitals. We want people back to work and the ONLY safe way that can happen is through widespread testing. Surely you're not so much of raging bitch that doesn't permeate?You are full of bovine feces as usual. Quite a few people told you exactly when the lockdowns can end. It’s a very simple answer. TESTING.I just popped in on my lunch break to see if any lockdown proponents bothered to answer my questions, or if they all just came crowding in to scream slogans and tell us, "All I need to know is Orange Man Bad!"
So I guess that clears it up: there is no one supporting continued lockdowns who is doing so because they want to save lives. They just want a chance to attack Trump. That's it, that's all, and they haven't given a single thought to what the effects of their demands might be, because it doesn't matter to them.
You are full of bullshit as always. I didn't ASK, "When can lockdowns end?" I asked, "If you want the lockdowns to continue, tell me how that looks and what the plan is for that future?"
Is there ever going to be a point in your ignorant, cowardly life when you answer the question being asked instead of the question you WISH had been asked?
So your answer is, "We continue the lockdowns until testing"? That's it? What does that even MEAN? Does it mean we keep the whole country locked down until a test for the coronavirus is invented? Got that. Does it mean we keep the whole country locked down until antibody testing is invented? Got that. Until X number of people are tested for having it, or for having had it? What's the number? How long would that take? And what does the world look like in the meantime? And what does that actually do for us? And, most importantly, once your metric - whatever it is - is met, THEN what happens?
Surely you're not so bitter that I see you for the pretentious halfwit you are that you can't understand the questions being asked.
Essentially all we needed to do here was stop all visitation to nursing homes, and step up PPE and sanitation procedures at nursing homes. Not that that would’ve have prevented all death, but it would’ve been by far the most effective way to do so. I was a person ringing the bell on this loudly a month before many of these twats took covid seriously. I’m an RN at very large hospital. We’re just a couple of hours outside of NYC. I’m seeing what’s happening on the ground in real time. It is not as bad as we thought. The people we see getting rocked by covid are almost all 80 year old diabetics, with congestive heart failure or something else of the sort going. I’m probably more jaded to death in the elderly than most, but I’m just looking at this whole situation in its entirety.
Politicians never let a good disaster go to waste.
That aside, people still don't want to see their elderly relatives die.
I agree re old folks' homes.
If you don't want to see your elderly relatives die, then keep then inside. Don't tell the rest of us we can't go to work.
There's no reason coming from the mind of a callous self centered asshole who has no problem wacthing people losing everything they own because of this insane shutdown.No one is going to die of starvation. But when a person is ignorantly calling a virus the Chinese disease, there is no reason coming from that persons mind.Better to be afraid of the chinese disease without cause than to die of starvation in lib nirvanaAnybody who thinks the economy can be fully productive when people are scared to go to work because they could get sick or die is high as balls and hallucinating.And only around 46.8 million of the most unhealthy people are looking at death from covid, vs the 3x that amount, 250 million, infants to elderly, are looking at starving to death. 68 million in this country alone are looking at crippling unemployment.250 million people world wide are going to be starving if we don’t get our food supply flowing like it was before the lockdown. How long do you expect to keep grandparents away from their grandkids? This is no where near as simple as you claim it to be.No one is a fan of the lockdowns. Some people just love their mothers, fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers and are not eager to sacrifice them to President Trump's reelection campaign.
7.8 billion people world wide are looking at a pandemic right now. We might want to end that first.
And that's just our country. Anyone who thinks the US economy can collapse without taking every other country with it is high as balls and hallucinating.
Especially since the dipshit doesn’t even live here.If you don't want to see your elderly relatives die, then keep then inside. Don't tell the rest of us we can't go to work.It’s these stupid people who don’t know wtf they’re talking about, that demand government preform a show for them, so they can “feel” safer. They don’t understand the limits of testing. They don’t understand what happens when one size fits all changes from “up top” get placed onto highly complicated and immensely intertwined systems. And they don’t understand that what they stupidly deem “unnecessary” is part of an incredibly complex and intertwined system that they rely upon, and the ones who feel the hurt from that disruption of the system are the MOST needy among us.And the plan for the future is widespread testing. Nobody wants the lockdown to continue, but we also don't want a 2nd, more serious outbreak to overwhelm hospitals. We want people back to work and the ONLY safe way that can happen is through widespread testing. Surely you're not so much of raging bitch that doesn't permeate?You are full of bovine feces as usual. Quite a few people told you exactly when the lockdowns can end. It’s a very simple answer. TESTING.I just popped in on my lunch break to see if any lockdown proponents bothered to answer my questions, or if they all just came crowding in to scream slogans and tell us, "All I need to know is Orange Man Bad!"
So I guess that clears it up: there is no one supporting continued lockdowns who is doing so because they want to save lives. They just want a chance to attack Trump. That's it, that's all, and they haven't given a single thought to what the effects of their demands might be, because it doesn't matter to them.
You are full of bullshit as always. I didn't ASK, "When can lockdowns end?" I asked, "If you want the lockdowns to continue, tell me how that looks and what the plan is for that future?"
Is there ever going to be a point in your ignorant, cowardly life when you answer the question being asked instead of the question you WISH had been asked?
So your answer is, "We continue the lockdowns until testing"? That's it? What does that even MEAN? Does it mean we keep the whole country locked down until a test for the coronavirus is invented? Got that. Does it mean we keep the whole country locked down until antibody testing is invented? Got that. Until X number of people are tested for having it, or for having had it? What's the number? How long would that take? And what does the world look like in the meantime? And what does that actually do for us? And, most importantly, once your metric - whatever it is - is met, THEN what happens?
Surely you're not so bitter that I see you for the pretentious halfwit you are that you can't understand the questions being asked.
Essentially all we needed to do here was stop all visitation to nursing homes, and step up PPE and sanitation procedures at nursing homes. Not that that would’ve have prevented all death, but it would’ve been by far the most effective way to do so. I was a person ringing the bell on this loudly a month before many of these twats took covid seriously. I’m an RN at very large hospital. We’re just a couple of hours outside of NYC. I’m seeing what’s happening on the ground in real time. It is not as bad as we thought. The people we see getting rocked by covid are almost all 80 year old diabetics, with congestive heart failure or something else of the sort going. I’m probably more jaded to death in the elderly than most, but I’m just looking at this whole situation in its entirety.
Politicians never let a good disaster go to waste.
That aside, people still don't want to see their elderly relatives die.
I agree re old folks' homes.
Your blob signed off on every penny.
And he would have been a blob if he hadn't. Because you would be upset this rich blob ignored the poor and gave handouts to the rich.
Yeah, that's your line, little buddy.
It’s essentially what he did.
You can't have it both ways dumbass.
Okay. See you in 2024!I think we should let science guide us
That your blob botched the response is what has hurt him.
Oh? And Biden would have aced it? Naw, he would have let more infected Chinese flights come into the country before he shut it down.
I didn’t dumbass. I’m not voting for your blob.
I didn’t dumbass. I’m not voting for your blob.
I never suggested you should. Vote for whoever you want.
But you can't criticize him for spending on the stimulus checks and have a premade talking point ready to blame him for not doing anything.
You're too easy.
And? What impact did that have on you, specifically?He did bail out multi-million dollar corporations.
He did bail out the Los Angeles Lakers.
He did authorize sending tons of medical supplies to China ... He did tell the States that the stockpile as "our" stockpile.
A Democratic group’s ad attacking President Donald Trump leaves the misleading impression that medical equipment donated by U.S.-based organizations and businesses to China early in the global coronavirus outbreak came from the Trump administration.
“He shipped China 17 tons of American masks and medical supplies,” says the ad from American Bridge 21st Century, a liberal super PAC, referring to Trump. “Our masks and supplies. Supplies we need now.”
It’s true the State Department was involved in delivering to China tons of personal protective equipment donated by American companies and organizations in early February. The State Department even lauded the donations as “a testament to the generosity of the American people,” and said they were an example of “strong U.S. leadership in response to the outbreak.”
But the medical supplies were not “American” or “ours” in the sense that they belonged to the federal government, which the ad’s language may lead viewers to believe. The equipment was donated by those companies and organizations specifically for use by health care workers in China.
www.factcheck.org
He did call the virus a hoax.
Trump did use the word “hoax” but his full comments, and subsequent explanation, make clear he was talking about Democratic attacks on his administration’s handling of the outbreak, not the virus itself.
www.factcheck.org
Who wouldn't be? This is government trying to help people in a time of crisis, but we can't keep doing it and doing it.What the grotesque bitch did was criticize the spending. What the grotesque bitch will do is vote for the blob who authorized every penny of the spending.
None. Neither did slavery, the internment of Japanese Americans, the Tuskegee Experiment or the death of Elvis. I can state that they were all terrible things though. As was the blob sending money to Wall Street instead of Main Street.And? What impact did that have on you, specifically?He did bail out multi-million dollar corporations.
Again, you are either drunk or high.He did bail out the Los Angeles Lakers.
Yeah? And? There are ushers and ticket takers and concession stand workers that are employed by them. Or do they not count?
He did authorize sending tons of medical supplies to China ... He did tell the States that the stockpile as "our" stockpile.
No, he did not.
A Democratic group’s ad attacking President Donald Trump leaves the misleading impression that medical equipment donated by U.S.-based organizations and businesses to China early in the global coronavirus outbreak came from the Trump administration.
“He shipped China 17 tons of American masks and medical supplies,” says the ad from American Bridge 21st Century, a liberal super PAC, referring to Trump. “Our masks and supplies. Supplies we need now.”
It’s true the State Department was involved in delivering to China tons of personal protective equipment donated by American companies and organizations in early February. The State Department even lauded the donations as “a testament to the generosity of the American people,” and said they were an example of “strong U.S. leadership in response to the outbreak.”
But the medical supplies were not “American” or “ours” in the sense that they belonged to the federal government, which the ad’s language may lead viewers to believe. The equipment was donated by those companies and organizations specifically for use by health care workers in China.
FactChecking Ad About Donating 'Our Masks and Supplies' to China - FactCheck.org
A Democratic group’s ad attacking President Donald Trump leaves the misleading impression that medical equipment donated by U.S.-based organizations and businesses to China early in the global coronavirus outbreak came from the Trump administration.
He did call it a hoax.He did not call the virus a hoax:He did call the virus a hoax.
Trump did use the word “hoax” but his full comments, and subsequent explanation, make clear he was talking about Democratic attacks on his administration’s handling of the outbreak, not the virus itself.
Democratic Ad Twists Trump's 'Hoax' Comment - FactCheck.org
The Democratic super PAC Priorities USA Action has been running an ad falsely suggesting President Donald Trump called the coronavirus outbreak a "hoax."
You really are gullible aren't you?
