Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
If releasing this conversation was on the up and up, why did they initially redact her husband's name as the person she was talking to?
The fact it was her husband puts the conversation in a completely different context, and you know it.
Maybe because, unlike you, they understand the fucking law makes it illegal to mention the name of the recipient of an email if the recipient is not in the government. Everyone knew the email was to a a private person, so the fact that it is her husband that received it only matters to fucking idiots. The emails show her personal bias, which is the entire fucking point here. All you are doing is attempting to make yourself look even dumber than you are.
Trust me, you can't look any dumber than you already have.
ONly people who look kind of dumb here are the ones trying to take some electronic pillow talk and make it a felony.
Electronic pillow talk? Felony?
What the fuck are you babbling about now?