Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah...fuck the Constitution. Let's go ahead, and have a full on dictatorship, and due away with that traitorous Congress while we're at it, right?!?!?How about this: Arrest that shithead district judge and make him or her wear a pink jumpsuit and eat green bologna sammiches.
That would work for me. While he's at it, Trump should have the whole Ninth Circuit Court taken into custody.
They already had a hearing, Hawk. All the things you are talking about were already determined by the court. That is not the actual wording of the Court Order, either, I'd bet a nickel.Well, hey! I'm sure this hearing will be short, and uneventful, then. Why so angry?By the way, can any of you libtards explain how Arpaio ever violated the court order? What day did he break the law and who was the victim of his "crimes"?
I see you can't answer the question.
Now, how could Sheriff Arpaio, or all his deputies, comply with such a vague order. "Don't arrest people that are here illegally". If they are breaking the law by being here illegally, then local law enforcement can and should arrest the person. A judge cannot order law enforcement to not enforce the laws.
Thats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
Read and try to comprehend the OP. As usual your bias clouds your ability to understand (believe me, I'm being kind).
The rest of her rant was utter nonsense, she is claiming the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office was discriminating, yet were any such charges ever brought up against the County Sheriff's Office? Was there ever any criminal conviction? No, there wasn't. It was just her stupid, uninformed, libtard opinion that the Sheriff's Office was "racist", and she was going to abuse her authority and try to tell them to stop arresting any and all Latinos who were breaking the law by being in the country illegally.
They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
Read and try to comprehend the OP. As usual your bias clouds your ability to understand (believe me, I'm being kind).
The rest of her rant was utter nonsense, she is claiming the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office was discriminating, yet were any such charges ever brought up against the County Sheriff's Office? Was there ever any criminal conviction? No, there wasn't. It was just her stupid, uninformed, libtard opinion that the Sheriff's Office was "racist", and she was going to abuse her authority and try to tell them to stop arresting any and all Latinos who were breaking the law by being in the country illegally.
She should be jailed for obstruction of upholding federal law.
They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
Read and try to comprehend the OP. As usual your bias clouds your ability to understand (believe me, I'm being kind).
The rest of her rant was utter nonsense, she is claiming the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office was discriminating, yet were any such charges ever brought up against the County Sheriff's Office? Was there ever any criminal conviction? No, there wasn't. It was just her stupid, uninformed, libtard opinion that the Sheriff's Office was "racist", and she was going to abuse her authority and try to tell them to stop arresting any and all Latinos who were breaking the law by being in the country illegally.
She should be jailed for obstruction of upholding federal law.
She should be disbarred as well.
I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Contempt is a local issue. It isnt against "the united states"I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
Contempt is a local issue. It isnt against "the united states"I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
Thats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
so, you are saying contempt is a crime against the united states? I guess its possible. Can you explain that to me?Contempt is a local issue. It isnt against "the united states"I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
In a Federal court? Try again.
I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
so, you are saying contempt is a crime against the united states? I guess its possible. Can you explain that to me?Contempt is a local issue. It isnt against "the united states"I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOYou're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
In a Federal court? Try again.
Thats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
No not true, he arrested people due to how they looked. Him and his posse, even when told to quit, he continued.
I really dont know the whole story. I just know he was charged with contempt, and contempt is an exception. IMOThats for "crimes against the United States" contempt involves local doesnt it?They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
You're right, Arpaio never actually committed any crime against the United States, he arrested people that were committing crimes against the United States.
Obama pardoned drug users, were their crimes "against the United States"?
Not according to the constitution.
They might arrest you for how you look, how would you like that? Pull you over and write you a ticket for being too white.
fyi- he can give a pardon for federal cases only....They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
fyi- he can give a pardon for federal cases only....They don't need to file any such "memo" just because some butt hurt liberal judge says so. The US Constitution clearly gives the President authority to grant a pardon for any reason and for any crime, except impeachment.
so lets say the State of Arizona decided to charge Arpaio with a state crime, has a trial, he's found guilty of breaking this State law, then President Trump could not pardon him.
