MAGA 2020 Supporter Causes BLM Mural To Be Removed By City.

" The city did not respond but promptly removed the Black Lives Matter mural, the news outlet said. They said the sign was a traffic hazard and might cause accidents."

And I would add to that, painting murals on the street is especially hazardous to bicyclists and motorcyclists.
 
Will the mural in NY go away soon or will a group of Trump supporters place a nice MAGA 2020 mural in front of DeBlasio's and Cuomos homes?

November is going to be such fun...

I doubt they could put a MAGA mural up. That is political advertising.

They made their point with BLM...time for it to go.

BLM is political advertising.

No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.

There is a group Black Lives Matter.

and the slogan is 100% owned by the left, and thus the Democrats.

Nice try.
 
Will the mural in NY go away soon or will a group of Trump supporters place a nice MAGA 2020 mural in front of DeBlasio's and Cuomos homes?

November is going to be such fun...

I doubt they could put a MAGA mural up. That is political advertising.

They made their point with BLM...time for it to go.

BLM is political advertising.

No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.

There is a group Black Lives Matter.

and the slogan is 100% owned by the left, and thus the Democrats.

Nice try.

It is a slogan also independent of the group. Ait isn’t “owned” by any political party. When the Dems churning out Biden BLM hats and signs, let me know. Otherwise your argument is fraudulent.
 
Will the mural in NY go away soon or will a group of Trump supporters place a nice MAGA 2020 mural in front of DeBlasio's and Cuomos homes?

November is going to be such fun...

I doubt they could put a MAGA mural up. That is political advertising.

They made their point with BLM...time for it to go.

BLM is political advertising.

No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.

There is a group Black Lives Matter.

and the slogan is 100% owned by the left, and thus the Democrats.

Nice try.

It is a slogan also independent of the group. Ait isn’t “owned” by any political party. When the Dems churning out Biden BLM hats and signs, let me know. Otherwise your argument is fraudulent.
Nice try at spinning this...

Tell us again why your democrats are out painting their messages on the streets?
 
Public support is turning against them and the Democrats as the lawlessness continues..
Is it?

You KNOW it is. You have:
  • Airhead support from people who mindlessly put BLM signs in their yard because they're just behind any fad that sounds good.
  • Official Media promotion of the organization as a fake front to exaggerate the effect and suppress the bad in a fake image to the public..
  • Then you have the REAL OPINIONS of the actual publc who largely stay silent but whom are F@*cking SICK & TIRED of having their lives, safety and businesses all disrupted while hearing of another riot, another violent confrontation, seeing cities looted, defaced and burned and historic statues all senselessly toppled by a bunch of snotnose idiots every night on the evening news who don't even know what or why they are there, and want an end put to it.
 
Actually, we do. Don't flatter yourself. Boi...
Enlighten me.








Watch any of the inumerable videos of antifart pussies getting their asses kicked.
They are only dangerous in large gangs, and even then they lose more than they win.

You are really tough against statues, old people and children though.
That ain’t me. Nice try tho, boi.






Sure it is, you antifart types are all the same.
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.
 
Public support is turning against them and the Democrats as the lawlessness continues..
Is it?

You KNOW it is. You have:
  • Airhead support from people who mindlessly put BLM signs in their yard because they're just behind any fad that sounds good.
  • Official Media promotion of the organization as a fake front to exaggerate the effect and suppress the bad in a fake image to the public..
  • Then you have the REAL OPINIONS of the actual publc who largely stay silent but whom are F@*cking SICK & TIRED of having their lives, safety and businesses all disrupted while hearing of another riot, another violent confrontation, seeing cities looted, defaced and burned and historic statues all senselessly toppled by a bunch of snotnose idiots every night on the evening news who don't even know what or why they are there, and want an end put to it.
So you are this all on a theoretical silent majority?
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

No.

It isn't.

 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

It's also associated with a Movement, just like Black Lives Matter.

sorry, but once government allows a political message on public property, it has to allow others and not discriminate based on content.

Let's make it similar, should NYC be required to allow a "Blue Lives Matter" mural to be put on the Street?
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

Except for when it isn't.
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

Except for when it isn't.

It is a trademarked political slogan for a political candidate. There is no argument there unless you want to get sued. This is a losing argument.

You CAN make a LEGITIMATE argument about why Black Lives Matter should not be painted on public property with taxpayer money, and I would probably agree, but to make it comparable to a political slogan is just...dumb.
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

It's also associated with a Movement, just like Black Lives Matter.

sorry, but once government allows a political message on public property, it has to allow others and not discriminate based on content.

Let's make it similar, should NYC be required to allow a "Blue Lives Matter" mural to be put on the Street?

And THAT is comparable. It isn’t a political message. And answer is yes.

Political campaigns are not the same as movements Particularly when it comes to public property and taxpayer money.
 
BLM is political advertising.
No. It is a slogan independent of any political party or candidate.


And MAGA isn't?

No.

MAGA was and is the political slogan for the Trump campaign, there is no question there.


It is entirely associated with a political campaign.

It's also associated with a Movement, just like Black Lives Matter.

sorry, but once government allows a political message on public property, it has to allow others and not discriminate based on content.

Let's make it similar, should NYC be required to allow a "Blue Lives Matter" mural to be put on the Street?

And THAT is comparable. It isn’t a political message. And answer is yes.

Political campaigns are not the same as movements Particularly when it comes to public property and taxpayer money.

They are all political messages. I'm sure progressives would be fine with "Hope" which was an Obama slogan.

Political campaigns are political speech.
 

Forum List

Back
Top