Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Words have meaning. And, why do you care, exactly? The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
lol. You mean I didn't dumb it down enough for the right-wing, but y'all still want to be Right.
explain how that makes UE insurance unconstitutionplease.That means requiring Cause in an at-will employment State is extra-Constitutional.
Do right-wingers really believe they are being honest?
you haven’t explained how.That means requiring Cause in an at-will employment State is extra-Constitutional.
Do right-wingers really believe they are being honest?
yes anyone can apply for a jobEvery State should be a right-to-work State so anyone wanting off welfare or tired of being unemployed can simply apply for a job and have a, right-to-work.
do you not understand that NO ONE ELSE believes you? I've challenged you to produce anyone who does and you failed. No one believes you.I understand the issue. Y'all keep proving y'all prefer ignorance to facts.
And there you go again, insisting there's some mythical linkage between the two. Again, you're the ONLY one who thinks there is.At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."
Oh, good grief. Now you're dragging the First Amendment into it. It has nothing to do with UC law. If you think it does, you're the ONLY one who believes that.You have no ethics or morals to claim that. We have a First Amendment. The Law is the Law. Employment is at-will not for-cause. It really is that simple.
It's just a flesh wound! So you're going to run away eh? Come back here and I'll bite you to death!It is so funny to watch Dan get his ass kicked and he is to dense to even know how badly it has been kicked.
And that's where it becomes a giant welfare program.What part of at-will is limited to some specific time frame? I am not saying the employer has to pay all of it.
he’s just a typical dembot that doesn’t understand or know anything but thinks he does, and is too closed minded to be educated.do you not understand that NO ONE ELSE believes you? I've challenged you to produce anyone who does and you failed. No one believes you.
Lifetime.So, in addition to changing who is eligible, you want to change the source of the funding for unemployment compensation?
And you obviously want to change the length of time someone can draw unemployment compensation. How long would you suggest it be changed to? From 26 weeks to 52 weeks?
it’s not. The employer can fire someone at any time, if they are an “at-will” employeeWhat part of at-will is limited to some specific time frame? I am not saying the employer has to pay all of it.
Do you even understand what right-to-work means?Especially in Right-to-Work States?
He thinks it means you're guaranteed a job.yes anyone can apply for a job
no…he thinks it means your guaranteed unemployment insurance funding.He thinks it means you're guaranteed a job.
So much for the tradition and image of the Sturdy Maine Men of the backwoods, eh?not eating is a good thing! folks need to be skinny!
Maine’s passage of ‘right to food’ amendment stirs celebration, worry
While supporters are pleased, opponents fear the nation's first constitutional amendment for food rights will lead to legal battles.www.centralmaine.com
If you had better reading comprehension, you would know that tunnels could be used to transport fuels as well.Yes, it is all expensive. But the power transmission lines are far less expensive when built above ground in the typical aerial array. Why build something that would cost exponentially more?
At-will means something specific.So how long would you have them be able to draw unemployment compensation. Currently, most states allow 26 weeks. Would you double that to 52 weeks?
And as for why I care, you said in a previous post that the employers would not be paying for it. Which means the tax payers would have to pay for it. I am a tax payer.
lol. Your hypocrisy is standard, right-wing operating proceedure.LMAO!! Your hypocrisy is amazing. "...but y'all still want to be Right". You asked a question, which I answered. Then you argued with my answer. I based my answer on more than 2 decades of direct experience, and you argued based on watching a few YouTube videos. And you still insist you are right.
Where are you from?explain how that makes UE insurance unconstitutionplease.
you haven’t explained how.
