Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LMAO. Answer your own question dummy. If you want to edit out that one line, why haven't you or your pinhead media been able to publicize anything that you call incendiary except. "Go down there and fight", fight, fight. Damn, lady, are you going after any candidate that ever ran for any office and every coach and cheerleader in any high school in America. Quit grasping at straws.If you want to claim that this one line out of that entire blistering speech was edited out purposely, you are going to have a hard time explaining why 95% of the speech was left out with that one line.
The Jan 6 committee withheld thousands of hours of video and cherrypicked. Pelosi refused to deploy the protection Trump asked for. Pelosi cherrypicked the Jan 6 committee leaving out Trump supporters and favoring never-Trumpers.Why are you saying Pelosi, she was not on the 1/6 election subversion committee? Does it make your boogeyman man bigger than say, Liz Cheney or Adam K.?
The speech was over an hour long...1 hour and 10 minutes.
If you want to claim that this one line out of that entire blistering speech was edited out purposely, you are going to have a hard time explaining why 95% of the speech was left out with that one line.
LOGIC is that time was very limited during hearings and only a small part of the inciteful, nasty, lying speech/video was pulled out and absolutely no indication or impression was given that the full episode was shown.....
The full video, and full witness interviews and full documented evidence was put in to the final 1/6 Report for the public can see it all, if they want.
This is much to do about nothing that your handlers gave you guys for your daily outrage....
Not mindless when it's the truth. The American Left are the enemies of this country.Empty mindless insults that mean nothing.
Trump has not been charged for his 1/6 speech. So criminally, it matters naught.LMAO. Answer your own question dummy. If you want to edit out that one line, why haven't you or your pinhead media been able to publicize anything that you call incendiary except. "Go down there and fight", fight, fight. Damn, lady, are you going after any candidate that ever ran for any office and every coach and cheerleader in any high school in America. Quit grasping at straws.
Never Trumpers?The Jan 6 committee withheld thousands of hours of video and cherrypicked. Pelosi refused to deploy the protection Trump asked for. Pelosi cherrypicked the Jan 6 committee leaving out Trump supporters and favoring never-Trumpers.
How can you know that? Were you in his head? What you consider inciting is speech to thinking people. Keep grasping at your pearls. You still haven't answered my question about finding an impartial jury. You certainly would have to excuse yourself--would you?that were meant to be inciting
Impartial doesn't mean you have to love Trump or that you can't dislike Trump, it just means that despite your feelings of Trump that you can make a judgment on the facts of the case.How can you know that? Were you in his head? What you consider inciting is speech to thinking people. Keep grasping at your pearls. You still haven't answered my question about finding an impartial jury. You certainly would have to excuse yourself--would you?
Like I said, I was not the only one who saw it that way....most of your house and senate leadership believed it to be an inciting speech and prior to 1/6 comments of Trump's lead it To Be Wild....How can you know that? Were you in his head? What you consider inciting is speech to thinking people. Keep grasping at your pearls. You still haven't answered my question about finding an impartial jury. You certainly would have to excuse yourself--would you?
And it is clear that she---and you, could not be impartial jurors because you believe he is guilty regardless of the evidence to the contrary and the underhanded, unconstitutional and illegal tactics that the democrats are using to influence the next election. Ironic, that is exactly what you are accusing him of. Shades of Saul Alinsky--why am I not surprised.Impartial doesn't mean you have to love Trump or that you can't dislike Trump, it just means that despite your feelings of Trump that you can make a judgment on the facts of the case.
The key, as always, is independents.
Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: A majority think Donald Trump is being treated fairly and is guilty
POLITICO magazine: Lock Him Up? A New Poll Has Some Bad News for Trump A new POLITICO Magazine/Ipsos poll punctures some prevailing political narratives about the Trump indictments. A new ...www.dailykos.com
And it hasn't even been 72 hours since the surrender.
That Bingo stream on consciousness you just spouted at me doesn't mean shit you Simp. I'd love to see Trump go to jail but I can be partial about the evidence. The great thing is that we get to watch the Georgia trial live on TV so all these claims you're making get to be hashed out when that happens. I'm going to guess you refuse to accept any evidence the the prosecution presents. I on the other hand look forward to hearing what Trumps defense is.And it is clear that she---and you, could not be impartial jurors because you believe he is guilty regardless of the evidence to the contrary and the underhanded, unconstitutional and illegal tactics that the democrats are using to influence the next election. Ironic, that is exactly what you are accusing him of. Shades of Saul Alinsky--why am I not surprised.
Pelosi rejected Republicans who had questions about the committee and, she only chose two Republicans, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters to be seated on that committee. "Simp"Never Trumpers?
They interviewed people who worked in his administration for fucks sake, you Simp. How are people who worked in his administration, never-Trumpers?
Yeah...'Orange Man Bad' but I can be impartial'.......You crack me up LOLImpartial doesn't mean you have to love Trump or that you can't dislike Trump, it just means that despite your feelings of Trump that you can make a judgment on the facts of the case.
All the people the committee interviewed live on TV for you Simps to see for yourself worked in the Trump administration, you moron.Pelosi rejected Republicans who had questions about the committee and, she only chose two Republicans, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters to be seated on that committee. "Simp"
So they cherrypicked people to testify against Trump. Hutchinson is a good example, she outright lied. The committee was biased so their conclusion is shit no matter who they interviewed. You're such a Simp-Sheeple.All the people the committee interviewed live on TV for you Simps to see for yourself worked in the Trump administration, you moron.
Yeah, Hutchinson is a great example of how Simp your logic is. Despite working in the Trump administration you call her a never Trumper....So they cherrypicked people to testify against Trump. Hutchinson is a good example, she outright lied. The committee was biased so their conclusion is shit no matter who they interviewed. You're such a Simp-Sheeple.
So what? She lied didn't she Simp? Probably lied to get the job in the first place and then she flipped and lied again when Pelosi pressured her. You have so much hate for the man you believe liars.Yeah, Hutchinson is a great example of how Simp your logic is. Despite working in the Trump administration you call her a never Trumper....
Report for your grooming appointment at 8:00 AM Monday morning. Your cooperation is appreciated.Why are you saying Pelosi, she was not on the 1/6 election subversion committee? Does it make your boogeyman man bigger than say, Liz Cheney or Adam K.?
The speech was over an hour long...1 hour and 10 minutes.
If you want to claim that this one line out of that entire blistering speech was edited out purposely, you are going to have a hard time explaining why 95% of the speech was left out with that one line.
LOGIC is that time was very limited during hearings and only a small part of the inciteful, nasty, lying speech/video was pulled out and shown, and absolutely no indication or impression was given that the full episode was shown.....
The full video, and full witness interviews and full documented evidence was put in to the final 1/6 Report for the public can see it all, if they want.
This is much to do about nothing that your handlers gave you guys for your daily outrage....
The key, as always, is independents.
Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: A majority think Donald Trump is being treated fairly and is guilty
POLITICO magazine: Lock Him Up? A New Poll Has Some Bad News for Trump A new POLITICO Magazine/Ipsos poll punctures some prevailing political narratives about the Trump indictments. A new ...www.dailykos.com
And it hasn't even been 72 hours since the surrender.
Right. So a never Trumper can be someone who worked in Trumps administration but they're the liars, not you....So what? She lied didn't she Simp? Probably lied to get the job in the first place and then she flipped and lied again when Pelosi pressured her. You have so much hate for the man you believe liars.
