Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,529
- 2,239
Then you should know how Hilary feels. yet it doesn't matter one bit. Unless your the Don who acted upon his beliefs.The election was stolen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then you should know how Hilary feels. yet it doesn't matter one bit. Unless your the Don who acted upon his beliefs.The election was stolen
The only theft of 2016 was when the DNC stole the primary for HillaryThen you should know how Hilary feels. yet it doesn't matter one bit. Unless your the Don who acted upon his beliefs.
Their also was Russian interference directed at Clinton and favored Trump.The only theft of 2016 was when the DNC stole the primary for Hillary
You really are stupid. The Russians have attempted to influence EVERY US election since WWII and the cold war. Americans don't take part. My goodness, every time I think I've seen the top of democrat stupidity, someone like you comes along and proves me wrong.When Clinton ran for president their was Russian interference as payback.
As a patriot, I have confidence in our jury system, as well as in our democratic elections."... guilty of an alleged crime ..." ???
Without consideration of The Donald's legal defense, it's super easy to think he's guilty ... however, we need to stay within the Constitution and written law during this witch hunt ... we should try to not be guilty of the offenses we're charging the Man with ...
Nonsense. In the past Soviet Russia and Cuba had many sympathizers and apologists in the U.S.— mostly socialists, radicals, pacifists, communists, anti-imperialists and black radicals (because of Soviet & Cuban assistance to the anti-apartheid fight), etc.You really are stupid. The Russians have attempted to influence EVERY US election since WWII and the cold war. Americans don't take part. My goodness, every time I think I've seen the top of democrat stupidity, someone like you comes along and proves me wrong.
Read the second sentence of my post moron. Thanks for the confirmation on both of my points.Nonsense. In the past Soviet Russia and Cuba had many sympathizers and apologists in the U.S.— mostly socialists, radicals, pacifists, communists, anti-imperialists and black radicals (because of Soviet & Cuban assistance to the anti-apartheid fight), etc.
Now, after Russia has become conservative, religious, nationalist, but still remains authoritarian and anti-American, different sectors of U.S. society tend to buy its propaganda.
For years it has been common to see political attacks and conspiratorial memes start in RT and work their way into the extreme rightwing media, and from there into the private political obsessions of Trump cultists everywhere.
I read you whole comment. Read your 2nd and 3rd sentences carefully. Now you read again my first sentence and my whole comment. You are — as usual — acting as a “moron” and being unnecessarily insulting.Read the second sentence of my post moron. Thanks for the confirmation on both of my points.
The key, as always, is independents.
Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: A majority think Donald Trump is being treated fairly and is guilty
POLITICO magazine: Lock Him Up? A New Poll Has Some Bad News for Trump A new POLITICO Magazine/Ipsos poll punctures some prevailing political narratives about the Trump indictments. A new ...www.dailykos.com
And it hasn't even been 72 hours since the surrender.
You really are stupid. The Russians have attempted to influence EVERY US election since WWII and the cold war. Americans don't take part. My goodness, every time I think I've seen the top of democrat stupidity, someone like you comes along and proves me wrong.
How can you not realize how dumb and hypocritical your comment is. We are talking about OPINIONS here and not LEGAL GUILT.I think it's hilarious that you're too dumb to understand the irony in claiming someone is "guilty", before they've been given due process, while simultaneously claiming they are being treated "fairly".
Fair treatment in this country means innocence is presumed until proven otherwise.
Take your anti-civil rights bullshit and fuck off.
lol
What part of the Russians attempting to influence EVERY election since WWII and the cold war don't you understand. The Russians always have and always will attempt to put the most inept candidate into the WH. Sadly, until the advent of social media, they haven't been successful. Since social media, they have had tremendous success as the elections of Bush, Obama and Biden clearly show.So you believe that Russian interference happen in the Clinton/Trump race.
How can you not realize how dumb and hypocritical your comment is. We are talking about OPINIONS here and not LEGAL GUILT.
Doesn’t your side express its opinions as facts all the time? Don’t you all say Biden and Hillary are “guilty as sin”? Didn’t Trump lead his knucklehead base screaming “Lock her up!” — when there was not even a single indictment, let alone a trial and conviction of Hillary Clinton?
Indictments by the opposition prove nothing. To your point, don't two scam impeachments and acquittals and the failure of baseless investigations lead you to believe that there is an attempt by the democrats to politically assassinate Trump?How can you not realize how dumb and hypocritical your comment is. We are talking about OPINIONS here and not LEGAL GUILT.
Doesn’t your side express its opinions as facts all the time? Don’t you all say Biden and Hillary are “guilty as sin”? Didn’t Trump lead his knucklehead base screaming “Lock her up!” — when there was not even a single indictment, let alone a trial and conviction of Hillary Clinton?
I am not arguing you general observation just the obvious. You do mention 3 presidents and Trump seems to be not mentioned.What part of the Russians attempting to influence EVERY election since WWII and the cold war don't you understand. The Russians always have and always will attempt to put the most inept candidate into the WH. Sadly, until the advent of social media, they haven't been successful. Since social media, they have had tremendous success as the elections of Bush, Obama and Biden clearly show.
Certainly, they attempted---unsuccessfully.I am not arguing you general observation just the obvious. You do mention 3 presidents and Trump seems to be not mentioned.
So did they also interfere in the Trump election that he won is a yes or no question ?
I belief the first impeachment was a political error, meant mostly as a warning to Trump, and for “political effect,” though it proved a failure in both respects. The second impeachment after Jan. 6th was 100% proper and should have passed. The 57-Senate 43 vote to convict, which included 7 Republican Senators, failed only because the Republican leadership proved cowardly and gutless.Indictments by the opposition prove nothing. To your point, don't two scam impeachments and acquittals and the failure of baseless investigations lead you to believe that there is an attempt by the democrats to politically assassinate Trump?
“U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell noted … just moments after voting to acquit Trump [that] the courts are the proper forum for holding the former president accountable for his role in the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.
“‘President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office as an ordinary citizen,’ McConnell said on the Senate floor. ‘He didn’t get away with anything. Yet.’”
Certainly, they attempted---unsuccessfully.
Cry me a river and thank you for again showing your true colors. It is clear you do not wish to follow the constitution and the tenet that you are innocent until PROVEN guilty. Feel free to emigrate to Russia, China or N. Korea where the political beliefs are more in line with yours.Republican leadership proved cowardly and gutless.